|
|
By a continuous process of
inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part
of the wealth of their citizens. By this method, they not only confiscate,
but they confiscate arbitrarily; and while the process impoverishes many, it
actually enriches some....The process engages all of the hidden forces of
economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner that not one
man in a million can diagnose." - John Maynard Keynes
Economic Consequences of the Peace, 1920
Convicted
Soviet Spy Harry Dexter White
(left) and John Maynard Keynes (right)
at the Bretton Woods Conference
Singing
the Red Flag, the highborn sons of the British upper-class lay on the
carpeted floor spinning out socialist schemes in homosexual intermission.
Sometimes, one of the participants would shout out an obscenity - then, as if
on signal, the entire group would join in a frenzied babble of profanity.
Here and there individuals would smoke or chew hashish. Most had unkempt long
hair, and some sported beards.
The
attitude in such gatherings was anti-establishmentarian. To them the older
generation was horribly out of date; even superfluous. The capitalist system
was declared obsolete, and revolution was proclaimed as the only solution.
Christianity was pronounced an enemy force, and the worst sort
of depravities were eulogized as “that love which passes all
Christian understanding.”
The year was 1904, and the participants were
destined to become the intellectual and political leaders of the British
Empire.
Chief of this ring of homosexual revolutionaries
was John Maynard Keynes, who eventually became the economic architect of
English socialism and gravedigger for the British Empire. The chief American Fabians,
acting as carriers of the Keynesian sickness, were Felix Frankfurter and
Walter Lippmann. Covertly, they mobilized their Leftist comrades to spread
this pollution in America also. So successful were they that on January 4,
1971, President Nixon announced: “I am now a Keynesian in
economics.” What does that mean?
Keynes was characterized by his male sweetheart, LyttonStrachey, as “A liberal and a sodomite, an
atheist and a statistician.” His particular depravity was the sexual
abuse of little boys. In communications to his homosexual friends, Keynes
advised that they go to Tunis, “where bed and boy
were also not expensive.” As a sodomistic
pedophiliac, he ranged throughout the Mediterranean area in search of boys
for himself and his fellow socialists. Taking full advantage of the bitter
poverty and abysmal ignorance in North Africa, the Middle East, and Italy, he
purchased the bodies of children prostituted for English shillings[See Lytton
Strachey, A Critical Biography, Michael Holyroyd,
Holt, Rinehart and Winston, two volumes].
Such Leftist hypocrites then, as now, issued loud
denunciations against poverty, imperialism, and capitalist immorality.
However, for their own degenerate purposes, they eagerly sought out the worst
pockets of destitution and backwardness to satisfy their perverted purposes
through sexual enslavement of youngsters. While traveling in France and the
United States they complained among themselves of the harassment by the
police of practicing homosexuals. In degenerate areas of the Mediterranean,
on the other hand, they found a pervert’s Utopia where the bodies of
children could be purchased as part of a cultured socialist’s holiday.
These Leftist degenerates began to scheme over
sixty years ago to secure public acceptance of their depravity. Havelock
Ellis, a founder of the Fabian Society, compiled a massive erotic work
entitled, Studies In The Psychology Of Sex. Ellis was a sexual pervert and drug
user. He and a group of fellow Leftists even pioneered in the experimental
use of hallucinogens in private orgies. Ellis was definitely a pathological
case. He drove his wife into Lesbianism and drug addiction, securing
additional erotic excitement by urging her to recite her Lesbian experiences.
Mrs. Ellis eventually went insane and died in utmost misery after denouncing
her husband as a sexual monster.
The Fabian socialists used the writings of Ellis
as a wedge for sex education in the schools. They started in the colleges and
gradually eased into the high school level.
Ellis complained to his fellow socialists
fifty-five years ago that he found wider acceptance for his books in the United
States than he did in England. In fact, he was arrested and tried for
obscenity in England, whereas his books were sold here without serious
interference by the authorities. Today, his perversions are standard
reference material for the sex educators, and Havelock Ellis is popularly
called “the father of social psychology.”
Keynes and his cohorts seized upon the works of
Ellis as justification for their depravities. They were also greatly
bolstered in their campaign by the theories of an Austrian Leftist named
Sigmund Freud. Dr. Freud acknowledged in private correspondence that he
copied the thesis of sex as the central determinant in human action from
Havelock Ellis. Echoing Ellis, he laid down the premise that homosexuality
and carnal depravities are not a matter of abnormality, but merely a case of
personal preference. This, plus his declaration of atheism, overjoyed the
socialist Keynesian crowd. John Maynard Keynes audaciously proclaimed,
“Sex Questions are about to enter the political arena.” He
inveighed against “the treatment of sexual offense and
abnormalities,” adding the charge that “the existing state of the
Law and of orthodoxy is still Mediaeval - altogether out of touch with
civilized opinion and civilized practice and with what individuals, educated
and uneducated alike, say to one another in private.”
During the same period (1925) Keynes struck out
against drug control. He laid down the line which has been pursued by
Leftists to the present day in demanding that distribution of narcotics be
unrestricted. Homosexuals find drugs a useful adjunct in loosening moral
inhibitions to perversion. And this ravisher of little boys feigned sympathy
for the masses by urging universal rights for users of narcotics. He
declared: “how far is bored and suffering humanity to be allowed, from
time to time, an escape, an excitement, a stimulus, a
possibility of change?”
Keynes and his conspirators projected
homosexuality and drug addiction as an intrinsic part of their collectivist
society of the future. His male sweetheart, Lytton Strachey, wrote privately
that they would corrupt the whole population, “subtly, through
literature, into the bloodstream of the people, and in such a way that they
accepted it all naturally, if need be without at first realizing what it was
to which they were agreeing.” He boasted that he intended “to
seduce his readers to tolerance through laughter and sheer
entertainment.” He pointed out that the object was “to write in a
way that would contribute to an eventual change in our ethical and sexual
mores - a change that couldn’t be done in a minute, but would
unobtrusively permeate the more flexible minds of young people.” J. M.
Keynes put it in the terms of Marxist economics:
“When
the accumulation of wealth is no longer of high social importance, there will
be great changes in the code of morals. We shall be able to rid ourselves of
many pseudo-moral principles which have hagridden us for two hundred
years....”
Keynes
and Strachey used their malignant writings to help contaminate the entire
English-speaking world. In the United States they both found expression in
the New Republic, the New York Times, and the Saturday
Review Of Literature.
In 1939, a comrade of Keynes and Strachey named
Bertrand Russell came to America to push their obscenitarian
socialism and was (he says in his Autobiography) legally charged as
“lecherous, libidinous, lustful, venerous, erotomaniac, aphrodisiac, irreverent, narrow-minded,
untruthful, and bereft of moral fiber.” His aborted object had been to
permeate the College of the City of New York with the corruption of the
British Fabians. Immediately, John Dewey and other American Fabians organized
to cry that “Academic Freedom” was under attack. The National
Education Association (NEA) and the whole Leftist educational complex began
to percolate pervasive degeneracies as being “Liberal” and
“progressive.”
The works of Keynes, Lytton Strachey, and Bertrand
Russell have been, and are today, required reading in almost every college
and university in the United States and Canada.
In the spring of 1905 Keynes and his lavender
cohorts had been thrilled by a conference of Russian revolutionaries in
London. British Fabians and Joseph Fels, an
American soap manufacturer who was also a Fabian, had financed the Russian
gathering and furnished them a hall in a Christian church. Key
revolutionaries at this London conference included Nikolai Lenin, Leon
Trotsky, and Joseph Stalin. The future slaughter of fifty million civilians,
and the conquest of one-third of the earth’s surface. rested within the shelter of this gathering. Shivers of
excitement rippled down the spines of the socialist homosexuals when they
heard that Lenin had openly defended the slaughter of bank guards and
stealing of bank funds for the bolshevik coffers.
During this time Strachey wrote to one of his intimates: “At this
moment Keynes is lying on a rug beside me.”
Keynes and his fellow debauchees became active
pacifists and conscientious objectors during World War I. The socialist
position against military service dovetailed perfectly with the homosexual
aversion to any kind of physical danger and the manly requirements of
military training. Yet, in spite of Keynes’ sheltering of “queer
conchies,” and his own refusal to serve his country, he was made the
head of an important division of the British Treasury. During March of 1917
he confided privately that he supported the bolshevik
group among the Russian socialists after the overthrow of Czar Nicholas.
The seizure of power by the bolsheviks
in November of 1917 elated Keynes and the rest of the Fabian coterie. At
Leftist parties in London, Keynes and his fellow perverts celebrated by
dressing in women’s clothes and performing lewd dances. He had as his
consort an eighteen-year-old-boy who was ensconced as his assistant in the
Treasury Department.
Just before the Bolshevik Revolution, Keynes had
made a hurried trip to the United States for the British Government. Here he
had a chance to make contact with the American Fabians who were similarly
entrenched, via the Frankfurter-Lippmann group, in key positions of the
Wilson Administration.
Even the House of Morgan in New York City’s
financial district trotted out its sissies to welcome Keynes to this country,
and gave him an office just for himself. The international grapevine had
established the nature of his proclivities. The urbane air of Keynes sent
thrills of excitement through the ranks of the financial “giggle
gang.”
Keynes’ deviate socialist circle was almost
completely pro-bolshevik. One month after the
Revolution, J.M. Keynes wrote his mother”
“Well,
the only course open to me is to be buoyantly bolshevik;
and as I lie in bed in the morning I reflect with a good deal of satisfaction
that, because our rulers are as incompetent as they are mad and wicked, one
particular era of a particular kind of civilization is very nearly
over.”
On
February 22, 1918, Keynes proudly boasted of “being a bolshevik.” Yet the British Government blindly sent
Keynes to the Versailles peace talks. There he joined forces with his Fabian
American comrade, Walter Lippmann, who was among those representing the
equally blind U.S. Government. The ensuing pro-bolshevik
and anti-American machinations were largely responsible not only for laying
the basis for continuing Red victories, but also for setting off the chain of
events that eventually brought Hitler to power.
In 1919 Keynes authored The Economic
Consequences Of The Peace, which was promptly acclaimed from Moscow by
Nikolai Lenin, himself. The Red dictator declared: “Nowhere has the
Versailles treaty been described so well as in the book by Keynes.” A
special edition of The Economic Consequences was printed under the
label of the Fabian Society; and, Frankfurter and Lippmann brought the
manuscript to the United States and arranged with Harcourt and Brace to
publish it here. The volume became required reading among American socialists
and Communists.
However, Keynes’ value as a hidden Red was
in danger. The Fabians had developed the posture of
“respectability” to a fine art and the value of Keynes’
book as an “impartial work” was in jeopardy. With Keynes’
future usefulness in upper-class circles at stake, Lenin had personally come
to the rescue. He pulled the classic Leftist double-twist, praising
Keynes’ book as a model for Communist revolutionaries and at the same
time covering for Keynes by labeling him as “anti-bolshevik.”
Nikolai Lenin rose before the Second Congress of the Communist International
and declared:
“I
will quote another economic source which assumes particularly great
significance, the British diplomat Keynes, the author of The Economic
Consequences Of The Peace, who on the instructions of his government, took
part in the Versailles peace negotiations, watched them directly from the
purely bourgeois point of view, studied the subject step by step, and took
part in the conference as an economist. He arrived at conclusions which are
stronger, more striking and more instructive than any a Communist
revolutionary could advance, because they are conclusions drawn by an
acknowledged bourgeois....”
Thus
was launched the career of Fabian leader Keynes as a
“non-Leftist” and “non-Communist.”
In 1925, John Maynard Keynes was married. It was a
bizarre performance. His best “man” was Duncan Grant, his male
lover for many years, and initiates swear that Keynes held Duncan’s
hand as the marriage vows were spoken. But, the background of the bride was
equally odd. She was Lydia Lopokova, the premiere
ballerina of the Diaghilev Ballet. She was an
habitué of Leftist circles, and had at one time been engaged to
Heywood Broun, the well known socialist and
confidant of Leon Trotsky, but had broken the engagement to marry a dwarf
named Barocchi. In 1917 Lydia had disappeared in
Paris with the top Cossack general of the White Army, returning to the ballet
when the general returned to lead his troops against the bolsheviks.
The bolsheviki had by now, however, acquired
advance information and used it to defeat the Cossacks.
Following the wedding to Comrade Lydia, Mr. and
Mrs. Keynes were the special guests of the Soviet Government. He and his
Russian wife were allowed free access to the Soviet hinterland, even to the
extent of visiting her relatives. This was a privilege unheard of at the
time, since even members of the Communist International were not then allowed
such unlimited travel. It was a time of mass killing of civilians, and
ordinarily a Russian national traveling with an Englishman would have been
arrested and shot. But, Soviet officials were effusive in their thanks to Keynes
for designing the first Soviet currency for them while he was still a member
of the British Treasury.
The marriage was definitely an
“arrangement,” as Keynes continued to enjoy his amours with men.
This was often the case with upper-class homosexuals who needed a legal wife
as a facade. They both had separate living quarters, and did not interfere
with the personal lives of one another. Lydia was very useful as a go-between
since Keynes was in frequent contact with Soviet officials both in Britain and
the United States.
Meanwhile, the perversion continued apace. It was
quite a pace. As I have noted in the new edition of Keynes At Harvard:
Keynes
had relations with Strachey; Strachey had affairs with Duncan Grant; Keynes
stole Grant from Strachey; Lytton’s brother James Strachey adored
Rupert Brooks but so did Keynes; Strachey reports to G.E. Moore on seduction
of new boys; Keynes steals Edgar Duckworth from Lytton; Keynes and Lytton
agree that homosexuality is, “that love which passes all Christian understanding”;
Strachey emulates Oscar Wilde with absinthe and drugs; He also declares that,
“the whole truth is the Devil”; He predicts that in one hundred
years, “everyone will be converted,” to homosexuality; Strachey
and Keynes promote obscenitarian talk in colleges;
Lytton lives with Dora Carrington, a Lesbian; Carrington solicits homosexual
partners for Lytton; Keynes, Lytton and Carrington have orgies involving
Lesbian and sodomistic interchanges; Keynes and
Strachey dress in women’s clothes and dance; Keynes and Strachey give a
sanctuary to homosexual objectors to military service thus frustrating the
authorities; Keynes defends the use of drugs and Strachey smokes hashish;
Carrington married several men so they could be Strachey’s boy-friends;
Lytton stole Sebastian Sprott from Keynes (the
tables were turned); Lytton excuses his drug taking as a liberation from,
“this wrong world.” Finally, there are engrossments by Keynes and
Strachey with sadistic beating of young boys, “compulsive
pre-occupation with male reproductive and excretory organs” and voyages
to the most depraved dens of perversion throughout Europe, North Africa and
Asia.
The
Fabian homosexual circle was incredibly successful in gaining influence and
control in a wide area of activity. They staked out the entire British Empire
and the United States as well. Lytton Strachey wrote to Keynes:
“Oh
dear me!, when will my heaven be realized? - My
Castle in Spain? Rooms, you know, for you, Duncan and Swithin,
as fixtures - Woolf of course, too, if we can lure him from Ceylon; and
several suites for guests. Can you conceive anything more supreme! I should
write tragedies; you would revolutionize political economy, Swithin would compose French poetry, Duncan would paint
our portraits in every conceivable combination and permutation, and Woolf
would criticize us and our works without remorse.”
This projection was
incredibly prophetic. J. M. Keynes became the mastermind behind the economic
structure of British and American socialism. Strachey was responsible for
writing books that undermined the Christian ethic of the Nineteenth Century
and set the tone for the pornographic and depraved literature of today.
Leonard Woolf worked out the details of the socialist drive for World
Government. He was not only the architect of the League of Nations but
outlined the structure of the United Nations.
Others of this perverted group of Keynesians have
set the tone in art, music, education, and religion. Today [1971], alas, even
the President of the United States says: “I am now a Keynesian in
economics.” It is disgusting!
Read more: http://chasvoice.blogspot.com/2011/08/john-maynard-keynes-lavender-bolshevik.html#ixzz1ouHsO9fp
|
|
