Close X Cookies are necessary for the proper functioning of 24hGold.com. By continuing your navigation on our website, you are accepting the use of cookies.
To learn more about cookies ...
EnglishFrench
In the same category

The Economics of Disaster

IMG Auteur
Published : November 06th, 2012
464 words - Reading time : 1 - 1 minutes
( 18 votes, 4.5/5 ) , 1 commentary
Print article
  Article Comments Comment this article Rating All Articles  
0
Send
1
comment
Our Newsletter...

 

 

 

 

Hurricane Sandy was one of the worst natural disasters the east coast has ever seen. Clean-up and recovery will take months, if not years and estimates run in the tens of billions of dollars. Parts of New York and New Jersey will never be the same. Entire seashore communities have been wiped out, but the determination to rebuild has been lauded as courageous and admirable. Yet as with all natural disasters, Sandy raises uncomfortable questions about the extent to which taxpayers should fund the cleanup and the extent to which government programs create moral hazards.

For example, FEMA and the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) are expected to pick up the tab for much of the flood damage caused by the hurricane. Of course this will mean more federal debt and inflation for the rest of us, since the program only has about $4 billion to work with and is already $18 billion in debt from hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Many think there is a need for the government to provide flood insurance of this kind. After all, the market would never provide insurance in flood prone areas at an affordable price. But shouldn't that tell us something?

Shouldn't that tell us that it is a losing proposition to insure homes in coastal areas and flood plains often threatened by severe and destructive weather patterns? And if it's a losing proposition, should taxpayers subsidize the inevitable losses arising from federal flood insurance?

The NFIP disguises the real cost of flood insurance in flood prone areas, which influences homebuilding and sales in such areas. Recklessly taking unwise risks when risk is underpriced is known as moral hazard. When politicians decide that private insurance premiums are too high, as with houses built in flood plains, the solution is to under price the risk through federal subsidies. The obvious and expected outcome is more danger to life and limb when disaster strikes.

Even NFIP has been forced to raise rates significantly in coastal areas, and is now dropping second homes from coverage altogether,

Many assume it is compassionate to entrust government central planners with disaster recovery. However, the greatest compassion brings results, not just good intentions. And we've seen how bureaucratic organizations like FEMA mismanaged recovery and relief in the wake of hurricanes Katrina and Ike. Organizations such as the Red Cross and private companies like Home Depot and Duracell have already stepped in admirably to help those in need, and we can only hope FEMA has learned this time not to impede and frustrate private efforts as they have in the past.

Above all, my thoughts and prayers are with the victims of Hurricane Sandy in this tremendously difficult time and hope they can get their lives put back together as quickly and seamlessly as possible.

 

 

Data and Statistics for these countries : Jersey | All
Gold and Silver Prices for these countries : Jersey | All
<< Previous article
Rate : Average :4.5 (18 votes)
>> Next article
Congressman Ron Paul of Texas enjoys a national reputation as the premier advocate for liberty in politics today. Dr. Paul is the leading spokesman in Washington for limited constitutional government, low taxes, free markets, and a return to sound monetary policies based on commodity-backed currency. He is known among both his colleagues in Congress and his constituents for his consistent voting record in the House of Representatives: Dr. Paul never votes for legislation unless the proposed measure is expressly authorized by the Constitution. In the words of former Treasury Secretary William Simon, Dr. Paul is the "one exception to the Gang of 535" on Capitol Hill.
WebsiteMake a donation
Latest comment posted for this article
Be the first to comment
Add your comment
Top articles
Latest Comments
The ideal percentage allocation ...
30 Augssilver
The key should be to recognize that there are 200 million oz of gold and 1.5 billion oz of silver traded per day in London - it is an artifici...
Hidden $Trillion QE Monthly Volume
11:57sneezy67
Another good one by Dr. Jim Willie......Now the ass that all of a sudden down thumbed my previous comments can do likewise with this one...
ZIRP Leading to Economic Collaps...
30 Augssilver
Premia for retail silver bullion accelerating in N. America: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-08-29/despite-being-pet-rock-pre...
Einstein, Physics, Gold and The ...
29 Augsonora69
Real value in gold! What will eventually happen to the precious metals market may perhaps be seen in this weeks movements in the oil market. I ...
‘Saturation’ Now Economic Realit...
29 Augsonora69
Chinese Made Buicks in America? This is a great article which once again ties China's economic collapse to its likely effect on the US economy...
Why We Can't Handle An Equities ...
27 Augsneezy67-1
And thank you for Dollar Collapse.com.... a well diversified economic web site.
Stocks Tank In Last 15 Minutes; ...
26 Augsneezy67-1
Dear Sir: A very short article which sums things up very nicely. Thank You....The check is in the mail.
The ideal percentage allocation ...
25 Augovertheedge3
Of course this depends on the future to mirror the recent past. This is the problem with technical analysis. You are betting the future on ...
Most commented articlesFavoritesMore...
World PM Newsflow
ALL
GOLD
SILVER
PGM & DIAMONDS
OIL & GAS
OTHER METALS
Comments closed
  All Favorites Best Rated  
All clues indicate Sandy is an unnatural disaster caused by weather modification and HAARP steering! Congress surely controls the usage of these two unnatural weather devices. "ALL Law making Power is vested" in the Congress of this United States, (Constitution). Could the "Executive Branch be exceeding it's Constitutional Powers of only "Executing the Laws passed by the Congress" ??? A Concerned Citizen of this Nation!!
Rate :   1  2Rating :   -1
EmailPermalink