Close X Cookies are necessary for the proper functioning of 24hGold.com. By continuing your navigation on our website, you are accepting the use of cookies.
To learn more about cookies ...
EnglishFrench

Austrian economics in 2013

IMG Auteur
Published : January 18th, 2013
555 words - Reading time : 1 - 2 minutes
( 7 votes, 3.3/5 ) , 1 commentary
Print article
  Article Comments Comment this article Rating All Articles  
0
Send
1
comment
Our Newsletter...

24hGold - Austrian economics i...Regular readers of my articles either have some knowledge of Austrian economic theory or at least suspect that Keynesian and monetarist alternatives are flawed. Their failures are becoming more evident, which suggests we will hear more of Austrian theory in 2013. So how is Austrian theory different? Consider the following simple propositions in accordance with Austrian theory, which we can confirm from personal experience:

  • Free market prices are always set by consumers through their choice to buy or not to buy and at prices which give them value. It follows that prices of everything in a free market economy obey this rule, otherwise product is simply unsold.
  • No economist can foresee the path of economic progress, which is only revealed by entrepreneurs correctly anticipating what people want.

Mainstream economists are confused by the whole subject of prices, concluding that production costs and marginal consumer demand between them set prices. This allows the mathematically-minded to draw supply and demand curves. They then contradict themselves by saying that falling prices discourage demand, because consumers will delay their purchases hoping for lower prices. And they fail completely to accommodate in their calculations the consumer who simply decides not to buy something at any price.

On the second proposition, since no economist can foresee progress, they substitute for it growth. Growth is simply more money in the economy, usually contrived out of thin air by central and commercial banks. It is perfectly possible, indeed more than likely, for an economy to “grow” while regressing, when for example the state decides to take money from productive citizens and spend it less productively.

Intellectual ignorance of both price theory and what constitutes economic progress leads mainstream economists into believing that their science can be dehumanised. They resort to statistical analysis, appropriate only to physical as opposed to natural science. They assume that yesterday’s prices, reflecting past supply and demand, can be projected forward to tomorrow, giving economic planners the basis to intervene to produce a better outcome. This assumption has its mere thread of validity by eliminating progress from calculations altogether.

This is behind many inconsistencies, such as how can we all be better off when 10% of the work force is unemployed. And how are we better off with government providing us with many of the necessities of life instead of the market, when our personal experience tells us of costly bureaucracy and levels of service we would not otherwise tolerate?

It is a plain fact that we have allowed ourselves to be deluded into thinking that what we know to be true is not true and that the statistics economists produce as evidence are irrelevant and self-serving. Does anyone with half a brain actually believe the politicians, backed by the cleverest economic advisors the system can produce, when they say they can improve life with someone else’s money?

Austrian economic theory tells us the truth about these and other fallacies. The great Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises remarked with full justification that the only correct declaration to come out of the neo-British Cambridge school (Keynesianism and monetarism) was Keynes’s statement that in the long run we are all dead.

So I urge anyone who even suspects they are being bamboozled by the state to make the effort to understand the virtues of free markets, sound money and Austrian economics.

Thanks to Alasdair Macleod from www.goldmoney.com
Companies Mentionned : Cambridge |
<< Previous article
Rate : Average note :3.3 (7 votes)
>> Next article
FinanceAndEconomics.org is the website of Alasdair Macleod, who has a background as a stockbroker, banker and economist. Alasdair is available for seminars, speeches and interviews. Please check on Services to get further detalils.
WebsiteSubscribe to his services
Latest comment posted for this article
Well said. I only have a problem and it is with this statement: "They resort to statistical analysis, appropriate only to physical as opposed to natural science." Economics, in this usage, is not a natural science. It is a pseudo-science. Science provi  Read more
overtheedge - 1/20/2013 at 5:45 PM GMT
Rating :  2  4
Top articles
Latest Comments
First Report since April, 2014
05 FebAndy_K1
Jason, One of your articles written way back is one of the reasons I started paying attention to silver and shortly thereafter started to ...
Something has Changed in Gold St...
06 Febneville
No nothing strange has happened in GOLD stocks....absolutely nothing.....The fact of the matter is that you byrne have been playing the man and...
The Revisionist Theory and Histo...
05 Febovertheedge
"The key is in the hand of the U.S. government. It is the same key that was used to lockthe U.S. Mint to silver in 1873, and to gold sixty years la...
First Report since April, 2014
05 FebS W.1
Here I was just 2 days ago thinking whatever happened to that evangelical silver guy. Low and behold up he springs, like some spirit from the g...
LBMA Silver “Price”: A Perfect S...
03 FebS W.
There is no doubt that the Comex can be used as a casino for those who want to trade Silver up/or down or maybe some just wish to take a small punt...
LBMA Silver “Price”: A Perfect S...
30 JanOzSILV1
Bron refuses to EVER admit this market is a Casino and the disconnect between Paper and Physical is a big clue to this
LBMA Silver “Price”: A Perfect S...
30 JanS W.
Usually I enjoy Bron's take on things,but to be perfectly honest, I can't understand 95% of what he his on about here. I get the feeling that h...
ANOTHER NAIL IN THE U.S. EMPIRE ...
30 JanDemosthenes0
Very naive and pretentious article! The author thinks he knows everything and yet knows next to nothing. Shale gas producers are neither stupid n...
Most commented articlesFavoritesMore...
World PM Newsflow
ALL
GOLD
SILVER
PGM & DIAMONDS
OIL & GAS
OTHER METALS
Mining Company News
Lara Expl.(Cu-Zn-Au)LRA.V
Revised Resource Estimate Report Filed for Maravaia Copper Gold Deposit
CA$ 0.32+0.00%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Black HillsBKH
Black Hills reports 4Q loss
US$ 50.90-0.59%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Kinder Morgan(Oil)KMP
Midstream Companies Were above the 20-Day Moving Averages
US$ 102.03+1.98%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Kinder Morgan(Oil)KMP
Midstream Companies Were above the 20-Day Moving Averages
US$ 102.03+1.98%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Devon Energy(Ngas-Oil)DVN
Gasoline Inventories Rose Last Week despite Fall in Production
US$ 21.63-4.55%Trend Power :
Corporate news
United States Steel(Fe-Sn)X
U.S. Steel (X) States Ratification of Labor Agreements
US$ 7.08-3.54%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Black HillsBKH
4:34 pm Black Hills Corp beats by $0.04, misses on revs; guides FY16 EPS below consensus
US$ 50.90-0.59%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Black HillsBKH
Black Hills Corp. Reports 2015 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Results
US$ 50.90-0.59%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Transcanada PipelinesTRP.TO
TransCanada to Sign Substantial Agreement to Benefit Québec Economy
CA$ 48.65+0.16%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Devon Energy(Ngas-Oil)DVN
4Q15 Crude Oil Prices: Fallout for the Energy Sector and SPY
US$ 21.63-4.55%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Comments closed
  All Favorites Best Rated  
Well said. I only have a problem and it is with this statement:
"They resort to statistical analysis, appropriate only to physical as opposed to natural science."

Economics, in this usage, is not a natural science. It is a pseudo-science.
Science provides the mechanism to acquire knowledge. Knowledge is tested by application. The better the knowledge base, the more predictable the outcome. Deux ex machina has no place in science and the running results in economics calls its application there into question as well.

The reason economics, as we are defining it, is not a science is quite simple. Every party to the economic system can make and apply their own rules of acquisition. All sciences are consistent. Economics isn't.

But you are correct about the application of statistics as their analytical tool of confusion.
Rate :   2  4Rating :   -2
EmailPermalink