Chart usGOLD   Chart usSILVER  
 
Food for thought
It's better to have a permanent income than to be fascinating
Oscar Wilde  
Search for :
LATEST NEWS  :
MINING STOCKS  :
Subscribe
Write Us
Add to Google
Search on Ebay :
PRECIOUS METALS (US $)
Gold 1396.899.29
Silver 22.600.11
Platinum 1454.50-3.00
Palladium 736.201.20
WORLD MARKETS
DOWJONES 15295-6
NASDAQ 3459-4
NIKKEI 14841358
ASX 5041-101
CAC 40 3967-84
DAX 8352-179
HUI 2592
XAU 97-3
CURRENCIES (€)
AUS $ 1.3342
CAN $ 1.3338
US $ 1.2926
GBP (£) 0.8560
Sw Fr 1.2498
YEN 130.9200
CURRENCIES ($)
AUS $ 1.0322
CAN $ 1.0317
Euro 0.7737
GBP (£) 0.6622
Sw Fr 0.9667
YEN 101.3460
RATIOS & INDEXES
Gold / Silver61.81
Gold / Oil14.54
Dowjones / Gold10.95
COMMODITIES
Copper 3.300.01
WTI Oil 96.05-0.11
Nat. Gas 4.280.02
Market Indices
Metal Prices
RSS
Precious Metals
Graph Generator
Statistics by Country
Statistics by Metals
Advertise on 24hGold
Projects on Google Earth
In the same category 
( 0 vote, 0/5 ) Print article
     
Tweet

Marketwire

 
 
PolyMet Mining Corp.
TSX:POM
AMEX:PLM
Other Recent News

May 20, 2008
PolyMet Updates Capital and Operating Costs

Revised Construction Plans Reduce Pre-Revenue Capital Costs and Time Line

Project Development Update Conference Call: May 21 at 10:30 A.M. EDT

HOYT LAKES, MINNESOTA--(Marketwire - May 20, 2008) - PolyMet Mining Corp. (TSX:POM)(AMEX:PLM) ("PolyMet" or the "Company") reported today that its board of directors has reviewed and approved revised plans and cost estimates for construction and operating costs at its northern-Minnesota copper-nickel-precious metals development-stage project. PolyMet controls 100% of the NorthMet copper-nickel-precious metals ore-body and owns the nearby Erie Plant, located near Hoyt Lakes in the established mining district of the Mesabi Iron Range in northeastern Minnesota.

The revised plans include:

- the sale of concentrate during the construction and commissioning of new metallurgical facilities resulting in a shorter pre-production construction period (under twelve months) and reduced capital costs prior to first revenues ($312 million versus $380 million)

- higher metal prices more than offset higher capital and operating costs, which include substantial additional environmental protection measures

- mine plans (based on copper at $1.25 per pound) reflect the increase in reserves and decrease in stripping ratio reported on September 26, 2007, the use of 240-ton trucks, and owner versus contract mine operations.

Since completion of the Definitive Feasibility Study ("DFS") in September 2006, PolyMet has been focused on providing information to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources ("MDNR") and other permitting agencies in support of the MDNR's preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement. The MDNR remains on target for completion of the draft EIS at the end of June.

PolyMet has assembled a senior management team with the experience and skills to oversee construction and operation of the plant and mine. The Company has also entered into service agreements with three Minnesota-based engineering and construction firms and has undertaken a detailed review of the construction and development plans in order to optimize these activities. As a result, PolyMet believes its project is operationally and financially more robust and provides additional measures to minimize and mitigate environmental impacts.

KEY POINTS

- DFS-equivalent capital costs increase 36% to $516.8 million

- Updated development plan contemplates:

-- additional $85.1 million in measures to protect the environment, increasing the total capital to $601.9 million

-- the initial sale of concentrate during construction and commissioning of the new metallurgical facilities which requires additional handling facilities included in these totals

-- staged construction reduces pre-production capital costs to $312.3 million (including the additional environmental measures) with most of the additional $289.6 million for construction of the metallurgical facilities expected to be funded from operating cash flow

- Break-even cost of producing copper (on a co-product basis) increases to $1.05 per pound compared with $0.81 per pound in the DFS. Increase primarily driven by higher costs of fuel and general inflation. On a by-product credit basis the cost of producing copper falls to a negative $0.28 per pound.

- Based on three-year trailing average metal prices (the SEC metal price deck) the economics have improved compared with the DFS:

-- After tax internal rate of return increases to 30.6% from 26.7% in the DFS

-- After tax net present value of future cash flow discounted at 7.5% increases to $649.4 million from $595.4 million in the DFS.

-- Average EBITDA in the first five years of operation increases to $217.3 million a year from $175.3 million.

CONFERENCE CALL

PolyMet will host a conference call to discuss the Project Development Update at 10:30 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on Wednesday May 21, 2008.


Call-in Numbers:
Canada: +1 (416) 641-6125
Toll Free: +1 (866) 542-4236
International Toll Free: + (800) 7701-8886

Playback:
Canada/International: +1 (416) 695-5800, pass code 3261847
Toll Free: +1 (800) 408-3053, pass code 3261847
 
CAPITAL COSTS

Since the September 2006 DFS, and on a like-for-like basis, the total capital cost has increased by 36% to $516.8 million. This increase reflects both cost inflation and design scope changes since the DFS, including facilities needed to ship concentrate during the construction and commissioning of the new hydrometallurgical plant.

In addition, PolyMet is anticipating $85.1 million of expenditures on measures to protect the environment, over and above the measures contemplated in the DFS. $76.6 million for mining equipment that was assumed to be provided by a mining contract in the DFS has been incorporated as an operating lease in updated operating costs.

PolyMet has previously stated that it has been reviewing the possibility of selling concentrate during the construction and commissioning of new metallurgical facilities. This staged approach shortens the initial construction period, makes the project less sensitive to the delivery schedule for long lead time equipment such as autoclave vessels, and means that PolyMet can commence operations of the mine, the existing crushing and milling plant, the existing tailings disposal facilities, and the new flotation circuit, before starting the new hydrometallurgical plant.

As a result of the staged approach, the total capital required prior to initial production and sales declines to $312.3 million, which includes $64.7 million of additional environmental safeguards for this level of activity.


Capital Costs
(US dollars, millions)

                                                                    Initial
                                               Full     Change  Concentrate
                                            Project   from DFS        Sales

Definitive Feasibility Study                  379.8                   138.7
Escalation and other scope changes            137.0         36%       108.9
                                            -------             -----------
 Total                                        516.8                   247.6

Environmental measures                         85.1                    64.7
 Total change                                 222.1         58%       173.6
                                            -------             -----------
 TOTAL                                        601.9                   312.3
                                            -------             -----------
                                            -------             -----------
 
OPERATING PLANS AND COSTS

The overall mining and operating plan remains the same as that defined in the DFS and which forms the basis of the plan being analyzed in the environmental impact statement. PolyMet intends to mine 32,000 tons of ore per day for an operating life of twenty years, processing a total of 224 million tons of ore.

The mine plan continues to be based on the following metal prices: copper - $1.25/lb, nickel - $5.60 per pound, cobalt - $15.25/lb, palladium - $210 per ounce, platinum - $800 per ounce, and gold - $400 per ounce.

Operating costs per ton of ore processed have increased to $13.33 from $11.02 in the DFS reflecting higher fuel, mine equipment, and other consumable costs, as well as general inflation. The cost of mining and delivering ore to the plant is now estimated at $4.31 per ton compared with $3.80 per ton in the DFS. The increase in mining costs has been partially offset by the lower strip ratio, larger mining equipment, and owner versus contractor operation.

The economic analysis is based on SEC-reserve standards, namely the three-year trailing average, which we calculated at April 30, 2008 (the end of our first fiscal quarter.) This price deck is: copper - $2.90/lb, nickel - $12.20/lb, cobalt - $23.50/lb, palladium - $320/oz, platinum - $1,230/oz, and gold - $635/oz. While these prices are somewhat higher than those used on the economic analysis in the DFS, each price is well below current market levels - in the first quarter of 2008, the following prices prevailed: copper - $3.52/lb, nickel - $13.09/lb, cobalt - $46.37/lb, palladium - $441/oz, platinum - $1,867/oz, and gold - $925/oz.

This translates into copper cash costs of $1.05 per pound using a co-product basis to calculate costs, compared with the DFS estimate of $0.81/lb. Taking revenues from the other metals as a deduction against costs, the co-product basis shows a cost of $(0.28) per pound compared with $0.06 per pound in the DFS.

ECONOMIC SUMMARY

Key economic metrics include earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) which is projected to increase to $217.3 million on average over the first five years of operations from $175.3 million estimated in the DFS. The net present value of future cash flow (after tax) discounted at 7.5% is estimated to be $649.4 million compared with $595.4 million in the DFS, and the after tax internal rate of return is now estimated at 30.6% compared with 26.7% in the DFS. The table below also sets out the affect on EBITDA of a 10% change in each metal price.


Key Economic Highlights

                                                           Update      DFS
                                                           May-08   Sep-06

Operating plan
 Proven and probable reserves                 million t     274.7    181.7
 Ore mined - life of operation                million t     224.0    181.7
 Overburden removed (capitalized
  under site preparation)                     million t      18.5        -
 Waste                                        million t     285.3    302.3

Operating costs per ton processed
 Mining and delivery to plant                       $/t      4.31     3.80
 Processing                                         $/t      8.07     6.75
 G&A                                                $/t      0.94     0.46
  Total                                             $/t     13.33    11.02

Metal price assumptions (SEC-standard)
 Copper                                            $/lb      2.90     2.25
 Nickel                                            $/lb     12.20     7.80
 Cobalt                                            $/lb     23.50    16.34
 Palladium                                         $/oz       320      274
 Platinum                                          $/oz     1,230    1,040
 Gold                                              $/oz       635      540

Economic summary
 Annual earnings before interest, tax,
  depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)
  - average first five years                  $ million     217.3    175.3
 Net present value of future after tax
  cash flow discounted at 7.5%                $ million     649.4    595.4
 Internal rate of return (after tax)                         30.6%    26.7%

 Sensitivity: 10% +/- price equals
  $_ million in EBITDA
   Copper                                     $ million      18.6     15.7
   Nickel                                     $ million      13.3      9.3
   Cobalt                                     $ million       0.9      0.9
   Palladium                                  $ million       1.7      2.0
   Platinum                                   $ million       1.7      2.1
   Gold                                       $ million       0.3      0.5

Copper costs
 cash - co-product method                          $/lb      1.05     0.81
 cash - by-product method                          $/lb     (0.28)    0.06
 
SCHEDULE

The MDNR is on track to complete the draft EIS by the end of June 2008, after which it will be formally published in the Federal Register and State EQB Monitor. Completion of the draft EIS will be the culmination of a multi-year effort involving PolyMet, PolyMet's consultants, multiple governmental agencies and an independent EIS contractor. In addition to providing a detailed project description, PolyMet has submitted more than 100 detailed technical reports to assist those preparing the EIS to assess the environmental impacts of the project and to explore ways to avoid, minimize or mitigate the environmental impacts.

Once the draft EIS is published, non-government organizations, government agencies, and the public will have an opportunity to comment during a 30-day state and parallel 45-day federal public comment period. The final EIS will incorporate analysis and appropriate responses to comments, a process that can take several months. The final EIS also has an opportunity for public comment during a 15-day state and 30-day federal comment period. Once the EIS receives a declaration of "adequacy" from the State and "record of decision" from the federal government, the various permits required for construction can be issued. It should be noted that the government agencies that participate in preparing the EIS are the same agencies that will be responsible for preparing the permits that PolyMet will need before the Company can commence construction.

Promptly upon issuance of permits, PolyMet plans to start construction. Detailed construction scheduling shows the mine could deliver ore to the plant in less than a year from the start of construction. As production and sales of concentrate are ramped up, PolyMet plans to complete construction and commissioning of the new hydrometallurgical facilities within approximately eighteen months. Much of the capital costs of the new facilities are expected to be funded from cash flow from the sales of concentrates during this initial period.

MINNESOTA SERVICE AGREEMENTS

PolyMet has entered into service agreements with three Minnesota-based engineering and construction firms which will provide specialized expertise combined with local experience:

Barr Engineering: headquartered in Minneapolis, MN with offices in Duluth, MN and Hibbing, MN, Barr employs approximately 400 engineers and scientists with a strong emphasis on environmental matters. The firm will focus on mine pre-development such as the design and construction of haul roads, stockpile foundations, waste water treatment, overburden stripping, and tailings dams.

Ames Construction: headquartered in Burnsville, MN, the firm is one of the largest heavy civil and industrial design-build general contractors in the US, with expertise in mine development, mine facility construction, landfill construction, and environmental remediation. Ames will initially work with PolyMet and Barr in the detailed planning of mine site development, prior to the commencement of construction upon receipt of permits.

Krech Ojard: headquartered in Duluth, MN with offices throughout the U.S., the firm provided specialist advice to Bateman Engineers in connection with the DFS assessment of the railroad requirements for moving ore from the NorthMet mine site to the Erie plant site. The construction role includes design engineering services for the rail transfer hopper and the new and re-activated rail lines, both between the mine and the plant and rail within the plant site.

Joe Scipioni, President and CEO stated, "Our acquisition of the Erie Plant and our location in an established mining district reduce our exposure to capital cost inflation, which is proving to be a significant challenge for many mine development projects around the world. While we are not immune to rising energy costs and the weakness of the dollar, we believe that we are more competitive on the world stage today than we were when the DFS was completed in 2006."

He continued, "Since the completion of the DFS we have been planning the construction and start-up phase as well as optimizing the overall project. The biggest single change relates to measures to protect the environment. In planning to spend an additional $85 million on environmental protection, we believe that we are addressing concerns of the local community and the permitting agencies."

He concluded, "With completion of the draft EIS scheduled for the end of June, we will be advancing through the public review period and permitting, as well as detailed planning for construction. Everyone is working diligently to make sure that the project moves forward and is done properly."

PolyMet Mining Corp. (www.polymetmining.com) is a publicly-traded mine development company that controls 100% of the NorthMet copper-nickel-precious metals ore body through a long-term lease and owns 100% of the Erie Plant, a large processing facility located approximately six miles from the ore body in the established mining district of the Mesabi Range in northeastern Minnesota. PolyMet has completed its Definitive Feasibility Study and is seeking environmental and operating permits to enable it to commence production. The NorthMet project is expected to require approximately one million man hours of construction labor and create at least 400 long-term jobs, a level of activity that will have a significant multiplier effect in the local economy.

POLYMET MINING CORP.

Joe Scipioni, President

This news release contains certain forward-looking statements concerning anticipated developments in PolyMet's operations in the future. Forward-looking statements are frequently, but not always, identified by words such as "expects," "anticipates," "believes," "intends," "estimates," "potential," "possible," and similar expressions, or statements that events, conditions or results "will," "may," "could," or "should" occur or be achieved. These forward-looking statements may include statements regarding exploration results and budgets, reserve estimates, mineral resource estimates, work programs, capital expenditures, timelines including timelines for third-party studies and issuance of permits to operate by various government agencies, strategic plans, the market price of metals, costs, or other statements that are not a statement of fact. Forward-looking statements address future events and conditions and therefore involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated in such statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors. PolyMet's forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, expectations and opinions of management on the date the statements are made, and PolyMet does not assume any obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or management's beliefs, expectations and opinions should change.

Cautionary note to U.S. investors: the terms "measured and indicated resource", "mineral resource", and "inferred mineral resource" used in this news release are Canadian geological and mining terms as defined in accordance with National Instrument 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101") under the guidelines set out in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (the "CIM") Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves. We advise U.S. investors that while such terms are recognized and required under Canadian regulations, the Securities & Exchange Commission does not recognize these terms. Mineral Resources do not have demonstrated economic viability. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of a Mineral Resource will ever be upgraded to Reserves. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of or be included in feasibility or other studies. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part of an inferred mineral resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.

Specific reference is made to PolyMet's most recent Form 20-F/Annual Information Form on file with the SEC and Canadian securities authorities for a discussion of some of the risk factors and other considerations underlying forward-looking statements.


The TSX has not reviewed and does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

CONTACT INFORMATION:

PolyMet Mining Corp.
William Murray
Executive Chairman
(604) 669-4701
Email: wmurray@polymetmining.com

or

PolyMet Mining Corp.
Joe Scipioni
President & Chief Executive Officer
(218) 225-4417
Email: jscipioni@polymetmining.com

or

PolyMet Mining Corp.
Douglas Newby
Chief Financial Officer
(646) 879-5970
Email: dnewby@polymetmining.com

or

PolyMet Mining Corp.
LaTisha Gietzen
VP Public, Governmental and Environmental Affairs
(218) 225-4417
Email: lgietzen@polymetmining.com
Website: www.polymetmining.com

INDUSTRY: Manufacturing and Production - Mining and Metals

Footer

Tweet

Polymet Mining Corp

CODE : POM.TO
ISIN : CA7319161021
Follow and Invest
Add to watch list Add to your portfolio Add or edit a note
Email Alert Add to Watchlist Add to Portfolio Add Note
ProfileMarket
Indicators
VALUE :
Projects & res.
Press
releases
Annual
report
RISK :
Asset profile
Contact Cpy
Your feedback is appreciated, please leave a comment or rate this article.
Rate : Average note :0 (0 vote) View Top rated
 
In the News and Medias of Polymet Mining Corp
5/3/2011PolyMet to delay annual report filing
2/2/2009Russian gold roundup - production decline reversed
7/5/2008Duluth Complex: A World-Class Value Play
9/7/2006Follow up
Financings of Polymet Mining Corp
12/6/2011Closes $20 Million Private Placement With Glencore
11/30/2011and Glencore Agree to Extend Debentures
1/18/2011Closes First $10 Million Tranche of Glencore Financing
1/18/2011Polymet Closes First $10 Million Tranche of Glencore Financi...
11/12/2010and Glencore Agree to Extend Debentu =?ISO-8859-1?Q?res,=20C...
11/17/2009Modifies Terms of Existing Glencore Warrants
Nominations of Polymet Mining Corp
3/15/2011Expands Board of Directors
1/25/2011Names Brad Moore Executive VP-Environmental and Governmental...
12/31/2010Announces Board Reorganization
3/13/2007Appoints Chief Operating Officer and NorthMet Senior Constru...
Financials of Polymet Mining Corp
12/10/2012Reports Third Quarter Fiscal 2013 Results
9/7/2012Reports Second Quarter Fiscal 2013 Results
6/18/2012Reports First Quarter Fiscal 2013 Results
9/8/2011Reports Second Quarter Fiscal 2012 Results
7/6/2011Reports First Quarter Fiscal 2012 Results: Update on State o...
5/7/2011Announces Fiscal 2011 Full-Year Results
1/17/2011Announces Fiscal 2011 Third Quarter Results
5/2/2009PolyMet Reports Fiscal 2009 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Res...
5/1/2009Reports Fiscal 2009 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Results
4/30/2008Reports Fiscal 2008 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Results
Project news of Polymet Mining Corp
6/2/2011(Northmet)s Status of Environmental Review
2/3/2011(Northmet)Simplifies Metallurgical Process at NorthMet Project
9/26/2007(Northmet)Reports a 51% Interim Increase in Reserves at NorthMet
8/9/2007(Northmet) Reports a 51% Increase in Mineral Resources at NorthMet
7/10/2007(Northmet) Drill Program Confirms Expansion of "Magenta" Zone and Demo...
Corporate news of Polymet Mining Corp
4/10/2013US$60 Million Common Share Rights Offering to All Shareholde...
11/19/2012Completes Key Project Milestones
10/15/2012Closes $10 Million Third Tranche of Glencore Financing
10/15/2012Closes $10 Million Third Tranche of Glencore Financing
7/15/2011Closes Second $10 Million Tranche of Glencore Financing
12/16/2010Loan From Iron Range Resources Approved
12/14/2010Announces Delay in Filing Interim Financial Statements
11/12/2010Agrees to Sell US$30 Million of Common Shares to Glencore
10/13/2010Federal Agencies Publish Notice of Intent for PolyMet EIS
6/25/2010EIS-Path Forward to Completion Announced
3/15/2010Statement on Environmental Review Timeline
3/4/2010Environmental Review Process Clarified
2/23/2010s NorthMet Environmental Review Progress
1/26/2010Receives Second Installment From Glencore
11/24/2009Closes Financing-Project Update
11/17/2009Sells US$25 Million of Common Shares to Glencore
10/28/2009Environmental Impact Statement Published
10/5/2009Draft EIS Available the Week of October 19, 2009
10/1/2009s EIS Publication Schedule
9/2/2009Draws Fourth Tranche of Loan From Glencore
8/27/2009Files US$500 Million Universal Shelf Registration
6/19/2009Draws Third Tranche of Loan From Glencore
5/5/2009Project Update
3/18/2009Project Update
12/24/2008Draws Second Tranche of Loan From Glencore
12/22/2008Receives Draft EIS From Department of Natural Resources
10/31/2008Completes Strategic Agreements With Glencore
10/10/2008Warrant Exchange Accepted
9/24/2008EIS and Glencore Update
9/4/2008and Glencore Sign Strategic Marketing Agreement
8/12/2008Minnesota DNR Updates PolyMet EIS Progress
6/12/2008s EIS Progress
6/2/2008Present at the New York Society of Security Analysts' 8th An...
5/20/2008Capital and Operating Costs
2/15/2008Updates EIS Schedule for Its Copper-Nickel-Precious Metals P...
2/5/2008Strengthens Minnesota Focus
11/5/2007Present at Third Annual Sanders Morris Harris Investor Growt...
10/4/2007Hosts Analyst and Investor Tour
9/14/2007Quarterly Financials
9/4/2007Signs Northmet Construction Labor Agreement
8/21/2007Expands NorthMet Management Team
5/16/2007Updates NorthMet Environmental Review
5/7/2007Research Capital Report
5/7/2007Announces Retirement of Warren Hudelson Receives Approval fo...
3/21/2007Financial Adviser Engages NorthMet Independent Engineer
Comment this article
You must be logged in to comment an article8000 characters max.
 
Sign in
User : Password : Login
Sign In Forgot password?
 
Latest comment posted for this article
Be the first to comment
Add your comment
TORONTO (POM.TO)AMEX (PLM)
1.18-2.48%1.15-2.54%
TORONTO
CA$ 1.18
05/23 15:46 -0.030
-2.48%
Prev close Open
1.21 1.20
Low High
1.17 1.20
Year l/h YTD var.
0.900 -  1.24 29.67%
52 week l/h 52 week var.
0.730 -  1.24 42.17%
Volume 1 month var.
5,400 -%
24hGold TrendPower© : 47
Produces
Develops
Explores for
 
 
 
Analyse
Interactive chart Add to compare
Interactive
chart
Print Compare Export
You must be logged in to use the porfolio and watchlists (free)
TOP NEWSRELEASES
Annual variation
DateVariationHighLow
20135.36%
20124.67%1.500.66
2011-48.06%2.611.00
2010-25.36%3.891.33
2009206.67%3.570.72
 
5 years chart
 
3 months chart
 
3 months volume chart