|
|
|
|
|
|
Many
commentators have noted that the so-called "fear gauge," or CBOE
Volatility Index (VIX), a measure of market expectations about near-term
volatility, has been trading at multi-year lows, suggesting that traders are
complacent about the risks ahead.
In fact, a low
VIX has often been the precursor to market corrections and sell-offs over the
past several decades.
But a more
granular reading of the term structure of implied volatility, which shows how
expectations vary at different points in time, offers, perhaps, a more
interesting perspective.
As the
following chart shows, expectations about implied volatility -- essentially,
the relative price of options -- on two widely-followed (and heavily-traded)
ETFs have over the past month fallen much more on a relative basis for
short-term options than for their longer-term brethren, suggesting that
investors have been making an aggressive bet that nothing untoward will
happen in the immediate
period ahead.
 
Arguably, this
low level of concern reflects the fact that traders believe: 1) the Fed will
launch another round of easing (most likely announced around the time of Kansas City
Fed's Jackson Hole symposium at the end of
the month); 2) the ECB and other authorities will do whatever it takes to
prevent any sort of calamity from unfolding in Europe ahead of critical
meetings and other developments set to take
place starting in September; 3) growing turmoil in the Middle East won't
reach a boiling point until well into the fall; 4) or, nothing of any
consequence will happen in the remaining dog days of August because so many
people are on vacation or otherwise sitting on their hands.
For their sake,
let's hope they are right.
Michael J. Panzner
|
|
|
|
|