|
Bull markets do not move in a
straight line, nor do the price of gold and silver. Their price
advances, and then retreats to ‘correct’ the previous advance.
For the past four weeks, gold and silver have been going through one of these
periodic price corrections.
During these corrections,
underlying support is tested. If support holds, precious metal prices
eventually climb higher, putting in the rear-view mirror the prices reached
during the test of support as well as the correction itself.
This pattern of ebb-and-flow has
recurred time and again over the past ten years, during which time both gold
and silver have achieved spectacular price appreciation. Some
corrections have been long and deep, like the one that occurred after the
Lehman Brothers collapse. Others though have been short and
shallow. But they all have one common characteristic.
The depth and length of a
correction cannot be predicted. All we market participants can do is
let the correction run its course, while continuing to accumulate the
precious metals as part of our ongoing accumulation plan to cost-average our
purchases.
Although the severity of a
correction cannot be predicted, there are clues that sometimes give an
indication that a correction is ending. One of these is called a
“bullish divergence”. Importantly, gold and silver have
formed promising bullish divergences.
To explain this point, gold and
silver prices normally move in synch. Both advance, or both
decline. What is of interest is when one metal moves in one direction
to achieve a new price, while the other metal does not confirm. So for
example, if gold makes a new high and silver does not confirm with its own
new high, a bearish divergence has formed, signaling that a price advance may
be ending and a correction may be starting.
Conversely, when one metal makes a
new correction low and the other one does not confirm, a bullish divergence
has formed. It is an indication that a correction is ending.
The bullish divergences gold and
silver have formed over the past four weeks can be seen by comparing the
following two charts, which present the daily high, low and closing price of
gold and silver over the past several months. The dotted horizontal
line marks Friday’s closing price.
Several observations can be made
about the above charts:
1) From their late January low,
both metals moved higher together more or less in synch.
2) Both gold and silver began their
correction on the same day. In the initial drop, gold made its low on
May 5th, but silver kept falling and made its initial low one day later on
May 6th. It was a small bullish divergence because gold did not confirm
the new low in silver, and both metals subsequently bounced higher.
3) The precious metals then
re-tested their previous low. Silver fell to a new low in the setback
on May 12th, but gold did not confirm. This was a second bullish
divergence, and more meaningful than the first one a few days earlier for the
simple reason that gold’s initial low price was still holding firm and
had not been broken.
4) Then the precious metals again
re-tested their lows a few days later. On May 17th gold broke below its
May 12th low but not the low of May 5th, which has held throughout the
correction. Silver broke below its May 6th low, but not the low reached
on May 12th. It was the third bullish divergence, and this testing and
re-testing of support in effect indicated that support at those price levels
was solid. Both gold and silver again bounced higher, and their price
rally continues as I write.
So gold and silver have formed what
promise to be important bullish divergences signaling that the correction may
have run its course. Here’s another way to look at what has
happened. The selling in a precious metals correction can be compared
to a prize-fighter at the end of a tiring bout. He is punched-out, and
can hardly fight anymore. A divergence says the same thing. In
effect, the downside momentum has ended because the sellers no longer have
any ‘punch’ left.
There is one other item worth
noting in the above charts, and it too is bullish. Look at the depth of
the correction in silver compared to that of gold. Silver retraced more
than half its gain from the January low, but gold hardly retraced any.
What’s more, gold is now just a chip-shot away from making a new record
high. This relative performance is itself an important bullish
divergence.
So taking it all together, there
are clear signals that the correction in the precious has ended. In
other words, the low in gold and silver reached earlier this month marks the
bottom of the correction. There may be more testing of support
around $1500 and $35, which would not be unusual. There may even be
more bullish divergences. But look favorably at the bullish divergences
already formed because they in essence are saying that the correction may be
ending, and more to the point, that the long-term bull market in the precious
metals remains intact.
Lastly, the eagle-eyes among you
may have noticed the bearish divergence on the above charts. Gold made
a new high on Friday, April 29th, but silver did not confirm. A nasty
correction began the following week.
In summary, spotting divergences is
a worthwhile endeavor. Like everything else when it comes to markets,
divergences are not foolproof. But they are a useful analytical
technique that everyone can use to help keep their eye on price trends in a
bull market.
James
Turk
All data and quotes sourced from Reuters. Originally Published by
Goldmoney. All rights reserved.
|
