|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold and silver prices
posted very strong finishes to the end of
last week, and look like they could at
long last be at the start of a significant trending move higher. Gold gained 3.46% over the week, with silver recording
an impressive 8.98% weekly gain. The white metal has broken above an important resistance level at $30, and judging from the price action this morning looks like it could launch
a quick assault on $32.50 – a level that marked
stubborn resistance for much of the first half of this year.
Over at KingWorldNews,
commodity guru Dan Norcini
notes the rash of short covering
that took place in the silver market last week. He points to $35-$35.50 as the last “line in
the sand” for these
speculative shorts, and thinks
that we could see a huge
new influx of money on the long side of the market if this
price level is bested. $40 will then be
in play again.
The story is similar
in gold. If the yellow metal
rises above $1,700, we can expect
to see speculators dashing to cover their short positions. Aside from the increasing likelihood that the Federal Reserve is getting ready to launch another money printing scheme within the next few weeks, gold bugs have also been encouraged by chatter
about the Republican National Convention (due to meet
in Tampa this week, barring problems with hurricanes) including a plank in the convention platform
calling for a “gold commission” to study the feasibility of relinking the US dollar to gold.
Of course, a similar congressional commission was convened in the early 1980s,
and to nobody’s great
surprise endorsed the (non gold standard) status quo. Given the restraints that a genuine gold-dollar link would impose on federal spending, it is in fact
almost inconceivable to
imagine Washington voluntarily agreeing
to return to a gold standard. But even accounting for these caveats and the fact that this latest
idea probably owes more to Romney-Ryan trying
to secure votes from Ron
Paul supporters (many of whom
will be tempted to stay at home on election day), it is
at least encouraging to see gold once again becoming a mainstream
discussion point.
Less encouraging
are the continuing misconceptions
fostered by lazy and/or
ignorant journalists about gold’s
use as money. But that’s a discussion for another article.
|
|
|
|
|