|
A "paralyzed"
Federal Reserve Bank, in its "final days," held hostage by Wall
Street "robots" trading in markets that are "artificially
medicated" are just a few of the bleak observations shared by David
Stockman, former Republican U.S. Congressman and director of the Office of
Management and Budget. He is also a founding partner of Heartland Industrial
Partners and the author of The Triumph of Politics: Why Reagan's
Revolution Failed and the soon-to-be released The Great Deformation:
How Crony Capitalism Corrupts Free Markets and Democracy. The Gold Report caught up with Stockman
for this exclusive interview at the recent Recovery Reality Check conference.
The Gold Report: David, you have talked
and written about the effect of government-funded, debt-fueled spending on
the stock market. What will be the real impact of quantitative easing?
David Stockman: We are in the last
innings of a very bad ball game. We are coping with the crash of a 30-year–long
debt super-cycle and the aftermath of an unsustainable bubble.
Quantitative easing is
making it worse by facilitating more public-sector borrowing and preventing
debt liquidation in the private sector—both erroneous steps in my view.
The federal government is not getting its financial house in order. We are on
the edge of a crisis in the bond markets. It has already happened in Europe
and will be coming to our neighborhood soon.
TGR: What should the role of
the Federal Reserve be?
DS: To get out of the way
and not act like it is the central monetary planner of a $15 trillion
economy. It cannot and should not be done.
The Fed is destroying
the capital market by pegging and manipulating the price of money and debt
capital. Interest rates signal nothing anymore because they are zero. The
yield curve signals nothing anymore because it is totally manipulated by the
Fed. The very idea of "Operation Twist" is an abomination.
Capital markets are at
the heart of capitalism and they are not working. Savers are being crushed
when we desperately need savings. The federal government is borrowing when it
is broke. Wall Street is arbitraging the Fed's
monetary policy by borrowing overnight money at 10 basis points and investing
it in 10-year treasuries at a yield of 200 basis points, capturing the profit
and laughing all the way to the bank. The Fed has become a captive of the
traders and robots on Wall Street.
TGR: If we are in the final
innings of a debt super-cycle, what is the catalyst that will end the game?
DS: I think the likely
catalyst is a breakdown of the U.S. government bond market. It is the heart
of the fixed income market and, therefore, the world's financial market.
Because of Fed
management and interest-rate pegging, the market is artificially medicated.
All of the rates and spreads are unreal. The yield curve is not market
driven. Supply and demand for savings and investment, future inflation risk
discounts by investors—none of these free market forces matter. The
price of money is dictated by the Fed, and Wall Street merely attempts to
front-run its next move.
As long as the hedge
fund traders and fast-money boys believe the Fed can keep everything pegged,
we may limp along. The minute they lose confidence, they will unwind their
trades.
On the margin, nobody
owns the Treasury bond; you rent it. Trillions of treasury paper is funded on
repo: You buy $100 million (M) in Treasuries and immediately put them up as
collateral for overnight borrowings of $98M. Traders can capture the spread
as long as the price of the bond is stable or rising, as it has been for the
last year or two. If the bond drops 2%, the spread has been wiped out.
If that happens, the
massive repo structures—that is, debt owned by still more
debt—will start to unwind and create a panic in the Treasury market.
People will realize the emperor is naked.
TGR: Is that what happened
in 2008?
DS: In 2008 it was the repo
market for mortgage-back securities, credit default obligations and such. In
2008 we had a dry run of what happens when a class of assets owned on
overnight money goes into a tailspin. There is a thunderous collapse.
Since then, the repo
trade has remained in the Treasury and other high-grade markets because
subprime and low-quality mortgage-backed securities are dead.
TGR: Walk us through a
hypothetical. What happens when the fast-money traders lose confidence in the
Fed's ability to keep the spread?
DS: They are forced to
start selling in order to liquidate their carry trades because repo lenders
get nervous and want their cash back. However, when the crisis comes, there
will be insufficient private bids—the market will gap down hard unless
the central banks buy on an emergency basis: the Fed, the European Central
Bank (ECB), the people's printing press of China and all the rest of them.
The question is: Will
the central banks be able to do that now, given that they have already
expanded their balance sheets? The Fed balance sheet was $900 billion (B)
when Lehman crashed in September 2008. It took 93 years to build it to that
level from when the Fed opened for business in November 1914. Bernanke then
added another $900B in seven weeks and then he took it to $2.4 trillion in an
orgy of money printing during the initial 13 weeks after Lehman. Today it is
nearly $3 trillion. Can it triple again? I do not think so. Worldwide it's
the same story: the top eight central banks had $5 trillion of footings
shortly before the crisis; they have $15 trillion today. Overwhelmingly, this
fantastic expansion of central bank footings has been used to buy or discount
sovereign debt. This was the mother of all monetizations.
TGR: Following that path,
what happens if there are no buyers? Do the governments go into default?
DS: The U.S. Treasury needs
to be in the market for $20B in new issuances every week. When the day comes
when there are all offers and no bids, the music will stop. Instead of being
able to easily pawn off more borrowing on the markets—say 90 basis points
for a 5-year note as at present—they may have to pay hundreds of basis
points more. All of a sudden the politicians will run around with their hair
on fire, asking, what happened to all the free money?
TGR: What do the politicians
have to do next?
DS: They are going to have
to eat 30 years worth of lies and by the time they
are done eating, there will be a lot of mayhem.
TGR: Will the mayhem stretch
into the private sector?
DS: It will be everywhere.
Once the bond market starts unraveling, all the other risk assets will start
selling off like mad, too.
TGR: Does every sector
collapse?
DS: If the bond market goes
into a dislocation, it will spread like a contagion to all of the other asset
markets. There will be a massive selloff.
I think everything in
the world is overvalued—stocks, bonds, commodities, currencies. Too
much money printing and debt expansion drove the prices of all asset classes
to artificial, non-economic levels. The danger to the world is not classic
inflation or deflation of goods and services; it's a drastic downward
re-pricing of inflated financial assets.
TGR: Is there any way to
unravel this without this massive dislocation?
DS: I do not think so. When
you are so far out on the end of a limb, how do you walk it back?
The Fed is now at the
end of a $3 trillion limb. It has been taken hostage by the markets the
Federal Open Market Committee was trying to placate. People in the trading
desks and hedge funds have been trained to front run the Fed. If they think
the Fed's next buy will be in the belly of the curve, they buy the belly of
the curve. But how does the Fed ever unwind its current lunatic balance
sheet? If the smart traders conclude the Fed's next move will be to sell
mortgage-backed securities, they will sell like mad in advance; soon there
would be mayhem as all the boys and girls on Wall Street piled on. So the Fed
is frozen; it is petrified by fear that if it begins contracting its balance
sheet it will unleash the demons.
TGR: Was there some type of
tipping that allowed certain banks to front run the Fed?
DS: There are two kinds of
front-running. First is market-based front-running. You try to figure out
what the Fed is doing by reading its smoke signals and looking at how it
slices and dices its meeting statements. People invest or speculate against
the Fed's next incremental move.
Second, there is illicit
front-running, where you have a friend who works for the Federal Reserve
Board who tells you what happened in its meetings. This is obviously illegal.
But frankly, there is
also just plain crony capitalism that is not that different in character and
it's what Wall Street does every day. Bill Dudley, who runs the New York Fed,
was formerly chief economist for Goldman Sachs and he pretends to solicit an
opinion about financial conditions from the current Goldman economist, who
then pretends to opine as to what the economy and Fed might do next for the
benefit of Goldman's traders, and possibly its clients. So then it links in
the ECB, Bank of Canada, etc. Is there any monetary post in the world not run
by Goldman Sachs?
The point is, this is not the free market at work. This is central
bank money printers and their Wall Street cronies perverting what used to be
a capitalist market.
TGR: Does this unwinding of
the Fed and the bond markets put the banking system back in peril, like in
2008?
DS: Not necessarily. That
is one of the great myths that I address in my book. The banking system,
especially the mainstream banking system, was not in peril at all. The toxic
securitized mortgage assets were not in the Main Street banks and savings and
loans; these institutions owned mostly prime quality whole loans and could
have bled down the modest bad debt they did have over time from enhanced loan
loss reserves. So the run on money was not at the retail teller window; it
was in the canyons of Wall Street. The run was on wholesale money—that
is, on repo and on unsecured commercial paper that had been issued in the
hundreds of billions by financial institutions loaded down with securitized
toxic garbage, including a lot of in-process inventory, on the asset side of
their balance sheets.
The run was on
investment banks that were really hedge funds in financial drag. The Goldmans and Morgan Stanleys
did not really need trillion-dollar balance sheets to do mergers and
acquisitions. Mergers and acquisitions do not require capital; they require a
good Rolodex. They also did not need all that capital for the other part of
investment banking—the underwriting business. Regulated stocks and
bonds get underwritten through rigged cartels—they almost never under-price and really don't need much capital. Their
trillion dollar balance sheets, therefore, were just massive trading
operations—whether they called it customer accommodation or proprietary
is a distinction without a difference—which were funded on 30 to 1
leverage. Much of the debt was unstable hot money from the wholesale and repo
market and that was the rub—the source of the panic.
Bernanke thought this
was a retail run à la the 1930s. It was not; it was a
wholesale money run in the canyons of Wall Street and it should have
been allowed to burn out.
TGR: Let's get back to our
ballgame. What is to keep the U.S. population from saying, please Fed save us
again?
DS: This time, I think the
people will blame the Fed for lying. When the next crisis comes, I can see torches
and pitch forks moving in the direction of the Eccles
building where the Fed has its offices.
TGR: Let's talk about
timing. On Dec. 31, the tax cuts expire, defense cuts go into place and we
hit the debt ceiling.
DS: That will be a
clarifying moment; never before have three such powerful
vectors come together at the same time— fiscal triple witching.
First, the debt ceiling
will expire around election time, so the government will face another
shutdown and it will be politically brutal to assemble a majority in a lame
duck session to raise it by the trillions that will be needed. Second, the
whole set of tax cuts and credits that have been enacted over the last 10
years total up to $400–500B annually will expire on Dec. 31, so they
will hit the economy like a ton of bricks if not extended. Third, you have the sequester on defense spending that was put in last
summer as a fallback, which cannot be changed without a majority vote in
Congress.
It is a push-pull
situation: If you defer the sequester, you need more
debt ceiling. If you extend the tax expirations, you need a debt ceiling
increase of $100B a month.
TGR: What will Congress do?
DS: Congress will extend
the whole thing for 60 or 90 days to give the new president, if he hasn't
demanded a recount yet, an opportunity to come up with a plan.
To get the votes to
extend the debt ceiling, the Democrats will insist on keeping the income and
payroll tax cuts for the 99% and the Republicans will want to keep the
capital gains rate at 15% so the Wall Street speculators will not be
inconvenienced. It is utter madness.
TGR: It is like chasing your
tail. How does it stop?
DS: I do not know how a
functioning democracy in the ordinary course can deal with this. Maybe
someone from Goldman Sachs can come and put in a fix, just like in Greece and
Italy. The situation is really that pathetic.
TGR: Greece has come up with
some creative ways to bring down its sovereign debt without actually
defaulting.
DS: The Greek debt
restructuring was a farce. More than $100B was held by the European bailout
fund, the ECB or the International Monetary Fund. They got 100 cents on the
dollar simply by issuing more debt to Greece. For private debt, I believe the
net write-down was $30B after all the gimmicks, including the front-end
payment. The rest was simply refinanced. The Greeks are still debt slaves,
and will be until they tell Brussels to take a hike.
TGR: Going back to the
triple-witching hour at year-end, if the debt ceiling is raised again, when
do we start to see government layoffs and limitations on services?
DS: Defense purchases and
non-defense purchases will be hit with brutal force by the
sequester. As we go into 2013, there will be a shocking hit to the
reported GDP numbers as discretionary government spending shrinks. People
keep forgetting that most government spending is transfer payments, but it is
only purchases of labor and goods that go directly into the GDP calculations,
and it is these accounts that will get smacked by the sequester of
discretionary defense and non-defense budgets.
TGR: I would think to
unemployment numbers as well.
DS: They will go up.
Just take one example.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics monthly report, there are 650,000
or so jobs in the U.S. Postal Service alone. That is 650,000 people who
pretend to work at jobs that have more or less been made obsolete and
redundant by the Internet and who are paid through borrowings from Uncle Sam
because the post office is broke. Yet, the courageous ladies and gentlemen on
Capitol Hill cannot even bring themselves to vote to
discontinue Saturday mail delivery; they voted to study it! That is a measure
of the loss of capacity to rationally cognate about our fiscal circumstance.
TGR: In the midst of this
volatility, how can normal people preserve, much less expand their wealth?
DS: The only thing you can
do is to stay out of harm's way and try to preserve what you can in cash. All
of the markets are rigged or impaired. A 4% yield on blue chip stocks is not
worth it, because when the thing falls apart, your 4% will be gone in an
hour.
TGR: But if the government
keeps printing money, cash will not be worth as much, either, right?
DS: No, I do not think we
will have hyperinflation. I think the financial system will break down before
it can even get started. Then the economy will go into paralysis until we
find the courage, focus and resolution to do something about it. Instead of
hyperinflation or deflation there will be a major financial dislocation,
which means painful re-pricing of financial assets.
How painful will the
re-pricing be? I think the public already knows that it will be really
terrible. A poll I saw the other day indicated that 25% of people on the
verge of retirement think they are in such bad financial shape that they will
have to work until age 80. Now, the average life expectancy is 78. People's
financial circumstances are so bad that they think they will be working two
years after they are dead!
TGR: Finally, what is your
investment model?
DS: My investing model is ABCD:
Anything Bernanke Cannot Destroy: flashlight batteries, canned beans, bottled
water, gold, a cabin in the mountains.
TGR: Thank you very much.
David
Stockman is a former U.S.
politician and businessman, serving as a Republican U.S. Representative from
the state of Michigan 1977–1981 and as the director of the Office of
Management and Budget under President Ronald Reagan 1981–1985. He is
the author of The Triumph of Politics: Why Reagan's Revolution
Failed and the soon-to-be released The Great Deformation: How Crony
Capitalism Corrupts Free Markets and Democracy.
Stockman was the keynote
speaker at last weekend's Casey Research Recovery Reality Check Summit. This
event featured legendary contrarian investor Doug Casey, high-end natural
resource broker Rick Rule, New York Times bestselling author John
Mauldin and 28 other financial luminaries. Over the three-day summit, they
provided investors with asset-protection action plans and actionable
investment advice. And even if you were unable to attend, you can still hear
every recorded presentation in the Summit Audio Collection. Learn more here.
Want to read more
exclusive Gold Report interviews like this? Sign up for our free
e-newsletter, and you'll learn when new articles have been published. To see
a list of recent interviews with industry analysts and commentators, visit
our Exclusive Interviews page.
Disclosure:
From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers,
employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for
articles on the site, may have a long or short position in securities
mentioned and may make purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open
market or otherwise.
|