|
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday’s big news for gold investors and
monetary policy observers was the take-down (that’s certainly the
impression you get from reading the related headlines) of the gold standard
by Fed Chief Ben Bernanke.
In Origins
and Mission of the Federal Reserve, the first in a four-part lecture
series, Bernanke laid out the case against fixing a nation’s money
to such a barbarous relic, offering all the usual arguments about
inflexibility, frequent financial panics, etc. There’s nothing new or
surprising here because a gold standard is anathema to any modern day
economist, but here’s the chart that caught my attention (highlights
added):
 
Perhaps it would have been better to not bring up
price stability at all, since, I don’t see how
you can credibly spin that as being a negative for the gold standard.
While the U.S. experience with hard money was far
from perfect, it resulted in regular bouts of inflation and deflation that,
in the end, worked out to be, basically, zero percent inflation for over a
hundred years, ending in the early-20th century. During that time, the only
serious bout of inflation occurred during the Civil War when the nation
printed pure fiat money called “greenbacks” to pay for the war.
This compares rather favorably to the experience
since the Federal Reserve was founded in 1913, during which time the U.S.
dollar has lost about 98 percent of its value, due primarily to the
Fed’s policies.
|
|
|
|
|