Close X Cookies are necessary for the proper functioning of 24hGold.com. By continuing your navigation on our website, you are accepting the use of cookies.
To learn more about cookies ...
EnglishFrench
In the same category

The idiotic notion that QE is not inflationary

IMG Auteur
Published : December 31st, 2012
917 words - Reading time : 2 - 3 minutes
( 4 votes, 4/5 ) , 5 commentaries
Print article
  Article Comments Comment this article Rating All Articles  
0
Send
5
comment
Our Newsletter...
Category : Editorials

 

 

 

 

When someone says that QE (Quantitative Easing) is not inflationary they are probably claiming that it doesn't bring about an increase in the general price level. However, they could also be claiming that it only adds to bank reserves and therefore doesn't cause the economy-wide supply of money to increase. Both claims are completely wrong.

We dealt with the claim that QE doesn't add to the money supply in our 17th December commentary, when we wrote: "...every $1 of bond monetisation by the Fed adds $1 to bank reserves held at the Fed and $1 to "demand deposits" held at commercial banks. Bank reserves aren't counted in the money supply, so there is a net addition of $1 to the money supply for every $1 of bonds purchased by the Fed via a "QE" program. The correct way to view the situation is that the Fed is adding 'covered money' to the economy, in that every new dollar is covered by reserves at the Fed."

A more detailed description of how QE boosts the money supply is found in Mike Pollaro's November-2010 article posted
HERE. This article was written in response to Bernanke's blatant lie that "QE2" wouldn't increase the money supply, but the description of the money creation process applies to all of the Fed's QE programs. The only change in the process from one QE program to the next is the type of asset being monetised. Sometimes the Fed monetises Treasury Securities and at other times it monetises Mortgage Backed Securities. It is conceivable that in the future the Fed will even monetise shares or houses or gold.

You should read the entire Pollaro article, but here's an excerpt that covers the mechanics of money-supply growth via QE:

"The Federal Reserve will be purchasing $600 billion in Treasury securities through the second quarter of 2011, about $75 billion per month from 18 licensed security dealers and most likely from some foreign official institutions too. It will pay for these Treasury securities by writing checks on itself, totaling $600 billion in aggregate, $75 billion per month. Those checks are money orders, to pay cash to these security dealer(s) and/or foreign official institution(s) in return for their Treasury securities. So, upon the sale of their Treasury securities to the Federal Reserve, those security dealer(s) and/or foreign official institution(s) will deposit their checks in their respective bank accounts, and in so doing get cash in the form of deposit money. And the banks, when they turn those checks over to the Federal Reserve for payment, will get reserves in the form of deposits at the Federal Reserve. In sum, those checks, which spring directly from the Federal Reserve’s QE program, become both deposit money and reserves, dollar for dollar, with each and every asset purchase. Bernanke then has given the good students at Jacksonville University only half the story. The Federal Reserve’s QE II purchase program will not only be spiking reserves by $600 billion, but it will also be spiking the money supply by exactly the same amount."

The other fallacious claim is that QE doesn't increase the general price level. You only need a rudimentary understanding of economics to know why this claim is wrong. First, we know for a fact that QE increases the economy-wide supply of money. Second, one of the most basic of economics concepts revolves around the relationship between supply, demand and price. The current market price is, by definition, the price at which supply and demand are in balance, and it is axiomatic that the greater the supply of something the lower the thing's price will be for a given demand. It would certainly be possible for a simultaneous increase in demand to prevent an increase in the supply of a good or service from causing a reduction in its price, but in this case the increase in supply still results in the price being lower than it would have been.

The supply-demand-price relationship applies to money just like it applies to everything else that is traded. If the supply of money increases then the price (purchasing power) of money will end up being lower than it would otherwise have been. The only difference with money is that there isn't a single number that represents price. Attempts are regularly made to calculate such a number, but even if the calculations were carried out rigorously and with the best of intentions the result would be bogus.

The reality is that while an increase in the money supply MUST lower the purchasing power of money, it will do so in a non-uniform way and with unpredictable time lags. This creates a measurement problem, in that we can't show a simplistic correlation between a money-supply increase and an increase in a number that accurately represents the general price level. Such a number just doesn't exist in the real world, although most people who regularly buy everyday items will probably be able to roughly estimate the pace at which their money is losing purchasing power.

In conclusion, anyone who claims that QE does not increase the economy-wide supply of money may as well hold up a sign that reads "I'm clueless about how QE works and how money is created". And anyone who claims that increasing the money supply does not reduce the price (purchasing power) of money may as well hold up a sign that reads "I don't understand basic economics".

In every meaning of the word "inflationary", the Fed's QE programs are inflationary.


 

 



<< Previous article
Rate : Average note :4 (4 votes)
>> Next article
Latest comment posted for this article
Be the first to comment
Add your comment
Top articles
Latest Comments
First Report since April, 2014
05 FebAndy_K1
Jason, One of your articles written way back is one of the reasons I started paying attention to silver and shortly thereafter started to ...
Something has Changed in Gold St...
06 Febneville
No nothing strange has happened in GOLD stocks....absolutely nothing.....The fact of the matter is that you byrne have been playing the man and...
The Revisionist Theory and Histo...
05 Febovertheedge
"The key is in the hand of the U.S. government. It is the same key that was used to lockthe U.S. Mint to silver in 1873, and to gold sixty years la...
First Report since April, 2014
05 FebS W.1
Here I was just 2 days ago thinking whatever happened to that evangelical silver guy. Low and behold up he springs, like some spirit from the g...
LBMA Silver “Price”: A Perfect S...
03 FebS W.
There is no doubt that the Comex can be used as a casino for those who want to trade Silver up/or down or maybe some just wish to take a small punt...
LBMA Silver “Price”: A Perfect S...
30 JanOzSILV1
Bron refuses to EVER admit this market is a Casino and the disconnect between Paper and Physical is a big clue to this
LBMA Silver “Price”: A Perfect S...
30 JanS W.
Usually I enjoy Bron's take on things,but to be perfectly honest, I can't understand 95% of what he his on about here. I get the feeling that h...
ANOTHER NAIL IN THE U.S. EMPIRE ...
30 JanDemosthenes0
Very naive and pretentious article! The author thinks he knows everything and yet knows next to nothing. Shale gas producers are neither stupid n...
Most commented articlesFavoritesMore...
World PM Newsflow
ALL
GOLD
SILVER
PGM & DIAMONDS
OIL & GAS
OTHER METALS
Mining Company News
Lara Expl.(Cu-Zn-Au)LRA.V
Revised Resource Estimate Report Filed for Maravaia Copper Gold Deposit
CA$ 0.34+1.47%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Black HillsBKH
Black Hills reports 4Q loss
US$ 50.90-0.59%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Kinder Morgan(Oil)KMP
Midstream Companies Were above the 20-Day Moving Averages
US$ 102.03+1.98%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Kinder Morgan(Oil)KMP
Midstream Companies Were above the 20-Day Moving Averages
US$ 102.03+1.98%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Devon Energy(Ngas-Oil)DVN
Gasoline Inventories Rose Last Week despite Fall in Production
US$ 22.66-4.31%Trend Power :
Corporate news
United States Steel(Fe-Sn)X
U.S. Steel (X) States Ratification of Labor Agreements
US$ 7.34-5.53%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Black HillsBKH
4:34 pm Black Hills Corp beats by $0.04, misses on revs; guides FY16 EPS below consensus
US$ 50.90-0.59%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Black HillsBKH
Black Hills Corp. Reports 2015 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Results
US$ 50.90-0.59%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Transcanada PipelinesTRP.TO
TransCanada to Sign Substantial Agreement to Benefit Québec Economy
CA$ 48.65+0.16%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Devon Energy(Ngas-Oil)DVN
4Q15 Crude Oil Prices: Fallout for the Energy Sector and SPY
US$ 22.66-4.31%Trend Power :
Corporate news
Comments closed
  All Favorites Best Rated  
Less money in the hands of the people, so the notion that QE is inflationary is idiotic.
Rate :   2  3Rating :   -1
EmailPermalink
Oh, you graduated from the University of Western Australia in 1984 with a degree in electronic engineering, now I understand.
Rate :   0  6Rating :   -6
EmailPermalink
What is money these days supposed to look like ?
Rate :   2  0Rating :   2
EmailPermalink
You're indeed clueless about purchasing power.
Rate :   0  5Rating :   -5
EmailPermalink
It's obvious, that QE doesn't increase the money in the hands of the people.
That's why it's not inflationary
Rate :   0  5Rating :   -5
EmailPermalink