Where’s the panicked rush to “delete” accounts?
Things at Facebook came to a head, following the disclosure that personal
data from 50 million of its users had been given to a sordid outfit in the
UK, Cambridge Analytica, whose business model is to manipulate elections by
hook or crook around the world, and which is now getting vivisected by UK and
US authorities.
The infamous “person familiar with the matter” told Bloomberg that the Federal Trade Commission has opened an
investigation into whether Facebook violated a consent decree dating back to
2011, when Facebook settled similar allegations – giving user data to third
parties without user’s knowledge or consent. Bloomberg:
Under the 2011 settlement, Facebook agreed to get user consent for certain
changes to privacy settings as part of a settlement of federal charges that
it deceived consumers and forced them to share more personal information than
they intended. That complaint arose after the company changed some user
settings without notifying its customers, according to an FTC statement at
the time.
If Facebook is found to be in violation of the consent decree, the FTC can
extract a fine of $40,000 per day, per violation. Given the 50 million
victims spread over so many days, this could be some real money, so to speak.
Facebook said in a statement, cited by Bloomberg, that it rejected “any
suggestion of violation of the consent decree.” It also said with tone-deaf
Facebook hilarity, “Privacy and data protections are fundamental to every
decision we make.”
That Facebook is collecting every little bit of personal data it can from
its users and their contacts and how they react to certain things, their
preferences, their choices, physical appearance – photos, I mean come on
– clues about their personalities, and the like has been known from day
one. That’s part of its business model. It’s not a secret.
That third parties have access to this data has also been known at least
since 2011. Advertisers also have had access to certain types of data to
target their ads.
And yet, Facebook’s user base has grown. More than ever, people put their
entire lives on Facebook – maybe not the kids, as they’ve become enamored
with other platforms, but their moms. Babies are on Facebook long before they
have any idea what Facebook is. There’s a generation growing up that has been
on Facebook since birth.
When the Equifax hack occurred last year – which Equifax disclosed graciously and partially months after the fact
on September 7 – the personal data of what has now grown to 145.5 million
consumers was stolen. This included names, birth dates, Social Security
numbers, addresses, and “in some instances,” driver’s license numbers, and
other data.
This shocked the world that pays attention to this because the data breach
could unleash a tsunami of identity theft. But most consumers who saw it in
the media simply shrugged and went on. They could have put a credit freeze on
their accounts with the credit bureaus, thus making it nearly impossible for
someone else to get a loan or credit card in their name (identity theft). But
few consumers put a credit freeze on their accounts. Many consumers still
don’t know what Equifax is or what it does, and when you discuss the
situation, they think you’re spouting off conspiracy theories.
But there is a difference between credit bureaus such as Equifax and
social media platforms such as Facebook.
With credit bureaus, consumers have no choice. They’re forced to be part
of the credit-bureau data bases. Their data is collected, and there is
nothing they can do about it. Consumer protection should be the number one
priority. When companies get hacked and this consumer data gets stolen, there
should be harsh punishments against these companies if they’re found to have
been negligent. Arthur Andersen comes to mind.
But with Facebook and other social media platforms, there is no coercion.
Consumers submit their most private data voluntarily – nay, eagerly. They
jump through hoops to share this stuff with the rest of the world. So maybe
they only want to share it with x and not with y, but heck, they’re uploading
it to the Internet. What do they expect?
And there is another difference between Equifax and Facebook: Equifax was
hacked and the data was stolen. Facebook gave away the data
as part of its business model.
But they do have a major trait in common: An aggrieved consumer cannot
delete the data these outfits have collected on that consumer. While Facebook
allows you to “delete” items and “delete” your account, the data stays behind
on the server. It’s available for all purposes; it’s just not publicly viewable.
So now there’s a hue and cry in the media about Facebook, put together by
reporters who are still active on Facebook and who have no intention of
quitting Facebook. There has been no panicked rush to “delete” accounts.
There has been no massive movement to quit Facebook forever. Facebook does
what it does because it does it, and because it’s so powerful that it can do
it. A whole ecosystem around it depends on the consumer data it collects.
Yes, there will be the usual ceremonies that Equifax also went through:
CEO Zuckerberg may get to address the Judiciary Committee in Congress. The
questions thrown at him for public consumption will be pointed. But behind
the scenes, away from the cameras, there will be the usual backslapping
between lawmakers and corporations. Publicly, there will be some
wrist-slapping and some lawsuits, and all this will be settled and squared
away in due time. Life will go on. Facebook will continue to collect the data
because consumers continue to surrender their data to Facebook voluntarily.
And third parties will continue to have access to this data.
With Facebook, consumers are in total control: They can just refuse to
open an account. And if they have already opened an account, they can delete
the app on their mobile devices, clean the cache on their computers, and
swear to not ever again sign back in. If enough consumers do that, the whole
construct would come down.
The only act that would change anything is if consumers massively and
forever abandon Facebook and platforms like it, and never-ever sign on again.
That would bulldoze the whole problem away. But that’s not going to happen
because consumers don’t want it to happen.
So as far as I’m concerned, people who are still active on Facebook cannot
be helped. They should just enjoy the benefits of having their lives exposed
to the world and serving as a worthy tool and resource for corporate
interests, political shenanigans, election manipulators, jealous exes, and
other facts of life.
Meanwhile, these dang trillions are flying by so fast, they’re hard to
see. Read… US
Gross National Debt Spikes $1.2 Trillion in 6 Months, Hits $21 Trillion
Would you like to be notified via email when WOLF STREET
publishes a new article? Sign up here.
