regional government debt is in focus again. Spanish 10-year government bond
yields are trading near 7.5% as Spain's central government is expected to
bail out its regions - and in return may ask for a bailout itself. Guarantees
don't make a system safer, quite the opposite: everything is safe until the
guarantor itself is deemed unsafe. While the failure of any one business of
regional government is a tragedy, providing a guarantee puts the system as a
whole at risk.
consists of 17 autonomous regions, whose total debt almost doubled in the
past three years. Technically, Spanish law forbids the central government
from rescuing regional government (in much the same way that the Maastricht
Treaty prohibits bailouts of EU countries). The debate on whether the central
government should take more control over regional budgets and provide
guarantees/bailouts has intensified since January, when the central
government implicitly helped Valencia, one of the most indebted regions, with
a €123 million loan repayment to Deutsche Bank:
- Though the central government is
prohibited from rescuing regional governments and it denied it has done
so, El Pais (Spain's highest-circulation daily
newspaper) reported earlier this year that the Spanish Treasury provided
implicit guarantee and help to Valencia in repaying the loan to Deutsche
Bank. The central government advanced its regular transfers to Valencia
by about 10 days to January 3rd. On the next day, Jan. 4th, Valencia was
reported to have repaid the loan. It can be viewed as the first implicit
bailout from the central government in Spain.
In an effort
to impose more control over the spending of regional governments, the Spanish
Council of Ministers approved a draft of a Stability and Sustainability Law
in late January; one provision is that the central government could oversee
the budgets of the 17 autonomous regions and establish penalties for those
who do not meet the balanced budget targets (all regions missed the
deficit-to-GDP target of 1.5% last year). Not surprisingly, the provision
created strong controversy. Socialist-led regions (i.e. Catalonia) criticized
the provision harshly, while some conservative-ruled regions (i.e. Valencia)
backed the plan. The criticism didn t stop Catalonia to ask for delays in handing tax payments
to the central government.
In May, in a
clear sign that troubles for the regions were escalating, Valencia, one of
the most troubled regions, was forced to pay what was considered a punitive
6.8% yield to roll over €500 million for six months, more than six
times the Spanish Treasury had to pay on the comparable-maturity at the time.
By now, the yields have further risen to around 20%.
A highly decentralized budget system
- Spain is divided into 17
autonomous regions due to historical reasons and cultural differences.
- Regional governments have
historically been granted significant control over spending. They take
charge of education, health and social services, which account for 50%
of total government expenditures.
- Regions also have the power to
authorize or veto the issuance of public debt.
- The central government has
little ability to interfere regional government spending, but is
prohibited by Spanish law to bailout regional governments.
Mismatch in regional fiscal autonomy
- While regions enjoy high
autonomy on spending, the central government retains effective control
over regional government revenue.
- For 15 out of the 17 regions,
the central government retains all powers over the collection and
regulation of important taxes (i.e. corporate income tax, import duties,
payroll taxes). Regional government revenues mainly come from the
central government's conditional grants and ceded taxes (set at central
level, but collected at regional level). Central grants vary from year
to year; they are designed to address regional imbalances. And for some
of the ceded taxes, these regions only retain a small share (i.e. 35%
for VAT and 50% for personal income tax) after collection.
- Only two regions are close to
the maximum fiscal autonomy. They have full powers over a number of
major taxes and retain 100% of ceded taxes.
Regional debt accumulation
- As a result of the economic
recession and housing market collapse, all 17 regions experienced a
significant rise in debt. By 2011, the total debt of 17 regional governments
rose to 140 billion, accounting for 13.1% of Spain's GDP. This number is
up from 6.7% by 2008.
- 10 out of 17 regions'
debt-to-regional-GDP ratio exceeded 10% (versus 2 out 17 by 2008). All
regions missed the deficit-to-GDP target of 1.5% last year.
- The most indebted region,
Catalonia, recorded a 20.7% debt-to-regional-GDP ratio and 3.6%
deficit-to-GDP ratio in 2011. Catalonia s 10-year bond yield exceeded
14% at its peak in June.
- The 2nd indebted region,
Valencia, delayed repayment of a 123 million loan to Deutsche Bank in
January. Subsequently, the region's credit rating was downgraded by
Moody's to junk and it failed to raise 1.8 billion in a bond auction in
March. Valencia is a Mediterranean region with many beach-front
properties; its economy collapsed after the housing bubble bust.
Valencia was the first region to say it would into a new Spanish government
fund to meet its debt-refinancing obligations, as well as to pay suppliers.
With that, the Spanish government is now clearly on the hook for the regions'
debt. Not surprisingly, the market is pricing in that reality. Trouble is
that Spain's central government does not have the credibility that it has
sufficient influence to turn the regions' finances around. Unless the Spanish
government can assure the markets that it can deliver sustainable budgets -
for itself and now the regions as well - it will simply go deeper into the
molasses and risks taking the Eurozone with it. And while Spain certainly
tries to advance its structural reform, the headlines coming out from the
region suggest Spain might be more interested in the European Central Bank
(ECB) intervening to help out Spain's cost of borrowing. As long as debt is
merely shuffled around, the Eurozone crisis won't be solved. And as long as
ever more guarantees are provided - from regional to national governments,
from supranational issuers such as the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) to
the International Monetary Fund, the more the global financial system as a
whole may be at risk.