|
Oil prices are starting to creep back up while gas,
coal and uranium are poised for moves this fall, according to Mark Lackey,
long-time energy analyst now representing resource companies with CHF
Investor Relations. In this exclusive interview with The Energy Report,
Lackey shares his current insights on energy markets and talks about a number
of companies he thinks are sleepers, ready to move quickly when the energy
commodities take off.
The Energy
Report: Since your
last interview, you've made a jump from the research side of the business to
the investor relations (IR) side. How has the view changed?
Mark
Lackey: When I
worked in the brokerage industry, I relied on IR people to bring me clients
and stories, updates on companies I was following or promising companies of
which I was never aware. There are over 3,000 companies listed on the TSX and
TSX Venture exchanges and you can't know all the stories, so analysts often
need introductions. Here at CHF, I'm involved in taking clients, largely in
the resource sector, to meet with research and corporate finance people and
brokers as well as retail and institutional investors. We also help with
companies' press releases, presentations and even market-making.
But
regardless of whether I'm doing research or IR, it's still a function of
whether you believe in commodity cycles and how certain sectors, companies,
locations and managements will benefit and profit.
TER: Talking to other brokerage firms and people in the
investment business, what's the general mood at this point?
ML: In the small- and mid-cap market, the mood has been
mixed. Some people are negative about the commodities sector in the short
run, and some even think the whole commodity cycle is over. Others are more
neutral. Then you have a smaller group of people who tend to support my view
and are much more positive in the very short run.
TER: How does this affect your view of the oil and gas
markets?
ML: I'm actually quite positive. After getting down
below $80/barrel (bbl), West Texas Intermediate
(WTI) is now back up over $96/bbl. The Brent price
is at $115/bbl. Recent inventory numbers, particularly in the U.S., are down,
so there's no overhang in the near term. Demand has hung in reasonably well,
considering all the European problems, and there's still decent demand coming
from the emerging markets. WTI will likely trade between $100/bbl and $105/bbl next year,
with Brent between $115/bbl and $120/bbl.
Natural
gas has been somewhat weaker, but it bounced off the $2/thousand cubic feet (Mcf) price a few months ago up to the $2.85–3/Mcf range in North America. With more industrial demand
coming back, particularly in the auto sector, and stronger demand from
electric utilities, gas should move back up closer to $3.25–3.30/Mcf in the next year. By way of comparison, prices in
Europe can be anywhere from $4–8/Mcf, and in
China they're as high as $15/Mcf.
TER: What interesting oil and gas situations have you
recently come across that deserve some investor attention?
ML: The first company I'd like to talk about is Greenfields Petroleum Corp.
(GNF:TSX.V), which
has production in Azerbaijan, a country that used to produce about 70% of the
old Soviet Union's oil and gas. Azerbaijan probably has the best history and
the best understanding of oil and natural gas relative to most of the other
countries in that area. Another advantage there is getting the Brent price
for oil.
Azerbaijan
still has some pretty good land positions available that would be more
difficult to get in North America these days. Greenfields has gone back into
some of the previously developed areas and is doing more delineation work,
rather than wildcat exploration. It also has some greenfields
projects. It's going to get some pretty good returns given the prices over
there for both natural gas and oil. I think you'll see growing production
from this company over the next few years in an area where there's potential
to see some real improvement in cash flow. The stock has had pretty nice
moves off its lows. With higher expected oil prices in the next year, we
would anticipate that the share price should move higher.
TER: Is Azerbaijan stable?
ML: Yes. Azerbaijan has had an oil and gas industry for
over 50 years and recognizes that this is its biggest source of income. It
understands the oil and gas industry and this is a relatively good place to
do business compared to all the potential places that you could look for oil
in the world.
TER: Who else is on your radar?
ML: We like Primeline Energy Holdings Inc. (PEH:TSX.V) and its prospects in the South China Sea. Its partner is the China
National Offshore Oil Co. (CNOOC), which is a huge company. Primeline just put out an updated resource report and
should be producing by the middle of next year. With the extremely high natural
gas prices in China, the company should have good cash flows and earnings
within the next year or two, as well as some pretty good capital appreciation
potential.
The stock
started to gain momentum after the company filed its Overall Development Plan
for the Lishui gas project in June and it's now
pushing its 52-week high of $0.60. We think it offers investors a really
attractive opportunity over the next few years.
TER: Oil services have been getting some positive press
lately. Are you following any companies in that sector?
ML: The oil services side is often overlooked by
investors. But drilling activity and rising prices create rising demand for
oil services. We represent Bri-Chem Corp. (BRY:TSX), which is a North American wholesale distributor of
oil and gas drilling fluids and piping products to the energy business. Bri-Chem is well integrated in the oil and gas service
industry and expanded from Canada to the U.S. last year. It has earnings and
cash flow and it is one that investors should be looking at.
Up until a
couple of years ago, U.S. production had been on the decline for 40 years.
But in the last few years, production has increased with improved technology
accessing unconventional hydrocarbons, particularly in the shale formations.
This has been a boon for many of the oil service companies like Bri-Chem, which is likely to grow its cash flow and
earnings even more over the next few years. It's trading around $2.65 and provides
a pretty good opportunity for capital appreciation at these levels.
TER: Let's talk about the uranium market. Prices have
been fairly flat and they've shown a little weakness in the past month. What
do you think is happening there?
ML: Uranium was $70/pound (lb)
back in March 2011 and then drifted down after the Fukushima incident. Japan
took steps to close all 56 of its reactors and the Germans have taken out
about seven or eight. There are about 445 operating worldwide.
The price
has been sitting around the $50–$51/lb range
for a number of months and recently has gone down to $49/lb
on the short-term market. The lower demand in the short run is the reason for
the $20 hit. The Japanese have probably gone through three-quarters of their
reactors, testing them to make sure they can withstand certain high-strength
earthquakes. They are also putting up larger retaining walls and doing other
things to prevent future problems from flooding. Our guess is that at least
half of those reactors will be back in operation in the next six months and
maybe as many as 75–80% of them within the next year, period. Nuclear
power accounts for 15% of Japan's needs. Japan's economy really can't
function without some nuclear power in order to meet demand; its manufacturing
sector requires an ongoing, inexpensive, stable power supply.
There are
60 other reactors around the world under construction and about another 240
planned over the next 5–10 years. Another factor is that next year, the
phaseout of the Russian exports to the U.S. of
highly enriched uranium from its nuclear warheads will end. Thus, demand is
coming back and some supply is constrained, which should cause prices to move
up in the next couple of years.
TER: What stocks do you like in the uranium industry at
this point?
ML: We have followed Strathmore Minerals Corp. (STM:TSX; STHJF:OTCQX) for a while. It has large positions in both New
Mexico and Wyoming, which has produced 90% of past U.S. uranium production.
In 1980, the U.S. was the biggest producer of uranium in the world. Today it
only produces about 4 million pounds (Mlb) a year,
making up about 8% of its needs. Strathmore is sitting on large reserves and
has the potential to be a significant producer down the road. It expects to
be producing in 2016 out of Wyoming and in 2017 out of New Mexico. The stock
price has probably been hurt by the weaker uranium price and the fact that it
is three years from production. We expect uranium prices to rise to $65/lb by the end of next year and to $75/lb
by the end of 2014. This could be a perfect storm for Strathmore, and the
market will start to recognize this stock. I think you'll see quite a bit of
capital appreciation over the next two to four years.
TER: What else are you looking at in the uranium sector?
ML: We like Fission Energy Corp. (FIS:TSX.V; FSSIF:OTCQX). It recently took over another uranium company,
Pitchstone, which had some very good properties, also in the Athabasca Basin
of Saskatchewan. What makes Fission very attractive is its proximity to Hathor, which was taken over by Rio Tinto Plc
(RIO:NYSE; RIO:ASX; RIO:LSE; RTPPF:OTCPK) last year in a battle with Cameco Corp. (CCO:TSX; CCJ:NYSE), the world's largest uranium company. It's obvious
that Rio Tinto wants to get bigger in North America and Cameco
would also be interested in making acquisitions.
One of the
potential takeover candidates would have to be Fission. It does need to do
more drilling and prove up its resource over time. But, it's well positioned,
has the money and is certainly in the right address near some of the biggest
and highest-grade uranium mines in the world. It has good management and the
company is well funded. We think this is a stock that people should also be
looking to invest in. As this company moves forward and proves up more
reserves, it will become a much more likely takeover candidate, perhaps in
the next couple of years.
The other
company that I like in this sector is Forum Uranium Corp. (FDC:TSX.V), which is really more of a microcap company, of
which I only follow maybe three or four. My interest in Forum is based on its
very good project location in the Athabasca Basin and its very experienced
management team. Its partner is Rio Tinto, which just took over Hathor and wants to expand in the area. Other than maybe Cameco, you couldn't ask for a better partner. It's done
some drilling and needs to do more to move this stock to a point where
somebody would consider taking it over. For a micro-cap uranium play, Forum
is a good one to look at considering its project and its partner.
TER: The other part of the energy market is thermal and
metallurgical coal used in steel production. What have those two markets been
doing?
ML: We tend to follow more of the met coal market. The
weakness in the natural gas price, particularly in the U.S., has hurt thermal
coal producers, especially in Appalachia, where there are somewhat higher
costs. We think the thermal coal market will see some recovery over the next
couple of years because it's not just the U.S. that uses thermal coal. Far
more thermal coal is used in China than in the U.S.
The
high-cost producers have been affected the most as thermal prices have been
hit as much as 20–30% in the last three to four months. That's made a
difference to the bottom lines and investment analysts' view of that sector.
The same
thing has happened in the met coal market. Because Chinese steel prices,
particularly in China, have gone down 20% in the last three months, iron ore
has gone down 20%, putting downward pressure on the met coal price because
the biggest steel market in the world is China.
On the
Australian market, the price has gone from $225/ton (t) down to $175/t. We
think that this is probably the bottom of the market for steel, iron ore and
met coal because construction activity usually picks up dramatically in China
in October, November and December. We expect that all three areas will see
recovery moving into the fall and through next year.
Weakness
in the met coal market has affected the prices of all the companies we're
going to talk about. I'd rather be buying when the met coal price is $175/t
than when it was $225/t three months ago or when it was $300/t at one point
last year. Now you can buy these companies at much lower prices and probably
get much better value for your money.
TER: Let's talk about some of the companies you like.
ML: The first one I like is Corsa Coal Corp. (CSO:TSX), based in Ontario with production largely in
Pennsylvania and some in Maryland. It's largely metallurgical, and a little
bit thermal. Corsa has very high-quality coal that
can be blended because of its low sulfur and ash levels. It's well-located in
Pennsylvania near the major U.S. steel industry, which is still the
third-largest producer in the world.
If you're
one of the somewhat bigger neighboring producers in Pennsylvania whose
quality of met coal is not as good, I think Corsa could
be a good acquisition target. It expects to have some significant increases
in production in the next two to three years. With the met price getting back
up to the $225/t range over the next year or two, it should have some pretty
good cash flow and potential earnings over that time.
The
stock's trading right now at $0.17/share. I don't follow that many microcaps
but Corsa is certainly one of the few I do and
like.
TER: How about some other ones?
ML: Another one we follow is Cline Mining Corp. (CMK:TSX), a Toronto-based company with a significant met coal operation in
Colorado that was about to start production within the last month. The
decline in the price of met coal caused the company to postpone start-up and
lay off people for 60 days. As a new producer, it could have been difficult
to sell any of its coal. I think management did the wise thing by waiting to
see if the market will come back in the fall and not build up too much inventory
in a weak market.
Of course,
this disappointed the market and it hit the stock price fairly hard. Cline
has very good-quality coal with significant reserves and could be a pretty
significant producer within the next two to three years, selling some in the
U.S. and shipping some through Texas all the way over to China. With the
expansion of the Panama Canal in 2014, bigger ships can go to China and a
company like Cline would probably sell most of its coal abroad in the future.
TER: What other companies do you like?
ML: Colonial Coal International Corp.
(CAD:TSX.V) is a western Canadian met coal company in the Peace
River area in Alberta. It's in a good met coal-producing area with
infrastructure, rail, experienced labor and decent power prices. Colonial is
working on developing two very high-quality met coal properties, suitable for
coking, with large reserves. There have been a number of takeovers in this
area in the last year. And, looking at valuations, this company could
certainly be trading at a much higher level if somebody was targeting them.
If I had to pick someone in the met coal business in western Canada right
now, Colonial would be my most likely acquisition target. Comparing it to the
value of some of the other companies out there, its stock price should be
considerably higher than where it's trading right now, at around $0.76/share.
TER: To wrap things up, give us your general thoughts on
where you think things are headed and how the average man on the street
should be looking at these energy investments.
ML: If you believe we're in a long-term commodities
cycle, as we do here at CHF, then this is probably one of the best points to
enter these markets.
We think
oil is going higher, while some of the natural gas prices in the world are
already extremely high. Coal and uranium markets appear near the bottom and
we expect to see higher prices over the next two to three years.
In short,
we think this is actually one of the better buying opportunities we've seen
in the last decade for small and mid-cap companies in these sectors, and
select micro-caps with sound fundamentals.
TER: Thanks for talking with us today. There are
certainly lots of good opportunities out there.
Mark Lackey, executive vice president of CHF Investor Relations
(Cavalcanti Hume Funfer
Inc.), has 30 years of experience in the energy, mining, banking and
investment research sectors. At CHF, Lackey involves himself with business
development, client positioning, staff team coaching and education, market
analysis and special projects to benefit client companies. He has worked as
chief investment strategist at Pope & Company Ltd. and at the Bank of
Canada, where he was responsible for U.S. economic forecasting. He was a
senior manager of commodities at the Bank of Montreal. He also spent 10 years
in the oil industry with Gulf Canada, Chevron Canada and Petro Canada.
Want to
read more exclusive Energy Report interviews like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you'll learn when
new articles have been published. To see a list of recent interviews with
industry analysts and commentators, visit our Exclusive
Interviews page.
DISCLOSURE:
1) Zig Lambo of The
Energy Report conducted this interview. He personally and/or his family
own shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None.
2) The following companies mentioned in the interview are sponsors of The
Energy Report: Strathmore Minerals Corp. and Fission Energy Corp.
Streetwise Reports does not accept stock in exchange
for services. Interviews are edited for clarity.
3) Mark Lackey: I personally and/or my family own shares of the following
companies mentioned in this interview: Cline Mining Corp., Primeline Energy Holdings Inc. and Strathmore Minerals
Corp. I personally and/or my family am paid by the
following companies mentioned in this interview: None. I was not paid by
Streetwise Reports for participating in this interview.
4) CHF Investor Relations: Greenfields Petroleum Corp., Primeline
Energy Holdings Inc. and Bri-Chem Corp. are clients
of CHF Investor Relations and pay cash fees to CHF. CHF may have stock
options or own stock in these companies.
|