California, Illinois on Brink of Pension Crisis; New Actuarial Rules Will Force States to Admit Prob

Many states, especially California and Illinois, have had severe pension underfunding problems for many years.

However, new actuarial pension rules will finally force states to admit the problem. Thus, it should not be surprising that talk of "technical bankruptcy" and “service insolvency” is growing.

Here are some pertinent ideas from California on the Brink: Pension Crisis About to Get Worse

• Moody’s new credit standards for public pensions would nearly double the unfunded liabilities for state and local pension plans in California to $328.6 billion from $128.3 billion.
• California has the second lowest credit rating at Standard & Poor’s of all 50 states; Illinois now has the worst. Moody's new standards would drop the funded status of these plans to 64%, versus a previous estimate of 82%, the Center said.
• “By standard accounting methods, some state pension funds will run out of assets within as little as five years”
• New rules will lower expected rates of returns on their pension assets, instead of the often overstated returns they now use to paper over holes in their plans blown out by bad investments.
• Meredith Whitney says California is papering over budget holes with gimmicks, like raising taxes retroactively, pushing state expenses onto local towns and cities that can’t afford them, and underfunding their pension funds. "It’s so much worse than the rosy picture that the headlines suggest,” the CEO of Meredith Whitney Advisory group says.
• The Senate Joint Economic Committee reiterates what Whitney says. “Many states and localities have regularly skipped or underfunded contributions to pension plans,” the report said. “Over the past five years, state and local governments have underpaid actuarially required pension contributions by more than $50 billion. The worst culprit of all, Illinois, has underpaid its pension contributions to the tune of $28 billion over the past 15 years.”
• Illinois’ plan is just 44% funded, or 30% using “conventional accounting standards,” the Senate committee says. Los Angeles’ combined plans would fall from 77% funded to 50% funded.
• San Jose’s combined plans would fall from 75% to 60% funded.
• San Francisco’s combined plans would fall from 88% funded to 69% funded.