Central Rand Gold Limited
(Incorporated as a company with limited liability under the laws of Guernsey,
Company Number 45108)
(Incorporated as an external company with limited liability under the laws of South Africa,
Registration number 2007/0192231/10)
ISIN: GG00B92NXM24
LSE share code: CRND JSE share code: CRD
("Central Rand Gold" or the "Company" or the "Group")
|
Abridged Annual Results and Annual Report Release
|
Central Rand Gold today announces its annual results for the year ended 31 December 2014.
Full copies of the Company's Annual Report and Accounts, including the Company Profile, Directors' Report, Corporate Governance and Sustainable Development Report, Directors' Responsibility Statement, Company Secretarial Confirmation, Auditor's Report and full Financial Statements, are available on the Company's website .
For further information, please contact:
Central Rand Gold +27(0) 87 310 4400
Johan du Toit / Nathan Taylor
Charles Stanley Securities Limited +44 (0) 20 7149 6478
Marc Milmo / Mark Taylor
Merchantec Capital +27 (0) 11 325 6363
Monique Martinez / Marcel Goncalves
Jenni Newman Public Relations +27 (0) 11 506 7351
Proprietary Limited
Jenni Newman
Chairman's report
I present to you the 2014 Annual Report for your Company.
The year 2014 was an extraordinary one for the Company, with a number of key events occurring, such as:
· significant capital improvement works carried out on the metallurgical plant;
· temporary closure of the underground mine due to the rising water table; and
· significant strategic investor interest in acquiring 100% of Central Rand Gold (Netherlands Antilles) N.V. ("CRGNV").
All of these events are over and above the ordinary course of business activities at Central Rand Gold. I believe that the board of directors of Central Rand Gold ("the Board"), and more particularly the Executive Committee, have done an excellent job in managing these extraordinary events whilst maintaining their focus on day-to-day operations. There is no doubt in my mind that we have made some tremendous progress over the past 12 months, which will enable the Company to be in a stronger operational position in 2015.
Undoubtedly, the most important event of the year was the strong interest in the Company from Asian based investors. The Board and Executive Committee spent much of the year marketing to investors and strategic partners throughout South Africa, London and Asia, with a view to attracting sufficient capital to better exploit the Company's vast gold reserves and resources. This initiative resulted in three Asian based companies submitting non-binding Memoranda of Understanding ("MOU") in Q4 2014. The MOUs contemplate Central Rand Gold selling 100 per cent of its shares in CRGNV to the successful bidder.
The three Asian companies, Hiria Group Company Limited ("Hiria"), Beijing Ankong Investment ("Ankong") and Shengbang Jiabo (Beijing) Consulting Company Limited ("Shengbang") submitted substantively similar offers of not more than US$150 million, with a target date for completion of 31 March 2015. This target date was subsequently extended to 12 June 2015 to accommodate a fourth interested party, Huili Resources Group Limited ("Huili"), who put forward a further MOU on 12 February 2015, which again contained substantively similar terms to the previously announced MOUs.
In June 2015, after the completion of the due diligence processes, both Huili and Hiria requested a one month extension to 15 July 2015, to enable them both to complete their respective internal processes. Further, the Board decided not to continue discussions with Ankong and Shengbang at that time, to enable it to focus on discussions and negotiations with Huili and Hiria.
We eagerly await the completion of the final negotiation processes with the knowledge that an acquisition and subsequent cash injection will finally allow the CRG project to reach its very significant potential.
"UPS AND DOWNS"
I find it useful to reflect on the ups and downs experienced throughout the year. In a year such as this it is often easy to dwell on the negative aspects and not acknowledge the many significant positives experienced throughout the year.
· It was with great sadness that in May 2014 we experienced our first fatality as a result of a fall of ground. This sad event triggered company wide introspection into safety practices and resulted in a number of improvements being made to our already rigorous and diligent safety protocols.
· On 28 May 2014, Trans Caledon Tunnel Authority ("TCTA") commenced with pumping and treatment operations of the High Density Sludge ("HDS") plant.
· A notable highlight for the Company was re-joining the 10 million ounce club with the reinstatement of 4.5 million ounces of JORC and SAMREC compliant Resources.
· The significant improvements made to the metallurgical plant in 2013 and early 2014 have begun to yield fruit. The third ball mill and upgraded leach circuit were commissioned to provide additional processing capacity and create sufficient redundancy to enable proper and proactive maintenance to occur. The metallurgical plant, having long been the Company's 'Achilles heel', is now consistently performing at or above expectation. Recoveries are strong and availability is typically above 85%. The new cone crushing circuit, specifically designed for harder underground ore, was commissioned and has performed consistently well throughout the year.
· Underground mining operations went from strength to strength in the early portion of the year. The Mine Call Factor ("MCF") stabilised well above industry averages and insitu grades consistently exceeded expectations. Not only were we able to mine the orebody with conventional techniques, we were able to mine it efficiently and economically.
· The unfortunate delay in commencement of pumping and the initial teething issues experienced by the TCTA at the HDS plant forced the Company to cease underground mining due to a rising water table. This was a great pity as the underground operations had just gotten into their stride and significant momentum had been created.
· The Company embarked on an intense and systematic exploration and evaluation programme to identify and secure sufficient surface material to sustain operations across the short- to mid-term. The identification of more than 390,000 tonnes of ore on surface, coupled with a number of third party toll treatment transactions, has enabled the Company to not only continue to "fill the mills", but to do so at a reduced cost.
· The exploration and evaluation programme identified very substantial low grade resources that would not ordinarily be economic. The conclusion of a "low grade Joint Venture" with fellow processor Mintails Limited has allowed both companies to monetise these low grade resources and add further to the revenue stream of the Company.
PUNO
The situation with Puno Gold Investments Proprietary Limited ("Puno"), our Black Economic Empowerment partner, remains a work in progress. The appeal process to set aside the 2013 decision is progressing slowly and has little to no impact on the Company's operational performance. I am pleased to state that communication channels with Puno have improved materially over the past 12 months and the two parties are actively working toward an amicable and mutually agreed solution. The Board truly hopes that the matter will be shortly concluded and energies can be redirected into a more fruitful endeavour.
APPRECIATION
I would like to thank Michael McMahon, who resigned as Director and Chairman during the year, for his sterling efforts and steady hand in guiding the Company during his tenure. I would also like to thank Miklos Salamon, former Non-executive Director, for his unsurpassed technical guidance and strategic foresight. The Company has greatly benefited from the combined stewardship of Michael and Miklos over the past number of years and we thank them for their dedication to the Company. Furthermore, Patrick Malaza must also be acknowledged for his strong work ethic and dedication he brought to the role of Finance Director until his resignation during the year.
I welcome to the Board new Non-executive Director, Allen Phillips, with the confidence that his years of metallurgical experience in operations will be transferred to the production team. The Company has already seen the benefits of Allen's involvement through the metallurgical plant upgrade process which has been extremely successful. Allen's experience and 'hands on' approach has brought a new dimension and energy to the Company's metallurgical division and we look forward to him continuing to drive improvements over the coming 12 months.
I also must acknowledge Jason Hou for his tireless work in marketing the Company within mainland China and Hong Kong. He has been instrumental in identifying and engaging with the four Asian-based parties which signed MOUs to purchase CRGNV. His guiding hand and insight into the Asian region has enabled the Company to engage effectively and meaningfully with our MOU counterparties.
Additionally, the Executive Committee must be commended on their focus and unwavering determination. As aforementioned, the Executive Committee has worked tirelessly to improve the operations and grow shareholder value, whilst also playing a significant role in the MOU negotiations and due diligence process. Johan du Toit has once again led by example and I wish to thank him for working so effectively with myself and the rest of the Board.
Finally, I thank the shareholders of Central Rand Gold for their continued support and believe the Company is in a strong position to embark on 2015.
Nathan Taylor
Chairman
Chief Executive Officer's report
INTRODUCTION
2014 has been a year full of unexpected events, from the Company encountered its first fatality, to the temporary suspension of its underground mining operations due to the rising water table, to finding new economic surface mining opportunities potential and concluding the year with the potential sale of CRGNV.
SAFETY
The Company's already strong focus on safety was heightened throughout 2014 post the Company's first fatality. An underground worker installing support died as a result of loose rocks becoming dislodged from historically mined out areas up-dip from the working area. This sad event led the Company to modify the mining and support layout to ensure better safety at the working face.
ACID MINE DRAINAGE ("AMD")
The HDS plant has now been operational since May 2014. Despite a good start to the operations, with the observation of a drop in the water table in June 2014, the flow rate was unfortunately reduced in mid-August 2014 as a result of the decision by the TCTA to strengthen the mechanical components of the two 42 million litre thickeners at the HDS plant. This upgrade was required in order to improve, manage and control the AMD sludge and to ensure the longer term improved performance of the HDS plant. The final upgrade is planned for completion during 2015.
Whilst the pumping solution is showing positive signs of basin wide dewatering, which will ultimately greatly benefit the Company, the delays in the initiation of the pumping and the subsequent teething problems have had a temporary but significant impact on our underground mining operation.
Mining on the high grade Main Reef horizon began to tail off from April 2014 as the water levels began to flood the lower Main Reef workings. In July 2014, with most of the Main Reef submerged, focus shifted to the much lower grade North Reef. Finally, as the water level reached the ventilation shaft and secondary access way in October 2014, crews were pulled out of the decline and underground mining was halted.
The Company has been carefully gathering information regarding HDS performance and water level movement at our mining operations. It seems that if the flow rate can be maintained at approximately 60 million litres per day ("mlpd"), which equates to approximately 80% of nameplate capacity of the HDS plant, a reduction in the water level occurs.
Positively since March 2015, the flow rate has been fairly consistently maintained at approximately 72 mlpd, resulting in a drop in the water table of approximately 4.5 vertical metres, from March to end of May 2015, which is very positive as it indicates that the central basin water level can be dropped even during the raining season.
MINING UPDATE
Highlights
• Underground production on the Main and North Reefs was halted in October 2014 as a result of the rising AMD blocking the secondary escape route and ventilation shaft.
• Underground production for the year was 99,546 tonnes at an average grade of 3.1g/t. The average Main Reef grade was 3.78g/t. The average North Reef grade was 1.78g/t.
• Open Pit production was 69,747 tonnes at an average grade of 2.41g/t.
Production
The following table shows key mining statistics for 2014, comparing the actual statistics with those achieved in 2013.
|
2014
|
2013
|
Difference
|
Activity
|
Metres (m) Tonnes (t)
|
Grade (g/t)
|
Metres (m) Tonnes (t)
|
Grade (g/t)
|
Metres (m) Tonnes (t)
|
Grade (g/t)
|
Waste Development (m)
|
313
|
|
595
|
|
282
|
|
Reef Development (m)
|
200
|
|
559
|
|
359
|
|
Total (m)
|
513
|
|
1,154
|
|
641
|
|
Stoping (t)
|
99,546
|
3.14
|
111,671
|
4.66
|
12,125
|
1.52
|
Open Pits (t)
|
69,747
|
2.41
|
91,038
|
3.13
|
21,291
|
0.72
|
Total Tonnes
|
169,293
|
|
202,709
|
|
33,416
|
|
Mining update
Underground production and grades showed a large drop from 2013 due to the rising water levels cutting off the higher grade Main Reef stopes progressively from April to July 2014. Underground stoping moved to lower grade North Reef as a last resort in July 2014 but by October 2014 this too was cut off by the water levels.
Notwithstanding the temporary cessation of underground mining, the conventional mining methods employed have been a resounding success with the key metrics of tonnage, grade and MCF all being met and generally exceeded. Hanging wall dilution was effectively controlled and backstope sweepings were systematically undertaken.
During 2014, in an attempt to minimise staff redundancies, the Company reviewed mining opportunities at Middelvlei Mine and trialled a sweeping and vamping operation at one of Gravelotte Mines Limited's ("Gravelotte") (a mining operation on the east rand of Johannesburg) old shafts. After completing some reef picking at Middelvlei rock dumps, operations were stopped, due to limited further low cost opportunities in the area. The Gravelotte operations provided some interesting results, however it did not achieve the Company's minimum investment return and the operations were stopped at the end of December 2014.
METALLURGICAL UPDATE
Production
The year 2014 saw the completion of the metallurgical plant expansion projects which were initiated in 2013. These capital projects were undertaken to improve overall plant availability, MCF and gold recovery and tonnage throughput. The results of the capital projects have been strong with a demonstrable improvement in the key plant metrics aforementioned. Unfortunately however, other factors such as the temporary cessation of underground mining which reduced the availability of quality ore have lessened the expected impact of these improvements.
Plant production
|
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
Mill 1 (tonnes)
|
4,116
|
8,704
|
8,867
|
9,636
|
9,995
|
10,057
|
8,555
|
6,811
|
6,217
|
8,285
|
4,617
|
7,535
|
Mill 3 (tonnes)
|
2,960
|
3,683
|
3,470
|
3,899
|
2,430
|
468
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Mill 3 (tonnes)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3,492
|
7,472
|
7,183
|
5,779
|
4,587
|
7,036
|
6,678
|
5,988
|
Mill availability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mill 1 Availability (%)
|
40.6
|
91.3
|
84.4
|
89.4
|
93.7
|
92.1
|
94.6
|
75.4
|
91.6
|
87.4
|
61.0
|
84.9
|
Mill 2 Availability (%)
|
93.2
|
89.3
|
88.6
|
86.3
|
93.2
|
94.6
|
Off
|
Off
|
Off
|
Off
|
Off
|
Off
|
Mill 3 Availability (%)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
78.9
|
91.8
|
94.4
|
82.3
|
95.5
|
93.2
|
90.6
|
80.7
|
Gold recovery throughout the year was somewhat variable, due largely to the changing nature of the feedstock. The move from Main Reef to North Reef to sands and slimes and open pit oxides did place the equilibrium of the plant under strain. However, the overall recoveries remained acceptable at 82%.
|
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
Plant recovery (%)
|
94
|
92
|
90
|
87
|
82
|
84
|
77
|
60
|
73
|
78
|
87
|
79
|
Crushing and Screening
The Company completed the installation of its new Symons 4 ¼ cone crusher and commissioned the unit in November 2014. The unit has thus far demonstrated excellent availability and reliability. The commissioning of the cone completed the crushing and screening upgrades which commenced in 2013 with the building of the Jaw crusher and screening train. The upgraded crushing and screening circuit allows the Company to reduce both hard sulphide ore from underground as well as softer oxide ore sourced from the open pits to the required minus 12mm for milling. The circuit has proven to be able to produce in excess of 40ktpm.
Milling capacity
The additional 9' x 10' ball mill acquired toward the end of 2013 was commissioned on 15 May 2014 and has performed exceptionally well, showing a 33% upgrade in the processing capacity of the entire metallurgical plant. The availability of the new mill has increased from 73% on hot commissioning to the current steady state of 92%.
Further metallurgical upgrades
The cash injection from the Redstone Capital Limited ("Redstone") further enabled the refurbishment and upgrade of the water reticulation system and a full rebuild and upgrade of the elution column and heat exchanger.
The Company also started the installation of the new leach tank which provides substantially more residence time allowing for improved gold recoveries. The leach tank installation is scheduled to be completed by early July 2015. The thickener project has been put on hold pending the outcome of the potential sale of CRGNV.
GEOLOGICAL UPDATE
Resources
SAMREC Mineral Resources for the Company were updated in July 2014, with the reclassification of previous Exploration Target material between 450 metres and 900 metres as Mineral Resource. This was achieved through the demonstration of the ability of the Ritz pumps to dewater the entire basin simultaneously as well as the completion of capital and economic studies showing that further de-watering beneath the 450 metre level can be done efficiently and economically. With the installation of additional pumps and piping, this hurdle for "eventual economic extraction", a key aspect in the definition of 'Mineral Resources' in terms of the SAMREC Code, can be satisfied.
This has allowed the Company and the Independent Competent Person, Venmyn Deloitte Proprietary Limited, to re-rate the gold mineralisation between 450 metres and 900 metres below surface from "Exploration Target" to "Mineral Resource". This reclassification has more than doubled the resource base of the Company from 4.51 Moz to 9.90 Moz of contained gold.
SAMREC Compliant Mineral Resources
|
|
July 2014
|
February 2014
|
Area
|
Category
|
Tonnes
|
Grade
|
Content
|
Tonnes
|
Grade
|
Content
|
(Mt)
|
(g/t)
|
(Moz)
|
(Mt)
|
(g/t)
|
(Moz)
|
CMR
|
Measured
|
1.46
|
3.65
|
0.17
|
1.46
|
3.65
|
0.17
|
|
Indicated
|
14.43
|
4.22
|
1.97
|
11.30
|
4.53
|
1.64
|
|
Inferred
|
5.64
|
6.65
|
1.23
|
4.34
|
5.60
|
0.78
|
|
Exploration Target
|
12.02
|
9.26
|
3.59
|
15.86
|
8.49
|
4.33
|
Crown
|
Indicated
|
5.78
|
5.83
|
1.11
|
2.58
|
5.67
|
0.47
|
|
Inferred
|
3.11
|
8.03
|
0.80
|
2.77
|
7.19
|
0.64
|
|
Exploration Target
|
20.81
|
10.07
|
6.73
|
24.34
|
9.61
|
7.52
|
City
|
Indicated
|
2.88
|
6.97
|
0.63
|
0.78
|
7.58
|
0.19
|
|
Inferred
|
2.43
|
6.99
|
0.55
|
0.70
|
8.00
|
0.18
|
|
Exploration Target
|
19.12
|
9.66
|
6.32
|
22.95
|
9.66
|
7.13
|
Village
|
Indicated
|
1.80
|
6.48
|
0.39
|
0.53
|
5.87
|
0.10
|
|
Inferred
|
0.20
|
13.60
|
0.10
|
0.17
|
14.64
|
0.08
|
|
Exploration Target
|
12.27
|
10.93
|
4.30
|
13.57
|
10.57
|
4.61
|
Simmers
|
Indicated
|
1.53
|
8.80
|
0.43
|
0.73
|
8.10
|
0.19
|
|
Inferred
|
0.15
|
8.20
|
0.04
|
0.15
|
8.29
|
0.04
|
|
Exploration Target
|
8.75
|
10.35
|
2.92
|
9.55
|
10.29
|
3.16
|
Other
|
Indicated
|
3.16
|
1.22
|
0.13
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Inferred
|
20.47
|
3.61
|
2.36
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Exploration Target
|
10.04
|
9.07
|
2.92
|
33.67
|
8.34
|
5.41
|
Total
|
Measured Resource
|
1.46
|
3.57
|
0.17
|
1.46
|
3.57
|
0.17
|
Total
|
Indicated Resource
|
29.58
|
4.85
|
4.66
|
15.92
|
5.06
|
2.59
|
Total
|
Inferred Resource
|
32.00
|
4.92
|
5.08
|
8.13
|
6.58
|
1.72
|
Total
|
Exploration Target
|
83.01
|
10.03
|
26.78
|
119.94
|
8.34
|
32.16
|
Grand Total*
|
|
146.05
|
7.80
|
36.69
|
145.45
|
7.84
|
36.64
|
*Totals are based on additional decimal points resulting in minor total discrepancies.
The cessation of underground mining during the year means that no further changes or updates to the Mineral Resources were undertaken as only a nominal amount of ore was extracted prior to the cessation.
There was a significant focus on exploration and evaluation throughout the year, brought on by the need to source replacement ore as a result of the short to mid-term cessation of underground operations. The introduction of concentric ripper machinery to the mining fleet has facilitated the exploitation of surface deposits containing very hard rock which has previously been considered uneconomic due to the need for explosives. Consequently, the introduction of the concentric ripper machinery has enabled the Company to re-evaluate known deposits which contain very hard rock such as Slots 4, 5 and 7.
The re-evaluation of these slots has shown that they can be strongly economic and have been reclassified as Shallow Exploration Target in terms of the SAMREC code. Operations in early 2015 have demonstrated that the grades actually exceed expectations and significant further potential exists in these areas over and above that already discovered.
Slot
|
Target area
|
Reef
|
Dip
|
V. Depth
|
Tonnage range (t)
|
Approximate grade
|
Slot 5
|
Pits 1 to 3
|
White
|
40 deg
|
30m
|
64,000 to 125,900
|
2.8g/t
|
Slot 7
|
Main Pit
|
White
|
45 deg
|
30m
|
60,000 to 174,000
|
2.7g/t
|
Slot 4
|
K7 Top
|
Kimberly
|
45 deg
|
10m
|
5,000 to 22,000
|
1.7g/t
|
Slot 4
|
K7 Middle
|
Kimberly
|
45 deg
|
10m
|
5,000 to 20,000
|
1.8g/t
|
Slot 4
|
K7 Bottom
|
Kimberly
|
45 deg
|
10m
|
5,000 to 15,000
|
1.7g/t
|
NASREC
|
Pits 1, 2 and 3
|
Main
|
45 deg
|
40m
|
30,000 to 37,800
|
2.7g/t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,000 to 395,000
|
2.6g/t
|
The potential quantity and grade described by the term "Exploration Target" is conceptual in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define a Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the definition of a Resource. Further exploration work is ongoing, and includes trial mining and processing of this shallow target to establish grade and ore body continuity, mineability, dilution and throughput characteristics.
NOTE: The information in this statement relating to Mineral Resources and geology has been reviewed and approved by Mr Keith Matier, BSc (Hons), GDE, PrSci Nat, who is a Competent Person in terms of the SAMREC code. Mr Matier is the Geology Manager of Central Rand Gold South Africa Proprietary Limited and has over 21 years' experience in exploration, mineral resource management and mineral evaluation.
Mine Call Factor
The MCF during 2014 continued on the same positive trajectory seen during 2013. The "face to pour" MCF reconciliation averaged a solid 78% for the year. The wind down and changeover from underground operations to surface operations during September 2014 had a predictable negative impact on that month's figures; however this was quickly rectified in October.
|
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
MCF (%)
|
66
|
65
|
94
|
127
|
73
|
67
|
74
|
72
|
57
|
85
|
75
|
77
|
Whilst 78% is a very satisfying result brought about by several years of focus on gold preservation, it is believed that further improvement is possible.
FINANCIAL REVIEW
The financial performance was negatively impacted during the year, mainly from the rising water table and the resultant cessation of underground mining. What was disappointing was that the year started well, with underground mining performing in line with expectations. Operational plans were being implemented for the Company's medium term growth strategy, which included the successful commissioning of the new mill, in May 2014, which provided the operations with additional processing capacity.
The delay in commissioning of the HDS plant, coupled with the resultant rise of the water table during the first half of 2014, resulted in the active underground mining areas being flooded. As the Company was unsure how the HDS would perform, once commissioned and how quickly the water table could be dropped, it decided to retain as many key mining skills and resources so that it would have the ability to quickly restart underground mining operations. As an alternative it decided to mine a new target area being the North reef, to maintain some form of underground mining presence. In September 2014, based on the performance of the HDS plant and its commissioning issues, the Company realised that in the short term it would not be able to restart normal underground operations. With the North Reef grades becoming sub-economic and the second access way being flooded, the Company made the decision to suspend underground operations.
With lower underground production, the Company needed to find an appropriate substitute ore body to continue to produce gold. The Company immediately commenced a review process to re-analyse all open cast opportunities. During this time the Company strived to maintain its plant throughput by processing available material which was accessed from numerous sources including old waste rock and sand dumps. As can be seen from the below gold production graph, during April - September 2014, the high variability and low reliability of this material resulted in the Company's gold production and ultimately cash reserves being placed under serious strain.
In September 2014, the assessment of new open cast potential was completed and the Company commenced mining at Slot 5. During the last quarter of 2014, the Company restructured it business and started the process of staff reductions (which was effective early 2015), to closely reflect its new operational business requirements. Overall with lower gold production due to the transition from underground to surface mining coupled with redundancy costs all put significant strain on the Company's balance sheet. The cash resources at the end of the year were US$0.9 million.
POST BALANCE SHEET EVENT
In order to strengthen its balance sheet and in pursuit of achieving its stated mine plan, the Company has subsequent to year-end completed the following fundraising:
· A share placement on 17 June 2015 of 6,015,000 new ordinary shares at 10 pence per ordinary share, which raised £0.602 million.
· A further share placement on 18 June 2015, of 2,000,000 new ordinary shares at 10 pence per ordinary share, which raised £0.2 million.
In June 2015, after the completion of the due diligent processes, both Huili and Hiria requested a one month extension to 15 July 2015, to enable them both to complete their respective internal processes. Further, the Board decided not to continue discussions with Ankong and Shengbang at that time, to enable it to focus on discussions and negotiations with Huili and Hiria. It is important to note that the transaction will still be subject to obtaining regulatory and exchange approvals. In addition, shareholder approval for the transaction will be required.
LOOKING FORWARD
The transition from underground mining to surface mining was undoubtedly a painful process during 2014. The exploration work undergone in 2014 has put the Company on a steady footing while it waits to re-commence underground mining. With just under 400,000 tonnes of open cast potential and the Company identifying other surface mining opportunities outside its mining right area, it believes based on its smaller organisational structure, that it can be operationally sustainable during this time. The Company has plans to further increasing its Metallurgical capacity, which should come on line during the second half of 2015. This additional revenue coupled with the small June 2015 fundraise will be used to strengthen the Company's balance sheet.
The sale of CRGNV remains a key focus for the Company. As stated by Nathan Taylor, in the Chairman's statement: "We eagerly await the completion of the final negotiation processes with the knowledge that an acquisition and subsequent cash injection into the Company will finally allow the CRG project to reach its very significant potential." If the Company is unsuccessful in effecting the above transaction, it will continue to market the project to international investors.
In August 2016, the US$7.25 million convertible loan note ("loan note") issued to Redstone, becomes repayable. Redstone has the right to covert this loan note to equity at any time before this date. If this conversion is not effected, then the Company will look at either re-negotiating the terms of the agreement with Redstone, possibly extending the expiry date, or consider approaching the capital markets, where it has successfully raised funds over the last 18 months, to fund the repayment of this debt. The Board will ultimately, at the appropriate time, consider and adopt the best possible solution to manage this position.
The Company expects to recommence underground mining, by end 2016. The Company will continue to monitor the water table, and effect plans to recommence underground operations as soon as practically possible. An amended Mine Works Programme was submitted to the DMR in 2015, to reflect the cession of underground works and the refocus on open pit mining.
THANKS
Sincere thanks must go to everyone who has played a role in the Company successfully negotiating another challenging, yet rewarding year. All stakeholders have made a meaningful contribution to Central Rand Gold's ongoing development as a sustainable junior mining enterprise - this includes Directors, managements, staff, suppliers, shareholders and community members.
Johan du Toit
Chief Executive Officer
Statement of Financial Position
|
|
as at 31 December 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
US$'000
|
|
US$'000
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
3,592
|
|
3,619
|
Intangible assets
|
|
2,830
|
|
3,131
|
Security deposits and guarantees
|
|
191
|
|
194
|
Environmental guarantee investment
|
|
3,177
|
|
3,338
|
Loans receivable
|
|
8,646
|
|
8,571
|
|
|
18,436
|
|
18,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
Security deposits and guarantees
|
|
65
|
|
70
|
Prepayments and other receivables
|
|
1,239
|
|
914
|
Inventories
|
|
76
|
|
910
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
914
|
|
2,475
|
Non-current assets held-for-sale
|
|
-
|
|
174
|
Derivative asset
|
|
720
|
|
-
|
|
|
3,014
|
|
4,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
21,450
|
|
23,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to equity holders of the parent
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital
|
|
26,490
|
|
25,604
|
Share premium
|
|
222,963
|
|
213,377
|
Share-based compensation reserve
|
|
28,238
|
|
28,224
|
Treasury shares
|
|
(6)
|
|
(6)
|
Foreign currency translation reserve
|
|
(29,534)
|
|
(29,442)
|
Accumulated losses
|
|
(261,559)
|
|
(246,291)
|
|
|
(13,408)
|
|
(8,534)
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Total equity
|
|
(13,408)
|
|
(8,534)
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental rehabilitation
|
|
4,904
|
|
5,713
|
Loan payable
|
|
14,418
|
|
13,719
|
|
|
19,322
|
|
19,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
6,911
|
|
6,971
|
Taxation payable
|
|
177
|
|
155
|
Derivative liability
|
|
8,448
|
|
5,372
|
|
|
15,536
|
|
12,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
34,858
|
|
31,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity and liabilities
|
|
21,450
|
|
23,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Profit or Loss
|
|
for the year ended 31 December 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
US$'000
|
|
US$'000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
8,212
|
|
14,627
|
Production costs
|
|
(9,844)
|
|
(16,344)
|
Employee benefits expense
|
|
(3,223)
|
|
(3,969)
|
Directors' emoluments
|
|
(717)
|
|
(850)
|
Inventory write-(down)/up
|
|
(705)
|
|
39
|
Operating lease expense
|
|
(787)
|
|
(523)
|
Operational expenses
|
|
(502)
|
|
(1,583)
|
Other expenses
|
|
(1,702)
|
|
(2,860)
|
Other income and gains
|
|
543
|
|
622
|
Foreign exchange transaction gains/(losses)
|
|
129
|
|
(121)
|
Loss before interest, tax and depreciation
|
|
(8,596)
|
|
(10,962)
|
Depreciation
|
|
(460)
|
|
(536)
|
Impairment of assets
|
|
(158)
|
|
(224)
|
Loss on fair value of convertible loan note
|
|
(5,108)
|
|
(3,234)
|
Finance income
|
|
1,233
|
|
1,287
|
Finance costs
|
|
(2,179)
|
|
(1,123)
|
Loss before income tax
|
|
(15,268)
|
|
(14,792)
|
Income tax expense
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Loss for the year
|
|
(15,268)
|
|
(14,792)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss is attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Equity holders of the parent
|
|
(15,268)
|
|
(14,792)
|
|
|
(15,268)
|
|
(14,792)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share for loss attributable to the equity holders during the year (expressed in US cents per share)
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share
|
|
(17.51)
|
|
(46.23)
|
Diluted loss per share
|
|
(17.51)
|
|
(46.23)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Comprehensive Income
|
for the year ended 31 December 2014
|
|
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
US$'000
|
|
US$'000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss for the year
|
|
(15,268)
|
|
(14,792)
|
Other comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
Item that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences on translating foreign operations
|
|
(91)
|
|
(784)
|
Other comprehensive loss for the period, net of tax
|
|
(91)
|
|
(784)
|
Total comprehensive loss for the period
|
|
(15,359)
|
|
(15,576)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss is attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Equity holders of the parent
|
|
(15,359)
|
|
(15,576)
|
|
|
(15,359)
|
|
(15,576)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|