In his recent speech to the U.S. Congress Pope Francis
declared that “the common good is the chief aim of all politics” and that
“freedom requires love of the common good.” Legislation is “always
based on care for the public,” the pontiff pontificated. Only a naïve
child could believe such a thing.
The pope said these things in the context of imploring
the Congress to adopt some kind of Soviet-style central planning of the economy
in the name of “fighting global warming,” while simultaneously exploding
American welfare state spending by extending welfare benefits to all welfare
parasites from every Third World nation on the planet. Thus, if
“Catholic social teaching” stands for anything these days, it stands for
international socialism and egalitarianism gone wild.
In the context of politics there is no such thing as “the
common good,” for such a concept implies unanimity and politics is never
unanimous, especially in a country of over 300 million people.
Moreover, if everyone agrees on a course of action, then there is no need for
government to coerce us into doing it. There is no need for government
at all in such instances.
As Ludwig von Mises pointed out in his book, Liberalism, the only sense in
which “the common good” or “the public interest” makes any sense is in the
case were property rights are well protected. Secure property
rights, wrote Mises, is the shortest road to peace and prosperity. All
legislation, however, is an attack on property rights because it invariably
involves the placement of widely-dispersed burden on the majority for the
benefit of a well-organized minority or special interest. All
legislation is the result of rent- or plunder-seeking by special-interest
groups or by the state itself in order to expand its powers and
budgets. As such, all politics is the mortal enemy of anything that can
be construed as “the common good,” exactly the opposite of the pope’s declarations.
Politics is the ultimate “robbing Peter to pay Paul” scam. Peter,
the hapless taxpayer, is effectively blindfolded so that he can be robbed for
the benefit of Paul, the greedy special interest who kicks back some of the
loot to his political patrons in the form of votes and “campaign
contributions.” Peter is “blindfolded” by the tricks of deficit
spending and money printing, which hide the true costs of government, as well
as the concentrated benefits/dispersed costs gambit whereby a small tax is imposed
on the many to finance large benefits for the few and well connected.
Politics is thus never based on “care for the public,” as the pope
said. It is based on the self-interest of politicians. Their “chief
aim” is not “the common good,” but keeping their jobs and expanding their
pay, perks, and powers, the public be damned.
The rhetoric of “the common good” began with the French philosopher
Rousseau, the intellectual godfather of communism and hater of private
property. The common good, said Rousseau, is something that is known to
an elite in society. This special knowledge supposedly gives them the
right to impose their will on all others. The communists certainly took
this idea to an extreme, slaughtering tens of millions of dissenters, but all
statists, including Pope Francis, rely on the same rhetoric. They rely
on repetition, obfuscation, and rhetorical game playing instead of terror and
mass murder to get the public to acquiesce in their plans for international
socialism with themselves, the world elite, in charge.
When socialism collapsed once and for all in the Soviet empire and
elsewhere in the late 1980s/early 1990s socialist intellectuals did not just
throw in the towel. Many of them took the advice of the
socialist/environmentalist guru Barry Commoner, who wrote in The New Yorker
magazine that socialists should no longer advocate central planning in the
name of helping “the people.” People Schmeople. It should be
sold, said Commoner, in the name of “saving the planet” from capitalism.
Thus, the “watermelons” were born – green on the outside, red on the
inside. The pope is a recent convert to watermelon socialism with his
embrace of the “global warming” hysterics’ agenda. Religious figures
like himself were always looked upon by Machiavellians like Commoner as
useful idiots, to borrow the phrase from Stalin. They send the message
that socialist central planning is somehow God’s will – as though humans can
know what is in God’s mind.
If American welfare spending explodes by extending benefits to millions of
new Third World peasant immigrants, the Catholic Church stands to make a
killing. Catholic Charities receives more than half of all of its
revenue from government grants. As a recipient of these grants, it
is forbidden from teaching Catholicism to the beneficiaries of its
“charity.” It is a welfare state conduit, which goes a long way toward
explaining the pope’s wild enthusiasm for Third World immigrants. It is
the same agenda, in fact, of Ted Kennedy, the author of the 1965 federal immigration
law that greatly reduced immigration quotas from Northern Europe while
opening up the flood gates of Third World immigrants who Kennedy knew would
be reliable Democratic voters/welfare parasites (See Peter Brimelow, Alien
Nation).
If the Congress were to adopt the pope’s agenda of socialist central
planning in the name of “saving the planet,” coupled with the
internationalization of the American welfare state, it would be charting a
course to become a Third World country. At that point the socialist
intellectuals –and perhaps even a future pope – would inevitably blame it all
on “capitalism.”
