Chart usGOLD   Chart usSILVER  
 
Food for thought
Gold is diversification and insurance all wrapped up into one nice package. So simple.
Anonymous  
Search for :
LATEST NEWS  :
MINING STOCKS  :
Subscribe
Write Us
Add to Google
Search on Ebay :
PRECIOUS METALS (US $)
Gold 1174.23-24.37
Silver 16.06-0.42
Platinum 1232.50-5.80
Palladium 778.752.85
WORLD MARKETS
DOWJONES 17195227
NASDAQ 456617
NIKKEI 16414756
ASX 550548
CAC 40 421170
DAX 9252137
HUI 165-13
XAU 68-5
CURRENCIES ($)
AUS $ 1.1354
CAN $ 1.1210
Euro 0.7964
GBP (£) 0.6259
Sw Fr 0.9605
YEN 111.5780
RATIOS & INDEXES
Gold / Silver73.12
Gold / Oil14.69
Dowjones / Gold14.64
COMMODITIES
Copper 3.120.01
WTI Oil 79.94-0.58
Nat. Gas 3.72-0.01
Market Indices
Metal Prices
RSS
Precious Metals
Graph Generator
Statistics by Country
Statistics by Metals
Advertise on 24hGold
Projects on Google Earth
In the same category
Want To Understand Lincoln?
Published : February 24th, 2013
657 words - Reading time : 1 - 2 minutes
( 15 votes, 3.9/5 ) , 4 commentaries Print article
 
    Comments    
Tweet
Keywords :   Europe | Government | Mexico | Southern |

Steven Spielberg's Lincoln has been a box-office hit and nominated for 12 Academy Awards, including best picture, best director and best actor for Daniel Day-Lewis, who portrayed our 16th president. I haven't seen the movie; therefore, this column is not about the movie but about a man deified by many. My colleague Thomas DiLorenzo, economics professor at Loyola University Maryland, exposed some of the Lincoln myth in his 2006 book, Lincoln Unmasked. Now comes Joseph Fallon, cultural intelligence analyst and former U.S. Army Intelligence Center instructor, with his new e-book, Lincoln Uncensored. Fallon's book examines 10 volumes of collected writings and speeches of Lincoln's, which include passages on slavery, secession, equality of blacks and emancipation. We don't have to rely upon anyone's interpretation. Just read his words to see what you make of them.

In an 1858 letter, Lincoln said, "I have declared a thousand times, and now repeat that, in my opinion neither the General Government, nor any other power outside of the slave states, can constitutionally or rightfully interfere with slaves or slavery where it already exists." In a Springfield, Ill., speech, he explained, "My declarations upon this subject of negro slavery may be misrepresented, but can not be misunderstood. I have said that I do not understand the Declaration (of Independence) to mean that all men were created equal in all respects." Debating with Sen. Stephen Douglas, Lincoln said, "I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of ... making voters or jurors of Negroes nor of qualifying them to hold office nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races, which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality."

You say, "His Emancipation Proclamation freed the slaves! That proves he was against slavery." Lincoln's words: "I view the matter (Emancipation Proclamation) as a practical war measure, to be decided upon according to the advantages or disadvantages it may offer to the suppression of the rebellion." He also wrote: "I will also concede that emancipation would help us in Europe, and convince them that we are incited by something more than ambition." At the time Lincoln wrote the proclamation, war was going badly for the Union. London and Paris were considering recognizing the Confederacy and considering assisting it in its war effort.

The Emancipation Proclamation was not a universal declaration. It detailed where slaves were freed, only in those states "in rebellion against the United States." Slaves remained slaves in states not in rebellion – such as Kentucky, Maryland and Delaware. The hypocrisy of the Emancipation Proclamation came in for heavy criticism. Lincoln's own secretary of state, William Seward, said, "We show our sympathy with slavery by emancipating slaves where we cannot reach them and holding them in bondage where we can set them free."

Lincoln did articulate a view of secession that would have been welcomed in 1776: "Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing government and form a new one that suits them better. ... Nor is this right confined to cases in which the whole people of an existing government may choose to exercise it. Any portion of such people that can may revolutionize and make their own of so much of the territory as they inhabit." But that was Lincoln's 1848 speech in the U.S. House of Representatives regarding the war with Mexico and the secession of Texas.

Why didn't Lincoln feel the same about Southern secession? Following the money might help with an answer. Throughout most of our history, the only sources of federal revenue were excise taxes and tariffs. During the 1850s, tariffs amounted to 90 percent of federal revenue. Southern ports paid 75 percent of tariffs in 1859. What "responsible" politician would let that much revenue go?

 

Data and Statistics for these countries : Mexico | All
Gold and Silver Prices for these countries : Mexico | All
Tweet
Rate :Average note :3.9 (15 votes)View Top rated
Previous article by
Tom DiLorenzo
All articles by
Tom DiLorenzo
Next article by
Tom DiLorenzo
Receive by mail the latest articles by this author  
Latest comment posted for this article
Tommy's posts are great, the problem is that Jim C is an idiot. Let him get pissed off, the more the better I say. It's time Jim got over this love affair he has with Lincoln. It's time he stopped trying to obscure the truth.  Read more
Verboten - 6/27/2013 at 7:36 PM GMT
Rating :  3  0
TOP ARTICLES
Editor's picks
RSS feed24hGold Mobile
Gold Data CenterGold & Silver Converter
Gold coins on eBaySilver coins on eBay
Technical AnalysisFundamental Analysis

Tom DiLorenzo

Thomas DiLorenzo is professor of economics at Loyola College, Maryland, and a senior fellow at the Ludwig von Mises Institute. He is the author or co-author of ten books, on subjects such as antitrust, group-interest politics, and interventionism generally
Tom DiLorenzo ArchiveWebsite
Most recent articles by Tom DiLorenzo
8/17/2014
7/27/2014
7/13/2014
7/6/2014
6/1/2014
All Articles
Comment this article
You must be logged in to comment an article8000 characters max.
 
Sign in
User : Password : Login
Sign In Forgot password?
 
 
       
Does DiLorenzo write articles that are purely there to piss off Jim C ?
Rate :   3  3Rating :   0
EmailPermalink
Tommy's posts are great, the problem is that Jim C is an idiot. Let him get pissed off, the more the better I say. It's time Jim got over this love affair he has with Lincoln. It's time he stopped trying to obscure the truth.

Rate :   3  0Rating :   3
EmailPermalink
Once again DiLorenzo attacks Lincoln and once again DiLorenzo fails to condemn slavery, Jeff Davis, or any Southern General who murdered in support of slavery. Where are DiLorenzo's sympathies? It can't be with state secession as envisoned by Thomas Jefferson who proclaimed it valid only in response to tyranny -- for it was the South that was violating individual rights. And it certainly can't be because the North inititated violence -- for it was the South that did that as well.

The historical record, as DiLorenzo cherry picks, shows Lincoln was not an ardent abolitionist. He didn't have the support of William Lloyd Garrison the most influential abolitionist of the time. But Lincoln knew such a position would never get him elected, and he was inflamed by the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act allowing for slavery's expansion into newly formed states. The hisotrical record also contains Lincoln's many anti-slavery comments -- something DiLorenzo always neglects to mention. Lincoln also wrote and pushed through the 13th Amendment abolishing slavery forever.

DiLorenzo's concern is not individual rights, but states rights -- apparently even if those states allow the abomination of slavery.

Lincoln was not an unblemished individual, but compared to Presidents before, since, and current, he was a giant.
Rate :   8  3Rating :   5
EmailPermalink
In yet another comment, Jim C again completely ignores history and historical fact in an effort to burry the truth about Lincoln and tries to defame the author.
Rate :   6  1Rating :   5
EmailPermalink
Receive 24hGold's Daily Market Briefing in your inbox. Go here to subscribe or unsubscribe.
Disclaimer