Chart usGOLD   Chart usSILVER  
 
Food for thought
It is not time that passes, it is you
JLS  
Search for :
LATEST NEWS  :
MINING STOCKS  :
Subscribe
Write Us
Add to Google
Search on Ebay :
PRECIOUS METALS (US $)
Gold 1294.08-0.58
Silver 19.630.01
Platinum 1404.500.00
Palladium 794.900.90
WORLD MARKETS
DOWJONES 16409-16
NASDAQ 40969
NIKKEI 1451699
ASX 544532
CAC 40 443226
DAX 941092
HUI 220-2
XAU 90-1
CURRENCIES (€)
AUS $ 1.4802
CAN $ 1.5214
US $ 1.3811
GBP (£) 0.8224
Sw Fr 1.2201
YEN 141.4700
CURRENCIES ($)
AUS $ 1.0722
CAN $ 1.1021
Euro 0.7241
GBP (£) 0.5956
Sw Fr 0.8833
YEN 102.4300
RATIOS & INDEXES
Gold / Silver65.92
Gold / Oil12.37
Dowjones / Gold12.68
COMMODITIES
Copper 3.040.02
WTI Oil 104.590.83
Nat. Gas 4.740.21
Market Indices
Metal Prices
RSS
Precious Metals
Graph Generator
Statistics by Country
Statistics by Metals
Advertise on 24hGold
Projects on Google Earth
The Out-of-Touch-With-Reality Crowd
Published : December 04th, 2012
588 words - Reading time : 1 - 2 minutes
( 2 votes, 3.5/5 ) , 1 commentary Print article
 
    Comments    
Tweet

 

 

 

 

Here is a brief commentary from Panzner Insights, my members-only website, which I posted earlier today:

 

In “The Biggest Myth About the Fed,”David Beckworth, an assistant professor of economics at Western Kentucky University, suggests that the pessimists are wrong to be concerned about what Mr. Bernanke and Co. are up to.

 

There many myths about Fed policy over the past few years, but the biggest one has to be that the Fed has been monetizing the national debt. This simply is not true, but it does not stop some folks from making this claim. For example, at last week’s Cato Monetary Conference we find former Fed officials pounding the Fed-is-monetizing-the-debt drums:

 

Mr Warsh and Mr Poole (who was filling in for Allan Meltzer) made a sharp distinction between the “legitimate” efforts to fight the crisis and the subsequent easing actions that were, allegedly, unjustified by the economic fundamentals. According to them, the interventions of 2007-2009 were required to ensure that “the markets could clear”, as Mr Warsh put it, while the second round of easing was done to satisfy “political masters” by monetising the debt. In fact, Mr Warsh said that the Fed was being actively unhelpful by “crowding in” Congress’s supposedly poor policy choices.

 

My first response is how can they can say this with historically-low U.S. treasury yields and muted inflation expectations? Surely, if the Fed were truly monetizing the debt we would be seeing a 1970s-repeat in the bond market, but we are not. And this is happening, in part, because the Fed is not that big of a treasury purchaser. Consider the figure below. It shows the Fed’s stock of treasuries by remaining maturity compared to the total stock of marketable treasuries as of the end of October, 2012. Though the Fed’s share of treasuries increases by remaining maturity, at most it hits 32% of the total for 10-30 years category. That means that after many months of Operation Twist that roughly 68% of long-term treasuries are still held outside the Fed. Overall, the Fed holds about 15% of marketable treasuries as seen in the “All Years” category. It is hard to square these numbers with the allegations that the Fed is monetizing the debt.

 

Leaving aside the questions of whether:

 

  • the Fed’s share of the Treasury market will remain as low as it is now if other investors start heading for the hills;
  •  
  • the central bank’s current intentions with respect to their securities holdings will remain the same if the economic, financial, political, or social landscape changes for the worse; or,
  •  
  • we can really know for sure that the debt has been monetized until after the fact;
  •  

the notion that current benign market conditions are a reason for optimism sums up just how out of touch with reality most academic economists (and other alleged experts, including journalists-cum-forecasters who parrot this nonsense) are.

 

By this sort of logic:

 

  • Mid-2005 was the right time to be optimistic on housing
  •  
  • January-2007 was the right time to be optimistic on the banking sector
  •  
  • The spring of 2007 was the right time to be optimistic on credit markets
  •  
  • The fall of 2007 was the right time to be optimistic on global equity markets
  •  
  • Mid-2008 was the right time to be optimistic on commodities
  •  
  • This past September was the right time to be optimistic on technology stocks
  •  

Of course, we know how those all worked out (hint: not well).

 

(Note: for those who are interested, this is a taste of what I touch upon in today’s podcast, “Simple Minds.”)

 

 

 

 

Tweet
Rate :Average note :3.5 (2 votes)View Top rated
Previous article by
Michael J. Panzner
All articles by
Michael J. Panzner
Next article by
Michael J. Panzner
Receive by mail the latest articles by this author  
Latest comment posted for this article
Panzner, The Fed and Wall-Street-Gang are now using Up & Down Quark Math. Up and down quarks have the lowest masses of all quarks. The heavier quarks rapidly change into up and down quarks through a process of particle decay: the transformation from a  Read more
Gypsy - 12/4/2012 at 1:55 PM GMT
Rating :  1  1
TOP ARTICLES
Editor's picks
RSS feed24hGold Mobile
Gold Data CenterGold & Silver Converter
Gold coins on eBaySilver coins on eBay
Technical AnalysisFundamental Analysis

Michael J. Panzner

Michael J. Panzner is a 25-year veteran of the global stock, bond, and currency markets and the author of Financial Armageddon: Protecting Your Future from Four Impending Catastrophes, published by Kaplan Publishing.
Michael J. Panzner ArchiveWebsiteSubscribe to his services
Most recent articles by Michael J. Panzner
2/18/2013
2/16/2013
2/13/2013
1/7/2013
12/19/2012
All Articles
Comment this article
You must be logged in to comment an article8000 characters max.
 
Sign in
User : Password : Login
Sign In Forgot password?
 
 
       
Panzner, The Fed and Wall-Street-Gang are now using Up & Down Quark Math. Up and down quarks have the lowest masses of all quarks. The heavier quarks rapidly change into up and down quarks through a process of particle decay: the transformation from a higher mass state to a lower mass state. This Particle Decay (loss of value) is a Transformation of what - back in the day - was called The Enron Accounting Method. The "Boyz" are doing all they can to KEEP the average Joe-six-pack jumbled in Rocket Science while they rob his 401K.
Rate :   1  1Rating :   0
EmailPermalink
Receive 24hGold's Daily Market Briefing in your inbox. Go here to subscribe or unsubscribe.
Disclaimer