Close X Cookies are necessary for the proper functioning of By continuing your navigation on our website, you are accepting the use of cookies.
To learn more about cookies ...
In the same category

A Cottage Industry in Measuring Against “Potential” GDP

IMG Auteur
Published : February 14th, 2013
302 words - Reading time : 0 - 1 minutes
( 0 vote, 0/5 )
Print article
  Article Comments Comment this article Rating All Articles  
Our Newsletter...
Category : Crisis Watch

How do you get a number to look small? Compare it to a big number.

How do you get a number to look big? Don’t use a real number, use one that represents the “potential” value of that number – even if this “potential” value assumes the repeat of conditions that no one really wants repeated, such as successive and very destructive asset bubbles in the U.S. and/or global economy.

That’s what passes for conventional wisdom amongst the dismal set these days and its spreading into the mainstream financial media as there now seems to be a cottage industry in measuring things against “potential” GDP rather than the real thing, the latest example being this story at the Washington Post.

This graph shows total private fixed investment relative to the nation’s potential GDP, going back to 1949. (That’s how much the private sector is spending on both houses and commercial installations). After averaging 15.5 percent from 1949 to 2007, private investment fell as low as 10.6 percent in the economic collapse starting in 2008 (it was 12.2 percent at the end of 2012).

24hGold - A Cottage Industry i...

In other words, for the last few years private construction activity has been far below its historic norms. And so long as the private sector isn’t building houses and office buildings and factories, the government can build without crowding out private investment.

As it turns out, you don’t need to compare to “potential” GDP to make the case stated above.

A quick trip over to the vast data repository of the St. Louis Fed known as FRED (where it’s really pretty neat what you can do) produces about the same result using GDP or potential GDP. I guess the point here is that it’s become commonplace to compare things to our past bubble economy rather than the economy itself.

<< Previous article
Rate : Average :0 (0 vote)
>> Next article
Tim Iacono is the founder of Iacono Research, a subscription service providing market commentary and investment advisory services specializing in commodity based investing.
WebsiteSubscribe to his services
Latest comment posted for this article
Be the first to comment
Add your comment
Top articles
Latest Comments
05 Octovertheedge
"To wit, the “sixth sigma” similarity of Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday’s silver and “Dow Jones Propaganda Average” charts." When you tro...
Not Enough Gold To Pay All Holde...
03 OctDirk
Have a look at this
Another Case of Market Manipulat...
02 OctDirk
I have studied manipulation by central banks and cannot find any strong evidence that there is manipulation.
Gold and Silver Update
29 Sepjustatrader
Hi Florian, good analysis. But don't you think have a stop at 1120 would be detrimental to the longer term upside bias? It is a great level of supp...
Congress and the Fed Refuse to L...
29 Sepsonora691
Great idea!! Audit the Fed, and while we're at it, let's get someone to audit the gold vaults in Fort Knox and at the Federal Reserve's gold storag...
In Defense of Gold
29 Sepsonora69-1
In 1933, President Roosevelt outlawed the ownership or possession of monetary gold by any US individual, partnership, association or corp...
29 Sepsonora69
In 1933, President Roosevelt outlawed the ownership or possession of monetary gold by any US individual, partnership, association or corp...
Gold and Silver Update
28 Sepjustatrader
In hindsight i feel stupid for exiting at 1150 from 1125. I like your bold statement but i think a dip to 1100 is likely... im watching that level ...
Most commented articlesFavoritesMore...
World PM Newsflow
Comments closed