Fiat Money – Eastern Europe

IMG Auteur
 
From the Archives : Originally published May 14th, 2012
2743 words - Reading time : 6 - 10 minutes
( 3 votes, 4/5 ) , 1 commentary
Print article
  Article Comments Comment this article Rating All Articles  
0
Send
1
comment
Our Newsletter...
Category : History of Gold

 

 

 

 


From the silver Joachim’s Thaler...




....to the paper Tolarjev



Most commentators on how Fiat money always reverts to its intrinsic value, (i.e. approaching the value of the paper it is printed on, or near zero), quote the german Papiermark, (observe the pictured 5 trillion bank note in this link) as a classic example of this phenomenon.

The Papiermark was replaced by the Reichsmark in 1924 at the rate of 1 trillion PM to 1 RM.

(Note : 1 english billion = 1 german Milliard and 1 english trillion = 1 german Billion)

The apochryphal stories from this hyper inflationary period are typified by the one where a man loads up a wheelbarrow with trillions of PM’s and stops outside a bakery to buy some bread. On exiting the shop he discovers that somebody has stolen his wheelbarrow, but only after tipping out the worthless bank notes which are left at his feet in the street.

(Fiat money is defined in this context as paper money, not linked to specie, ie gold or silver. The use of Fiat money enables a government or issuing central bank to issue as much new money as they wish, unrestricted by any link to gold. The result is usually an inflation and loss of value of the paper money in commodity buying power corresponding to the amount of new paper issued.)

This essay will deal with another aspect of fiat money, namely the monetary turbulence in Eastern Europe, (EE) in the 1990’s resulting from the political changes in the aftermath of the collapse of the Soviet Union.

The author travelled extensively in the East Block from 1992 to 1995, and has drawer loads of worthless fiat money as souvenirs of his visits to prove it.

It was a fascinating time to visit these EE countries, who were struggling valiantly to convert from the communist economic model to capitalism.

They were on a very steep learning curve and looking out for willing teachers to aid them in making the transition. The author found himself inadvertently thrust into this role, but despite the fundamental differences between the two systems, the « students » were very quick to learn and adapt.

The author commenced his EE marketing project by making a short list of the countries most likely to be able to make this transition quickly, and also, which countries were most likely to require new sources for supplies of the raw materials that he was selling. Finally the most important criterium was to find company propsects who were sufficiently credit worthy to become accepted by his credit control department as new customers, or who would accept to pay cash in advance.

The next task was to find the best possible agents in each country.

Slowenia

In Slowenia in 1992 the author was very fortunate to find and engage as his agent an ex member of the Yugoslavian National government, who was a Slowenian national and had excellent local contacts in his home state.

The war in the north of Yugoslavia had lasted only 10 days, and after the withdrawl of the army, Slowenia declared its independence, although international recognition took some time to arrive.

On the author’s first visit to Ljubljana, (the capital) in 1992, the government had hastily printed some new money, but because of lack of agreement on the new name for the currency, the notes contained only numbers on pictorial backgrounds, but no currency name or symbol !

(Authors note : How close to (the game of) Monopoly money can you get)

Returning on his second visit a month or so later, he was disappointed to learn that in the interim, the government had decided on the new name Tolarjev, and had issued another new series of bank notes. ( see the comparative images of the two notes above)

The Tolar (plural Tolarjev) was yet another new derivative from the stem of the dollar, via the Thaler.

Dollar From "thaler" -- a nickname for the silver coins that were minted from the ore found in Joachimsthal ("Saint Joachim's Valley" in German), Bohemia (part of the current Czech Republic) -- which gained "currency" (pun not intended) shortly after the lode's discovery in 1516. At that time, Bohemia was part of the Holy Roman Empire and that with the assumption to the throne of Charles V of Austria (and I of Spain), the territories of the Holy Roman Empire were united with those of Spain (including the Spanish New World possessions), Burgundy, and the Low Countries until 1556. This fact leads to the second half of the story: the Joachims' "thaler" was one of the major coins in use not only in the Old World but also in the New World as well, at least until the major silver strike at San Luis de Potosi (Bolivia) and the major gold strike at Zacatecas (Mexico). Furthermore, throughout the rest of the Colonial era, the nickname "thaler" (which eventually became "dolar" in Spanish and "dollar" in English) would remain in use as the nickname for any silver coin that represented exactly one piece of eight (By the way that is where the symbol for the dollar "$" came from--it is the number "8" broken up with a slash down the middle). The term also later made its way into the United States in 1803 when President Thomas Jefferson sought to create a national currency to supplant the various state, local and private currencies then in use. At the time the United States had trade deficits with almost every nation with whom it traded, except for one: Mexico. Due to a sizeable trade surplus with Mexico, the United States government found itself with a sizeable quantity of Spanish Colonial silver "thalers" which it then proceded to use as the basis for the new currency: the U.S. dollar. The dollar sign came from the back of the Spanish Colonial dollar you mention on your page: the pillars on the back (representing the Pillars of Hercules, the land beyond to which the Spanish owed their wealth) with a banner that wove around them in an "S" shape.

R. Dickerson adds/corrects: Your site has two different explanations for the origin of the dollar sign: the first one wrong, the second one correct but incomplete. The proposal that the dollar sign comes from drawing a line down the figure "8" to divide it into "pieces of eight" is totally off base. Instead, Medieval Spaniards were quite proud of the idea that they sat at the very far end of the civilized world, which to them meant the Mediterranean. The narrow straits leading from the Mediterranean to the Atlantic ocean were flanked by mountains, and these were known as the "Pillars of Hercules" after a story from Greek mythology. The Spanish royal coat of arms of the time had a shield, flanked by two pillars. These pillars had decorative ribbons around them, wound in opposite directions, with the legend "Ne Plus" at left and "Ultra" at right. "Ne plus ultra" meant "Nothing beyond". But then Columbus came along and expanded everybody's world. Spain became even prouder of the fact that they now were the portals to a new world. So the "Ne" was dropped from the ribbon at the left of the coat of arms, and the inscription read "Plus ultra", or "More beyond". The ribbons were wound around their pillars just like the "S" in the dollar sign is wound around its uprights. This full royal coat of arms flanked by pillars, whether inscribed "Ne plus ultra" or the later "Plus ultra", was the obverse of the dollar-sized 8 Reales coin, with the king's head on the reverse. I was formerly a serious coin collector, and still have a couple of examples of these 8 Reals, which served as the model in size for our dollar coin. The 8 Real coins circulated widely in Florida and the Caribbean prior to the Revolusion, and would have been familiar to American colonials. It is my feeling that the new nation elected to pattern its monetary unit after the Spanish 8 Reales rather than the British Pound, as a sign of independence from the mother country. The One-Real piece was a small silver coin, also called a "bit". That is why our quarter-dollar has come to be known as "two bits". END

On attempting to spend the few banknotes remaining from his first visit in Slowenia, he was informed they were no longer legal tender and so they were relegated to a drawer of souvenirs, where they were soon to be joined, as we will see later, by other colourful but decreasing in worth pieces of paper.

As a result of the breakup of Yugoslavia, Slowenia’s industry had lost some 50% or so of their raw material suppliers, and a similar % of their customers, who were all located further south in Serbia and the other ex Yugoslavian countries, where the war was still sporadically in progress in some form or another.

Consequently there was an urgent need to replace both these suppliers and customers.

The most obvious solution was to look further north in Western Europe.

On the authors arrival with his agent at a large factory near Ljubliana, the President of the company, who by chance happened to be celebrating his birthday, was told that a representative from a potential new western European supplier (of raw materials no longer available from the south) had just arrived in reception.

We were immediately summoned to the boardroom for a more than joyous reception. After several glasses of wine the meeting proved so successful that an agreement appeared to be in view to supply some of the missing raw materials.

To celebrate the author invited 6 of those present to dinner in what turned out to be one of the best restaurants in Ljubljana.

After downing an obligatory Slivowitz with a plumb in the glass, mounds of Adriatic prawns, frogs legs,and snails were consumed, before going on to the main course, and all washed down with a few bottles of wine. Following deserts and coffees, the author was becoming slightly nervous as to what amount the bill would be, and whether he had enough money in the current legal tender of the day to cope with it. Imagine his relief when the total for 6 persons came to the equivalent of approximately US$ 50.

From 1992 to 1995 the author returned regularly to Ljubljana, and on each occasion he got the impression that the prices at the same restaurant, (and elswhere in the city, but not in the villages surrounding the capital) doubled every 6 months or so, although this memory may well have become befogged by the excellent quality and service of the establishment. Apparently learning how to adopt to the capitalist system was not so difficult as (the author) had at first thought.

Czechoslovakia

The author visited Prag a dozen or so times during the period 1992 to 1995. The prices of hotels and restaurants escalated dramatically during this period of rapid transition from communism to capitalism. Tourism was expanding rapidly, for the excellent reason that the old city of Prag is one of the most unspoiled jewels of Europe, both west and east. The period architecture is not interspersed with ugly modern buildings as in most other european cities. The total effect is harmonius and beautiful, giving the impression that one is observing the city as it was several centuries ago, (if one ignores the modern traffic on the roads of course). By 1995 the prices of tourist related necessities, hotels and restaurants in Prag had increased to a level comparable to that of Muenich or other german cities, for example.

However, on visiting small towns and villages 100 kms or so distant from Prag, price levels were still at the much lower level that had existed in the country before the return to capitalism.

On my second visit to the Czech Republic, the split of Czechoslovakia into 2 countries was well underway. The Czech government had not yet had time to print new banknotes, so they had over stamped the existing ones « Czech Republic ». The old (unstamped) czechoslovakian notes from my first visit were no longer valid.

A few months later however, new notes had again been issued, this time replacing Czechoslovakia with Czech Republic, and once again the stamped ones had ceased to be in circulation. More paper souvenirs for my worthless currency collection.

Slovakian Republic

The Tupolev jet airliner from Prag to Svit ran into turbulence as we approached the Tatra mountains. The author reluctantly handed back the sandwich and glas of wine to the stewardess, who amazingly was still able to walk despite the severe turbulence, explaining that he had not been able to manoeuvre his hand close enough to his mouth for the last ten minutes to enjoy the snack. As we landed on the short runway in cross winds, there was a bang as we hit the runway, a massive roar from the engines maximum reverse thrust, and several banging noises in the cabin as seat backs crashed forward in unoccupied seats. The first thought was that we had crashed, but apparently it was just a normal landing in extremely difficult weather conditions on a short runway. No wonder they say east block pilots are among the best in the world! In these conditions they certainly proved it.

The Russian black chauffeur driven limousine (vintage 1956 ?) met the author at the airport. Its worn slick summer tires proved inadequate for the ice covered roads in February in the Tatras, and gave the impression its movement resembled a viennese waltz as we slalomed over the black ice.

He was given a warm reception by his hosts, and stayed in a private hotel with restaurant, and personal service which rivalled or bettered the best one could expect in the west, a pleasant surprise after the somewhat difficult journey. By midnight after tasting the famous Tokay 1 and 2 and politely refusing to try the number 3, he retired to bed, reflecting it was amazing how many new experiences one could pack into 24 hours, and the excitement of all the cultural differences between eastern and western Europe.

The Slovakian fiat money evolution exactly mirrored that of its ex partner in the Czech Republic, and once more the authors collection of obsolete money grew, as the Slowacks went through similar monetary mutations on each of my successive visits.

Poland

Suffice it to say that the change in 1992 from buying small items was sometimes paid in 500'000 Zloty notes. The zloty resembled other currencies about to go into orbit by governments who lacked the will or the necessity to arrest the inflation of their legal tendered currency. But at least they did not change the name or unit of the currency during the authors visits. He was greatful for small mercies, until in 1995 monetary reform replaced 10'000 old zloty’s with 1 new zloty.

The complex monetary history of Poland also describes the debasement of coins, as was common practice generally before paper money was introduced, but at least this process was slower than the high speed printing press equivalent involved in the debasement of paper money in modern times !

Conclusions

  • The author’s collection of colourful worthless banknotes from Eastern Europe is a constant reminder that Fiat money often has a short and dangerous life span in many countries.
  • History provides many examples of how fiat money has enabled a government to inflate its way out of fiscal problems usually to the detriment of the unsuspecting public, who are forced to use the money as legal tender.
  • Silver and gold coins (denominated by weight and not in $ or other fiat currency terms) are timeless, and do not necessarily require replacement on every change of government or nationhood.
  • The original silver « JoachimsThaler » survived longer and retained its value better than the paper fiat currencies which followed it over the centuries and borrowed its name : from the dollar to the tolarjev !
  • The recent monetary history of EE related in this essay provides yet another argument to consider returning to silver and gold in species in some form to avoid the abuses of paper monetary systems.
  • Why not bring back the Joachim’s Thaler, even if now we may have to mine the silver in Mexico, because the deposits in the Joachim valley were depleted a long time ago?

 

 

Data and Statistics for these countries : Austria | Bolivia | Czech Republic | Poland | Serbia | All
Gold and Silver Prices for these countries : Austria | Bolivia | Czech Republic | Poland | Serbia | All
<< Previous article
Rate : Average note :4 (3 votes)
>> Next article
Alan Leishman is now retired in Switzerland following a career in international commerce which was prematurely terminated by a globalisation takeover. An interest in Geology, Mineralogy, and Gemmology developed after graduating in Chemistry at Edinburgh University. His collection of minerals, which was on display for 6 years (until 2003) at the National Museums of Scotland in Edinburgh, was put together by visiting mines, mineral fairs and dealers in over 30 countries, over a period of 20 years. He is also a keen naturalist with interests in bird watching, and butterflies.
Comments closed
  All Favorites Best Rated  
First person experiences are always interesting! What frustrates me about articles that talk about "fiat money" is that they usually never discuss the causes of the failure other than to say the government just prints a lot. They also use terms like "currency" to describe coins! In 1792 the money was coin only. The comment above "President Thomas Jefferson sought to create a national currency to supplant the various state, local and private currencies then in use." doesn't fit with the 1792 Coinage act. Paper money is prohibited by the Constitution (read James Madison's notes on the COnstitutional Convention 'Bills of Credit'). "Currency" is a note that is "current" and payable. It is NOT script like the paper money described above. Money is "Fiat" because the government declairs it to be money by fiat. Not because it is made of paper. A silver certificate that is redeemable by contract is NOT "fiat" money. Back to the cause...All of the paper "money" systems fail because they are created using debt. When the debt is paid the money is then destroyed. HOWEVER, the money to pay the interest on the debt is NOT created and requires the issuance of more debt to pay the accruing interest. Eventually the compounding of the interest makes the debt burden too great to support. This causes all sorts of economic dislocations and the attempts to keep the system functioning causes hyper inflation and the eventually descruction of the "money". The governent does not just print the money, They BORROW IT from the BANKSTERS who either print it or, like in the U.S., they print it, give it to the BANKSTERS and then BORROW IT BACK! Insanity! Not to mention criminal.
Rate :   4  0Rating :   4
EmailPermalink
Latest comment posted for this article
First person experiences are always interesting! What frustrates me about articles that talk about "fiat money" is that they usually never discuss the causes of the failure other than to say the government just prints a lot. They also use terms like "cur  Read more
JoeS - 6/20/2012 at 3:21 PM GMT
Rating :  4  0
Top articles
World PM Newsflow
ALL
GOLD
SILVER
PGM & DIAMONDS
OIL & GAS
OTHER METALS