U.S. Employment Data: A Curious Divergence

IMG Auteur
Published : February 13th, 2013
455 words - Reading time : 1 - 1 minutes
( 2 votes, 5/5 )
Print article
  Article Comments Comment this article Rating All Articles  
0
Send
0
comment
Our Newsletter...
Category : Opinions and Analysis

From Panzner Insights:

Each month, the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. detail what is happening in the jobs market. Although the tallies of monthly changes reported by each side are often out of kilter, their respective private nonfarm payroll totals have since the end of 2000 moved largely in tandem.

From December 2000 through December 2011, the median monthly gap between the two was 78,000, or 0.07 percent of the total. The largest reported difference was seen in November 2002, when the BLS total was 394,000, or 0.36 percent, higher than its ADP counterpart.

24hGold - U.S. Employment Data...
But as the chart shows, there has been a big change. From January 2012 through last month, the spread between the two series has widened dramatically as the BLS tally rose at a faster pace than the one reported by ADP. Over the span, the median differential was 614,000 jobs, or 0.55 percent. The minimum differential was 396,000, or 0.36 percent, in January 2012, while the maximum was 809,000, or 0.72 percent, in December 2012.

One possible reason for the disparity is that either the BLS or ADP altered the methodology they relied on in the previous 11 years and that statisticians on the other side have not yet cottoned on. While this is possible, I find it hard to believe that those who crunch the numbers for such an important data series would not be quick to incorporate an updated approach in their own calculations.

[Editor's note: some have pointed out that ADP did, in fact, revise their methodology in late-2012 to bring its figures more closely into line with those of the BLS; and yet, the gap between the two series appears to be as wide as ever. Say what?]

Another explanation is that statisticians at the BLS or ADP suddenly decided to “fudge” their numbers up or down, respectively. One obvious question, of course, is why would a company that stands to benefit from an improving jobs market want to report a more subdued sense of conditions on the ground than is actually the case? The logical answer is that they wouldn’t.

However, one could readily argue that many in Washington had a compelling interest in painting as bright a picture as possible of what was happening in an area of the economy that has remained in focus since the onset of the Great Recession. Why? Because they stood to gain from ensuring that policies that had benefited them personally–namely, continued government spending–remained in force.

One way to do that, of course, is to try and make it easier for those who were then in power to remain in charge after the next election, which just happened to be coming up in late-2012.

Hmmm.

<< Previous article
Rate : Average note :5 (2 votes)
>> Next article
Michael J. Panzner is a 25-year veteran of the global stock, bond, and currency markets and the author of Financial Armageddon: Protecting Your Future from Four Impending Catastrophes, published by Kaplan Publishing.
WebsiteSubscribe to his services
Comments closed
Latest comment posted for this article
Be the first to comment
Add your comment
Top articles
Latest Comments
Racism-O-Rama
07:54dennyc1
Ah, yes, black welfare recipients receiving our hard earned and easily spent tax dollars and providing us nothing save their lives for our investme...
Racism-O-Rama
15 JanDoom1
It's not just the English that is considered RACIST, it's also mathematics, and a wide range of other things: http://professorconfess.blogspot...
The World’s Most – And Least – Miserable Countries in 2016
15 JanWatchdoctor
Happiness is not determined by financial situations, though it does of course negatively impact on our ambitions. Wether or not you are happy, rega...
Number One Concern of US Citizens is Terrorism
14 JanThe Recusant
The chances of dying in a terrorist attack in the US (with 9/11 statistics included) is around 1 in a million per year. Compared to dying from non-...
Mad As Hell
14 JanThe Recusant0
j T.: Yes, the Democrats putting up HRC as their candidate in a populist electoral period was pure stupidity. And both parties allowing Obamacare t...
2018: The Wrong Lesson on Gold Investing
14 JanThe Recusant
As you say, it's only what the central banks do that matters. Gold and its little brother silver are the only true measures of fiat currencies and ...
Trump's Ignorance
13 JanRichard J.1
At this point isnt it pretty obvious it’s got to all blow....as much as Hugo is dead on do we really want the US to survive as caretaker of world m...
One-year score card for Trump
13 JanS W.
Everything else aside, Donald Trump has a very small mouth, combined with the weirdest lip action and pouting of any person I have ever seen.
Most commented articlesFavoritesMore...
World PM Newsflow
ALL
GOLD
SILVER
PGM & DIAMONDS
OIL & GAS
OTHER METALS
Take advantage of rising gold stocks
  • Subscribe to our weekly mining market briefing.
  • Receive our research reports on junior mining companies
    with the strongest potential
  • Free service, your email is safe
  • Limited offer, register now !
Go to website.