Chart usGOLD   Chart usSILVER  
 
Food for thought
History doesn’t repeat itself, but it does rhyme.
Mark Twain  
Search for :
LATEST NEWS  :
MINING STOCKS  :
Subscribe
Write Us
Add to Google
Search on Ebay :
PRECIOUS METALS (US $)
Gold 1245.95-2.60
Silver 17.34-0.16
Platinum 1264.30-10.45
Palladium 770.25-2.25
WORLD MARKETS
DOWJONES 16615209
NASDAQ 4419103
NIKKEI 15196391
ASX 537361
CAC 40 4080-1
DAX 890821
HUI 191-1
XAU 790
CURRENCIES (€)
AUS $ 1.4442
CAN $ 1.4264
US $ 1.2693
GBP (£) 0.7917
Sw Fr 1.2063
YEN 135.7350
CURRENCIES ($)
AUS $ 1.1381
CAN $ 1.1238
Euro 0.7878
GBP (£) 0.6238
Sw Fr 0.9503
YEN 106.9360
RATIOS & INDEXES
Gold / Silver71.85
Gold / Oil15.22
Dowjones / Gold13.34
COMMODITIES
Copper 3.04-0.02
WTI Oil 81.87-0.09
Nat. Gas 3.71-0.01
Market Indices
Metal Prices
RSS
Precious Metals
Graph Generator
Statistics by Country
Statistics by Metals
Advertise on 24hGold
Projects on Google Earth
In the same category
Forensic Examination of the Gold Carry Trade
Published : May 15th, 2009
1649 words - Reading time : 4 - 6 minutes
( 0 vote, 0/5 ) Print article
 
    Comments    
Tweet

 

 

 

 

Is There A Supply Deficit?

 

If you ask the World Gold Council or their “official numbers keeper” - GFMS – they’ll say there is no persistent gold supply deficit.  If you ask the folks at GATA – they’ll claim there is an annual 1,000 – 1,500 tonne gold supply deficit.

 

So who’s telling the truth?

 

What’s interesting to note in this regard – the World Gold Council and GFMS haven’t always shared the same view regarding gold supply / demand aggregates.  Empirically their positions, at times, have been ambiguously at odds with each other and have lacked continuity.  Here’s how GATA consultant Frank Veneroso explained the disparity back in 2005;

 

“As I explained in the Gold Book, gold demand had been understated for years by GFMS, the ‘official’ keeper of the global gold statistics, as has been the flow of official sector gold. Official stocks were falling faster than the GFMS data would suggest. I presented abundant statistical information to make that case. We believe that the trend in the official data since then simply flies in the face of obvious facts and this discredits it further.

 

People ask us where we think supply and demand are now. Our standard response is that we don’t know, because the data available to us has become ever less reliable. In the old days, the World Gold Council produced a data series on gold demand for most (but not all) of the world. It was based on extensive survey data and it had no reason to be biased. It clearly showed a stronger trend in the growth of gold demand (excluding Western investment) than did the GFMS supply/demand statistics. For us it was an anchor that allowed us to see a growing error in the GFMS data (see the Gold Book).

 

In the 1990s GFMS was faced with a problem. From the late-1980s to the late-1990s, there was a growing flow of borrowed gold associated with speculative short sales, the hedging of central bank options and commercial inventory hedging, in addition to the well recognized producer forward selling. There were also some official sector liquidations that were not reported. These totaled to extremely large official supplies. For some strange reason GFMS refused to acknowledge most of these official supplies, particularly those associated with speculator short sales. This resulted in a gross understatement of annual supplies.

 

Unlike the World Gold Council, which tried to only come up with an estimate of demand, GFMS estimated both supply and demand. In the end GMS had to make their estimates of demand and supply balance. Because they were underestimating supplies to an increasing degree, they had to underestimate demand to an increasing degree to make these accounts balance. That is why the World Gold Council survey showed a stronger gold demand trend in the 1990s than the GFMS statistics.

 

Several years ago the World Gold Council decided to merge its statistical efforts with GFMS leaving us, in effect, with only the GFMS supply/demand estimates. It has been my opinion that the GFMS balances became so flawed by the end of the 1990s that they had become virtually worthless. Therefore, I’ve regarded the new World Gold Council/GFMS statistics in recent years as basically useless. We no longer have any anchor for estimating gold demand and supply.”

 

That Central Banks “swap” and “lease” gold is an undeniable matter of public record.  The extent of this activity is not acknowledged by GFMS or the World Gold Council.  We do know that it necessarily has been responsible for filling any and all recurring gold bullion supply deficits.

 

The bottom line is that Central Banks claim to “officially” have somewhere in the neighborhood of 30,000 metric tonnes of gold bullion in their vaults.  However, the reality is that Central Banks possess LESS physical gold than they officially report – how much less is a matter of speculation and a closely guarded secret.

 

The following formula explains the mechanics of the Gold Carry [lease] Trade:

 

 


 

 

** Do not confuse the Gold Forward Rate [GOFO] with the Gold futures price – they are not related.

 

 

Now, we shall apply our lease rate formula to a “real world” case study where there is plenty of irrefutable evidence that gold leasing occurred; namely, in the aftermath of the Sept. 26, 1999 announcement of the first Washington Agreement on Gold – which was “sold” [as in a bill of goods, perhaps?] to the world as being ‘gold friendly’.

 

In the aftermath of the announcement of original Washington Agreement [WAG], announced Sept. 26, 1999, the World Gold Council reported;

 

“Lease rates jumped to 10% in the first few days after the agreement, and though they have fallen back, they remain at a still high level of 4-5%, more than two times the rate the 1-2% the market is historically used to. The market remains tight, with very little gold coming onto it.”

 

What Happens When Gold Is Leased?

 

When Central Banks lease gold, it PHYSICALLY leaves the vault and the recipient / borrower sells the physical metal into the marketplace to raise cash – to invest or to finance capital expenditures. In this regard, we can say that “GOLD LEASING” is a means by which physical bullion is made available in the market place – thereby lowering the gold price.  After the gold physically leaves the vault of the Central Bank, it is replaced with an I. O. U. and the Central Bank, for accounting purposes, “double counts” by continuing to claim that they still possess the same amount of physical bullion in the vault.  It is notable that fraudulent accounting practices relating to gold is promoted by lawmakers the world over.  This is contrary to generally accepted accounting practices and promotes market opacity instead of the much talked about need for transparency.  Explicitly, it serves to promote the supremacy of the fiat U.S. Dollar as the world’s reserve currency.

 

I’ve circled the 10 % spike in lease rates on the chart below:

 

 

Ladies and gentlemen, what the spike in lease rates above depicts is the INDUCEMENT that was required to get BULLION BANKS to accept the “ELEVATED COUNTERPARTY RISK” inherent in arranging further bullion loans since, in the days following the Washington Agreement, the subsequent rise in the price of gold weakened existing bullion borrower’s financial position and made repayment of their physical bullion loans a trickier proposition:

 

  

The borrowers of bullion pay LIBOR – but in bullion [the relevant month is highlighted in RED]:

 

1-Month

3-Month

6-Month

12-Month

 

January of 1999

4.946

5.032

5.036

5.108

February of 1999

5.003

5.065

5.168

5.405

March of 1999

4.94

5.009

5.083

5.307

April of 1999

4.902

4.993

5.075

5.303

May of 1999

4.93

5.053

5.193

5.503

June of 1999

5.223

5.355

5.633

5.803

July of 1999

5.178

5.32

5.68

5.836

August of 1999

5.370

5.505

5.913

6.023

September of 1999

5.396

6.083

5.974

6.053

October of 1999

5.41

6.218

6.144

6.313

November of 1999

6.503

6.122

6.063

6.261

December of 1999

5.832

6.005

6.136

6.508

 

 

Now, let’s stop and consider WHO did the lending of metal in Sept. 1999 – expelling physical precious metal, intentionally at a loss, in the face of a RISING PRICE of GOLD.  Remember folks, 3 month GOFO [the gold forward rate] is the return “earned” by the lender of bullion:

 


 

So ask yourself WHO would lend physical gold bullion to ANYONE with a guarantee that you would get LESS bullion back in 3 months????????????

 

Sir Alan of “I-looted-the-free-world” Greenspan gave us a good hint as to who might do such a thing when he twice testified before Congress in 1998 that "central banks stand ready to lease gold in increasing quantities [read: lose money] should the price rise."

 

Coincidentally, it is the lack of transparency concerning Central Bank gold leasing and the existence of double counting of gold stocks that, in Dec. 2007, prompted GATA to launch a freedom of information request campaign to wrest all documents from the Fed and U.S. Treasury in their possession that have been generated since 1990 and mention swaps of gold involving the U.S. government.  Heck, even the I.M.F. admits that Central Banks double count gold, excerpted from I.M.F. issues paper # 11, April, 2006;

 

7. The current statistical treatment of gold swaps should be consistent with that of repos. The guidance of paragraph 85 (iii) of the Guidelines, which is applied to gold swaps by paragraph 101, results in overstating reserve assets because both the funds received from the gold swap and the gold are included in reserve assets. While the gold is swapped, it cannot be the case that both the claims and the gold are simultaneously liquid and readily available to the monetary authority.

 

The United States of America claims to possess a little more than 8,100 metric tonnes of sovereign gold stored principally at Fort Knox, Kentucky, West Point, N.Y. and The New York Fed.  The sovereign U.S. gold reserve has not been independently audited since the 1950’s during the Eisenhower Administration.  GATA’s freedom of information requests are all about ensuring that the 8,100 metric tonnes of U.S. sovereign gold is still owned the U.S. and is where it is purported to be.

 

In April, 2008 the Federal Reserve responded to GATA’s request, releasing part or all of hundreds of pages of worthless information, but also claiming that it was withholding all or part of the information of about 400 pages of documents. The status of the withheld documents is currently under appeal.

 

These stonewalling tactics – with holding details - are eerily similar to those employed by Messer’s Bernanke, Paulson and Geithner refusing to divulge frank details as to “who” the beneficial recipients were of TARP and TALF funds.

 

Got physical precious metal yet?

 

Rob Kirby

KirbyAnalytics.com

 

 

All articles by Rob Kirby

 

Subscribers to Kirbyanalytics.com are profiting from paid in-depth research reports, analysis and commentary on rapidly unfolding economic developments.  Subscribe here.

 

 


 

 

 

 

Tweet
Rate :Average note :0 (0 vote)View Top rated
Previous article by
Gold Price Management
All articles by
Gold Price Management
Next article by
Gold Price Management
Receive by mail the latest articles by this author  
Latest comment posted for this article
Be the first to comment
Add your comment
TOP ARTICLES
Editor's picks
RSS feed24hGold Mobile
Gold Data CenterGold & Silver Converter
Gold coins on eBaySilver coins on eBay
Technical AnalysisFundamental Analysis
Most recent articles by Gold Price Management
9/1/2014
7/31/2014
5/22/2014
2/21/2014
1/22/2014
All Articles
Comment this article
You must be logged in to comment an article8000 characters max.
 
Sign in
User : Password : Login
Sign In Forgot password?
 
Receive 24hGold's Daily Market Briefing in your inbox. Go here to subscribe or unsubscribe.
Disclaimer