EU Emissions Trading in Tatters (As It Should Be)

IMG Auteur
Published : May 16th, 2013
333 words - Reading time : 0 - 1 minutes
( 1 vote, 1/5 ) , 1 commentary
Print article
  Article Comments Comment this article Rating All Articles  
0
Send
1
comment
Our Newsletter...
Category : Opinions and Analysis

The Wall Street Journal reports Emissions trading in Europe in Tatters.

The European Union's flagship program to fight global warming—a regional carbon-emissions trading system—suffered a major blow Tuesday when legislators rejected a proposal aimed at saving the market from collapse.

After the European Parliament's rejection, spooked investors drove the already depressed price of carbon emission permits down by nearly half. Benchmark electricity prices also fell. Europe's Emissions Trading System, launched in 2008, was intended to protect the environment by raising the cost of polluting and encouraging businesses to invest in cleaner technologies.

Slack demand for electricity because of the recession and an abundance of permits helped push the price of emitting a ton of carbon below €5 ($6.60) earlier this year, from nearly €30 in 2008.

On Tuesday, the price dropped to €2.55 before recovering partially to €3.20.

Without some intervention to reduce supply, "the ETS will almost certainly collapse," said Kash Burchett, a London-based analyst at consulting company IHS Energy.

"Prices will likely sink below €1 per ton as participants recognize that there is no political will at present to restore the market mechanism to functioning order," he said.
Scheme Flawed From the Start

"Today's vote is a historic failure," said Joris den Blanken, EU climate policy director at environmental advocacy group Greenpeace.

Really? No not really.

Today's vote is one of the few common sense things the EU has done in years. Giving existing polluters credits that they could sell, and credits that new polluters had to buy, is preposterous.

Hopefully this will bury the idea forever, but don't count on it. Please note that I am not praising pollution. I am against this method of doing something about it.

I also disagree with the entire concept of man-made "global warming" in the first place. Even if it exists, the odds that government will do something reasonable about it is close to zero.

For further discussion of EU clean energy silliness, please see Paul Krugman "Was" Right.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
<< Previous article
Rate : Average note :1 (1 vote)
>> Next article
IMG Auteur
Mish 13 abonnés
Mike Shedlock / Mish is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management. He writes a global economics blog which has commentary 5-7 times a week. He also writes for the Daily Reckoning, Whiskey & Gunpowder, and has over 80 magazine and book cover credits. Visit http://www.sitkapacific.com
WebsiteSubscribe to his services
Comments closed
  All Favorites Best Rated  
Global warming or not we treat this planet atrociously. At least the EU tried to do something about it.

What does the US do? They TRASH their once awesome and beautiful land for monetary gain so that they can spread their political disease to any country weak enough to listen, via war mongering and outright theft. and then laugh at the EU for making an effort to do something right?

Oh well, how can one expect the fattest gluttons on earth to realise that you shouldn't shit in your own swimming pool?


Rate :   1  1Rating :   0
EmailPermalink
Latest comment posted for this article
Global warming or not we treat this planet atrociously. At least the EU tried to do something about it. What does the US do? They TRASH their once awesome and beautiful land for monetary gain so that they can spread their political disease to any countr  Read more
dom1971 - 5/17/2013 at 1:42 AM GMT
Rating :  1  1
Top articles
World PM Newsflow
ALL
GOLD
SILVER
PGM & DIAMONDS
OIL & GAS
OTHER METALS