Chart usGOLD   Chart usSILVER  
 
Food for thought
Historians are pessimistic by nature because te only future they can imagine is the past
Robert Skidelsky  
Search for :
LATEST NEWS  :
MINING STOCKS  :
Subscribe
Write Us
Add to Google
Search on Ebay :
PRECIOUS METALS (US $)
Gold 1213.05-0.55
Silver 17.170.02
Platinum 1277.00-2.25
Palladium 775.75-0.75
WORLD MARKETS
DOWJONES 16805-236
NASDAQ 4422-71
NIKKEI 16082-91
ASX 533538
CAC 40 4365-51
DAX 9382-92
HUI 1961
XAU 810
CURRENCIES (€)
AUS $ 1.4445
CAN $ 1.4085
US $ 1.2616
GBP (£) 0.7794
Sw Fr 1.2068
YEN 137.6100
CURRENCIES ($)
AUS $ 1.1450
CAN $ 1.1163
Euro 0.7927
GBP (£) 0.6179
Sw Fr 0.9566
YEN 109.0760
RATIOS & INDEXES
Gold / Silver70.65
Gold / Oil13.60
Dowjones / Gold13.85
COMMODITIES
Copper 3.04-0.02
WTI Oil 89.18-0.58
Nat. Gas 4.02-0.10
Market Indices
Metal Prices
RSS
Precious Metals
Graph Generator
Statistics by Country
Statistics by Metals
Advertise on 24hGold
Projects on Google Earth
In the same category
The value of the dollar
Published : December 10th, 2012
529 words - Reading time : 1 - 2 minutes
( 7 votes, 4.4/5 ) Print article
 
    Comments    
Tweet

 

 

 

 

I very rarely criticise the work of others, but I am going to make an exception in the case of Paul van Eeden, of Cranberry Capital. Mr van Eeden, in an interview with The Gold Report stated that “the value of gold is about $900 per oz. Expectations of monetary inflation are keeping gold prices high.” He states that quantitative easing is not producing the inflation expected. The purpose of this article is to point out some of the fallacies behind his approach, and in this respect, Mr van Eeden is far from alone. And this is where a number of basic errors are committed.

We start with the definition of value. According to the glossary of von Mises’ Human Action, value is “always relative, subjective and human, never absolute, objective or divine”. It is reflected in human conduct, placing value in the same subjective category as fairness and morality. So all Mr van Eeden is basically doing is expressing a personal subjective opinion when he talks about the value of gold. He justifies his belief with a monetary statistic of his own invention, and compares its growth rate with the rate of increase in the price of gold. The basic error Mr van Eeden makes here is to believe there is a physical link between changes in the supply of money and the gold price. For a start, there is no convertibility between the two, and fiat dollars are intrinsically worthless, so cannot realistically form the basis of a valid monetary equation.

The dollar only has value because the foreign exchange markets and the people that use it assume it has value, vaguely based on the standing of the issuer. This can change suddenly and substantially, irrespective of changes of the quantity in circulation: ask anyone who possessed Icelandic kroner a few years ago. Likewise, gold has a value that measured in paper money can change suddenly, without a sudden jump in mine supply, if people simply shift their preferences between gold and money.

If Mr van Eeden’s view of value was fundamentally justified, one would expect foreigners, particularly central banks and over three billion Asians, to cash in their gold for dollars. Instead they are keen gold buyers, and we get no explanation why, other than the implication that they are all wrong and Mr van Eeden is right. Asians are not interested in his views, or mine for that matter: they know that gold is a better store of wealth in the long term than any invention of government or the financial markets; and they know this through experience.

I would also question his statistics. He constructs something he calls actual money supply, which is merely the sum of cash and deposits. Inexplicably, he excludes checking accounts.

All you need to know is that Austrian, or true money supply in dollars, for which there is a sound theoretical basis, is 23 times the value of gold said to be held by the US Treasury. Based on this relationship, my admittedly subjective view is that at a time of escalating global systemic risk, the dollar is wildly over-valued relative to gold, and not the other way round.

 

 

Thanks to Alasdair Macleod from www.goldmoney.com
Tweet
Rate :Average note :4.4 (7 votes)View Top rated
Previous article by
Alasdair Macleod
All articles by
Alasdair Macleod
Next article by
Alasdair Macleod
Receive by mail the latest articles by this author  
Latest comment posted for this article
Be the first to comment
Add your comment
TOP ARTICLES
MOST READ
TOP RATED
MOST COMMENTED
Editor's picks
RSS feed24hGold Mobile
Gold Data CenterGold & Silver Converter
Gold coins on eBaySilver coins on eBay
Technical AnalysisFundamental Analysis

Alasdair Macleod

FinanceAndEconomics.org is the website of Alasdair Macleod, who has a background as a stockbroker, banker and economist. Alasdair is available for seminars, speeches and interviews. Please check on Services to get further detalils.
Alasdair Macleod ArchiveWebsiteSubscribe to his services
Most recent articles by Alasdair Macleod
9/30/2014
9/27/2014
9/26/2014
9/21/2014
9/20/2014
All Articles
Comment this article
You must be logged in to comment an article8000 characters max.
 
Sign in
User : Password : Login
Sign In Forgot password?
 
Receive 24hGold's Daily Market Briefing in your inbox. Go here to subscribe or unsubscribe.
Disclaimer