|
|
|
|
|
|
Americans
can take comfort in the likelihood that the showdown between mortgage lenders
and homeowners will not resemble Greece’s battle-to-the-death with its
creditors. In the U.S., the banks are slowly losing ground to a populist,
election-year tide that eventually will force lenders to accept a moratorium
on mortgage debt for tens of millions of homeowners. In the rapidly
escalating legal battle to bring this about, last week’s $25 billion
settlement between the banks and the U.S. did not settle much of anything,
since the banks in theory can still be sued into oblivion by aggrieved
homeowners. The plaintiffs will be claiming in effect and with a straight
face that they got in over their heads because lenders forced them to borrow
more than they could repay. Who would have imagined just a decade ago that an
army of reckless borrowers would seek the protection of the courts under the
remorseless deadbeat’s battle flag “Kick me, beat me, make me write bad checks”? That’s what
it’s come down to, evidently, and woe to any bank that asks the court
for help in turning a family out onto the street. The five big banks that
signed onto the deal are undoubtedly running scared, since the legal latitude
afforded those who could conceivably claim “questionable lending
practices” has been widened to include just about anyone who lives in a
home – including, presumably, tens of millions more homeowners
who are not yet underwater but eventually will be. Keep in mind that
the costs of the yet-to-be-unveiled Homeowner Bailout Act of 2014 have
already been socialized, since the GSEs have been originating 90% of all new
mortgage loans.
Contrast this with the increasingly dire situation in Greece, where lenders,
backed by a docile and ignorant press, are still able to pretend that they
have the upper hand. They made quite a show of this over the weekend, holding
up the bailout money for Greece until the onerous terms of a paltry
130-billion euro loan are ratified by the Greek parliament. The idea was to
bind future Greek leaders to the severe austerity measures on the table.
While the wrangling continued on Sunday, a headline atop an Associated Press
story shouted a dubious claim being made by Greece’s leaders –
that the Cuts Will Avert a ‘Social Explosion’. More likely is
that the cuts will briefly postpone the country’s collapse into a
generation of penury. What would happen if Greece were to default? The
following, according to the nation’s prime minister, Lucas Papademos: Greeks would lose their savings; the
state would be unable to pay salaries and pensions; and shortages would occur
in important items such as medicines, fuel and machinery. Under the
circumstances, it’s easy to understand why Greece’s political
leaders would want to keep kicking the can down the road. After all, anything
seems preferable to letting the catastrophe that looms simply happen. In the
meantime, a potential escalation of violence was foreshadowed by a statement
made by Vasso Papandreou, a socialist and former
member of the European Commission: “If we say we do not pay the
bond that matures on March 20, all [Europeans] will rush to find a
solution.” One of these days, we would bet, Greece seems certain to
call the lenders’ bluff. On that day, we wouldn’t want to
be caught short the U.S. dollar.
|
|
|
|
|