Close X Cookies are necessary for the proper functioning of By continuing your navigation on our website, you are accepting the use of cookies.
To learn more about cookies ...
Gold & Silver Prices in

The Fed is Beginning to Splinter… What Comes Next?

IMG Auteur
Published : January 31st, 2013
782 words - Reading time : 1 - 3 minutes
( 1 vote, 5/5 )
Print article
  Article Comments Comment this article Rating All Articles  
Our Newsletter...
Category : Editorials





The Fed is growing increasingly splintered as an organization.

The media hasn’t really picked up on this issue yet. But once they do things could become quite problematic for the Fed.

Remember, the primary force that has held the financial system together since the Crash of 2008 was the view that the Fed could backstop everything.

However, dissent is now growing at the Fed… which means it will be harder for it to move forward in a unified fashion.

Consider its recent FOMC minutes released on January 3 2013.

With regard to the possible costs and risks of purchases, a number of participants expressed the concern that additional purchases could complicate the Committee's efforts to eventually withdraw monetary policy accommodation, for example, by potentially causing inflation expectations to rise or by impairing the future implementation of monetary policy. Participants also discussed the implications of continued asset purchases for the size of the Federal Reserve's balance sheet. Depending on the path for the balance sheet and interest rates, the Federal Reserve's net income and its remittances to the Treasury could be significantly affected during the period of policy normalization. Participants noted that the Committee would need to continue to assess whether large purchases were having adverse effects on market functioning and financial stability. They expressed a range of views on the appropriate pace of purchases, both now and as the outlook evolved. It was agreed that both the efficacy and the costs would need to be carefully monitored and taken into account in determining the size, pace, and composition of asset purchases.

            Source: Fed FOMC minutes

Remember, the Fed only just announced QE 3 in September 2012 and QE 4 in December 2012. At the time of these announcements, the media heralded these moves as indicating that the Fed would act aggressively forever.

And yet, today we find that the Fed was actually conflicted about announcing QE 4 and was questioning the benefits of QE the very day that QE 4 was announced. As we noted in last issue The Great Global Rig of 2012 is Ending, the schemes and policies implemented to hold the system together (including QE) are beginning to lose their effect on the system.

On that note, let us turn our attention to the Fed’s actual activity.

Since September 2011, the US Federal Reserve has announced Operation Twist (extending this beyond its original deadline) as well as QE 3 and QE 4. And yet, in spite of these numerous programs, until January 10 2013 the Fed’s balance sheet was actually smaller than it was the year before (the blue line below).

Throughout this period, the S&P 500 (the red line below) began to disconnect from the Fed’s actual activity. Note how the market continued to rally even when the Fed’s balance sheet was contracting throughout most of 2012.

Why is this?

Because, starting in late 2011 and continuing to the present, the Fed has discovered that verbal intervention has the same impact as actual monetary intervention. Why actually spend the money when you can simply state on TV that you will act if needed and the markets react the same way as if you had announced a new program?

Between the end of QE 2 in June 2011 and the start of QE 3 in September 2012, the Fed resorted time and again to implying it stood ready to act at any time. Despite over eight FOMC meetings in which the Fed didn’t announce QE the markets continued to general push higher on hype and hope of more QE.

Between this, the Fed’s most recent FOMC minutes in which multiple Fed members expressed concern about the efficacy of QE, and the fact that the Fed balance sheet only just eclipsed its previous year levels on January 10 2013 (despite QE 3 and 4 being announced in the second half of 2012), we can draw some very strong conclusions:

1) The Fed is growing splintered on how to proceed from a policy standpoint.

2) This splintering will have political implications (Bernanke will likely step down at the end of his term in early 2014, if not before)

3) This splintering will have major financial implications for every asset class particularly stocks which have become completely disconnected from economic realities.

We offer several FREE Special Reports to help investors navigate this risk and others in the financial system. They include:

Preparing Your Portfolio For Obama’s Economic Nightmare

How to Protect Yourself From Inflation

And last but not least…

Bullion 101: Everything You Need to Know About Investing in Gold and Silver Bullion…

You can pick up free copies of all of the above at:


Graham Summers

Phoenix Capital Research



<< Previous article
Rate : Average note :5 (1 vote)
>> Next article
Graham Summers is Chief Market Strategist for Phoenix Capital Investment Research, an independent financial research firm based in Charlottesville VA with clients in 56 countries around the world.
WebsiteSubscribe to his services
Comments closed
Latest comment posted for this article
Be the first to comment
Add your comment
Top articles
Latest Comments
Silver Bull Market in Force
22 OctS W.
Interesting tech analysis here. Good stuff as I have never looked at 'full bars' closing above or below a 20 bar MA. Only ever the close p...
The Fascist Threat
22 Octsam_site
Your idea that extreme right and left fascism meet is brought out in the Spanish Civil War. The globalists created right wing fascism in Germ...
Trump’s Best Debate Performance ...
21 OctThe Recusant0
Yes, this WAS his best debate performance! But for all the reasons you mentioned, he failed to deliver. And that's why he will be defeated next mon...
Trump VS. Clinton-Who’s “Better”...
21 OctDoom1
Uh...I'm not sure I understand the conclusion here.
Trump’s Best Debate Performance ...
20 OctS W.1
I have only watched the 3rd debate. I am not American. Clinton is a far more polished debater and was far better prepared than Trump. I agr...
Fifteen Years Into the Afghan Wa...
19 Octsam_site
Follow the money folks. Heroin production jumped 13X when the CIA globalists took over Afghan production. You'll never get the sheeple to see the...
My Most Passionate Warning Yet
17 Octstackerguy551
Thank you Mr. Hoffman. I am concerned by the tone of your article, it is pretty scary to say WWIII is probable, and, so it may be, considering some...
Fifteen Years Into the Afghan Wa...
17 OctRichard B.1
Mykey99, the heroin was the main reason we " liberated" Afganastan. The Taliban were burning down the poppy fields and denying our criminal governm...
Most commented articlesFavoritesMore...
World PM Newsflow