Close X Cookies are necessary for the proper functioning of By continuing your navigation on our website, you are accepting the use of cookies.
To learn more about cookies ...
In the same category

Fincen's New Regulations Are Choking Bitcoin Entrepreneurs

IMG Auteur
Published : May 02nd, 2013
966 words - Reading time : 2 - 3 minutes
( 0 vote, 0/5 )
Print article
  Article Comments Comment this article Rating All Articles  
Our Newsletter...
Category : Crisis Watch

More than a decade ago, regulators nearly suffocated PayPal. Now it looks like they’re trying to squelch another disruptive, innovative payments system.

At least three exchanges in the U.S. that traded the digital currency Bitcoin have shut down, apparently as a result of
guidance issued last month by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. That agency has emerged as the top threat, at least in in the United States, to the decentralized Bitcoin network – moreso than the widely reported price volatility and hacker attacks.

"They've been the single biggest factor for stomping out currency competition," says
Bradley Jansen, a former assistant to Rep. Ron Paul and director of the Center for Financial Privacy and Human Rights. Speaking recently on The Daily Bitcoin podcast with Adam Levine, Jansen expressed surprise at how little focus bitcoin business leaders are putting on Fincen, especially considering how regulators thwarted earlier emerging payment systems like PayPal and e-gold. PayPal obviously survived and prospered – but only after selling itself to eBay and agreeing to put restrictions on its service. E-gold was not so fortunate.

"Fincen was able to stop currency competition with technical innovations in the 90s even before their expanded powers under the U.S. Patriot Act. And, what we've got now is a Fincen on steroids without clear restrictions from Congress," Jansen says.

The guidance requires certain intermediaries that handle virtual currency to register with Fincen as money services businesses, which entails recordkeeping and reporting responsibilities. And it says some of those businesses may additionally be money transmitters, which would mean fingerprinting of directors and officers and compliance with a patchwork of state licensing requirements.

Jansen postulates that the recent Fincen virtual currency guidance was issued ex post facto as a way to set the stage for potential prosecutions in the future.

"It's a failure of Congress to do its job. We knew that these guidelines and these prosecutions were in the works even last Congress. Ron Paul was the chairman of the House subcommittee that had jurisdiction over Fincen and he never had a single hearing on this."

In a recent
speech, Fincen Director Jennifer Shasky Calvery said the new guidance aims "to protect [digital currency] systems from abuse and to aid law enforcement in ensuring that they are getting the leads and information they need to prosecute the criminal actors." She reiterated that the guidance does not apply to everyday users who pay or accept bitcoin for goods and services.

But by saddling startups with compliance requirements, and making them unattractive clients for regulated banks that despair of serving MSBs, Fincen is choking these businesses that facilitate conversion of bitcoins into dollars. Fewer exchanges and more red tape will make it harder for merchants or consumers (who, after all, must still pay the bills with dollars) to take advantage of the Bitcoin payment system’s speed, privacy and competitive costs.

On March 20 – just two days after the guidance from Fincen came out – the bitcoin exchanger
suspended operations indefinitely. Bitme was a relatively small operation, but it was widely suspected among bitcoin users in online forums that this closure resulted from difficulties related to potential regulatory compliance.

BTC Buy, another bitcoin exchange site,
suspended services and closed permanently in early April, specifically citing the legal uncertainty brought up by the Fincen guidance.

Most recently, the largest bitcoin exchange to
halt trading was Bitfloor, run by Roman Shtylman, who blamed "circumstances outside of our control." His New York operation had average daily trading volume of about $300,000 (depending on the exchange rate), with U.S. dollar deposits and withdrawals running through a Capital One bank account – which the bank unilaterally closed.  "I had very little time to act between receiving the account closure letter and the account being closed," Shtylman told PaymentsSource.

In this case, the regulatory guidance may have had an indirect effect. Bitfloor was registered with Fincen as an MSB but was not licensed as a state money transmitter. Shtylman surmised that Capital One had judged his business to be "not worth the risk."

Across the Atlantic and presumably unrelated to Fincen, Poland-based Bitcoin-24 suspended trading after
the government there froze its bank account. It reportedly did so because a bank in Germany complained of compromised accounts transferring stolen money without identification to Bitcoin-24. Also, U.K.-based TransferWise, a foreign currency intermediary, ceased transfers to any bitcoin exchanges at the request of its banking partners. TransferWise had mostly been servicing customers in the U.K., Poland, and Spain.

It will be interesting to watch how Fincen intends to treat one-way, fixed-rate brokers that either buy or sell bitcoin at a fixed price. Since a two-way exchange market is not involved it could be seen as merely a typical commodity purchase or sale.

Tangible Cryptography LLC, which
registered as an MSB this month, operates FastCash4Bitcoins for selling bitcoins and Bitcoins Direct for private off-exchange purchases. The two businesses function independently of each other and neither is technically an exchange. Bitcoins Direct is frequently closed to new clients and its cash deposit feature was recently cancelled.

The fact that bitcoin survives at all with so many powerful
forces lined up against it is a testament to its resiliency and tenacity. Now, in addition to the vicious press coverage and persistent denial of service attacks on exchanges, the emerging cryptographic money has to contend with onerous and targeted regulation.

With respect to bitcoin and financial regulation, Jansen warns: "I think the lesson from the 90s was that you either become what Fincen wants you to be or you're not going to be."

Not in the U.S., that is. But jurisdictional competition will kick in and overseas exchanges will gain market share and liquidity. They just may not have U.S. customers.

By Jon Matonis
American Banker
Thursday, April 25, 2013

Companies Mentionned : Patriot |
Data and Statistics for these countries : Germany | Poland | Spain | All
Gold and Silver Prices for these countries : Germany | Poland | Spain | All
<< Previous article
Rate : Average :0 (0 vote)
>> Next article
Jon Matonis is an Austrian School economist focused on expanding the circulation of nonpolitical digital currencies. He argues that what is about to happen in the world of money is nothing less than the birth of a new Knowledge Age industry: the development, issuance, and management of private currencies.
Latest comment posted for this article
Be the first to comment
Add your comment
Top articles
Latest Comments
Another Case of Market Manipulat...
02 OctDirk
I have studied manipulation by central banks and cannot find any strong evidence that there is manipulation.
Gold and Silver Update
29 Sepjustatrader
Hi Florian, good analysis. But don't you think have a stop at 1120 would be detrimental to the longer term upside bias? It is a great level of supp...
Congress and the Fed Refuse to L...
29 Sepsonora691
Great idea!! Audit the Fed, and while we're at it, let's get someone to audit the gold vaults in Fort Knox and at the Federal Reserve's gold storag...
In Defense of Gold
29 Sepsonora69
In 1933, President Roosevelt outlawed the ownership or possession of monetary gold by any US individual, partnership, association or corp...
29 Sepsonora69
In 1933, President Roosevelt outlawed the ownership or possession of monetary gold by any US individual, partnership, association or corp...
Gold and Silver Update
28 Sepjustatrader
In hindsight i feel stupid for exiting at 1150 from 1125. I like your bold statement but i think a dip to 1100 is likely... im watching that level ...
BEWARE: What If This Retail Silv...
25 Sepovertheedge
I only gave you three stars and here is why. "However, the important factor to understand is that most investors go after the WELL KNOWN produc...
Gold Daily and Silver Weekly Cha...
25 Sepjustatrader1
Hi Jesee, I came across this site from Zeal LLC and stumbled upon your blog (don't see anywhere to comment so i'm back here). Anyways, just a t...
Most commented articlesFavoritesMore...
World PM Newsflow
Mining Company News
Prb Energy(Oil)PRB
Stock Market Update ...
US$ 24.61+0.07%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Consumers Energy, Grand Valley State University Break Ground on State's Largest Community Solar Project
US$ 35.61+1.95%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Victory Nickel(Ni-Pa)NI.TO
Victory Nickel Granted Extension for Delisting Review by the TSX
CA$ 0.02+0.00%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Piedmont Natural Gas' John Monaghan Awarded N.C.'s Order of the Long Leaf Pine
US$ 40.63+1.52%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Timmins Gold(Au-Ag)TMM.TO
Timmins Gold Reports Small Tear In New Leach Pads
CA$ 0.34+1.47%Trend Power :
Corporate news
National Fuel Gas Co.(Oil)NFG
Winter Heating Season Bills in Western New York will be the Lowest in 14 Years
US$ 51.06+2.37%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Atmos EnergyATO
Zacks Industry Outlook Highlights: Edison International, Atmos Energy, Consolidated Edison and WGL Holdings
US$ 58.93+1.92%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Prb Energy(Oil)PRB
How Does Cantel Medical Compare to Its Peers?
US$ 24.61+0.07%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Prb Energy(Oil)PRB
How Does Costco Compare to Its Peers?
US$ 24.61+0.07%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Victory Nickel(Ni-Pa)NI.TO
TSX Delisting Review - Victory Nickel Inc. (Symbol: NI)
CA$ 0.02+0.00%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Comments closed