Close X Cookies are necessary for the proper functioning of 24hGold.com. By continuing your navigation on our website, you are accepting the use of cookies.
To learn more about cookies ...
EnglishFrench
Gold & Silver Prices in

Want To Understand Lincoln?

IMG Auteur
 
Published : February 24th, 2013
657 words - Reading time : 1 - 2 minutes
( 15 votes, 3.9/5 ) , 4 commentaries
Print article
  Article Comments Comment this article Rating All Articles  
0
Send
4
comment
Our Newsletter...
FOLLOW : Europe, Mexico
Category : Editorials

Steven Spielberg's Lincoln has been a box-office hit and nominated for 12 Academy Awards, including best picture, best director and best actor for Daniel Day-Lewis, who portrayed our 16th president. I haven't seen the movie; therefore, this column is not about the movie but about a man deified by many. My colleague Thomas DiLorenzo, economics professor at Loyola University Maryland, exposed some of the Lincoln myth in his 2006 book, Lincoln Unmasked. Now comes Joseph Fallon, cultural intelligence analyst and former U.S. Army Intelligence Center instructor, with his new e-book, Lincoln Uncensored. Fallon's book examines 10 volumes of collected writings and speeches of Lincoln's, which include passages on slavery, secession, equality of blacks and emancipation. We don't have to rely upon anyone's interpretation. Just read his words to see what you make of them.

In an 1858 letter, Lincoln said, "I have declared a thousand times, and now repeat that, in my opinion neither the General Government, nor any other power outside of the slave states, can constitutionally or rightfully interfere with slaves or slavery where it already exists." In a Springfield, Ill., speech, he explained, "My declarations upon this subject of negro slavery may be misrepresented, but can not be misunderstood. I have said that I do not understand the Declaration (of Independence) to mean that all men were created equal in all respects." Debating with Sen. Stephen Douglas, Lincoln said, "I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of ... making voters or jurors of Negroes nor of qualifying them to hold office nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races, which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality."

You say, "His Emancipation Proclamation freed the slaves! That proves he was against slavery." Lincoln's words: "I view the matter (Emancipation Proclamation) as a practical war measure, to be decided upon according to the advantages or disadvantages it may offer to the suppression of the rebellion." He also wrote: "I will also concede that emancipation would help us in Europe, and convince them that we are incited by something more than ambition." At the time Lincoln wrote the proclamation, war was going badly for the Union. London and Paris were considering recognizing the Confederacy and considering assisting it in its war effort.

The Emancipation Proclamation was not a universal declaration. It detailed where slaves were freed, only in those states "in rebellion against the United States." Slaves remained slaves in states not in rebellion – such as Kentucky, Maryland and Delaware. The hypocrisy of the Emancipation Proclamation came in for heavy criticism. Lincoln's own secretary of state, William Seward, said, "We show our sympathy with slavery by emancipating slaves where we cannot reach them and holding them in bondage where we can set them free."

Lincoln did articulate a view of secession that would have been welcomed in 1776: "Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing government and form a new one that suits them better. ... Nor is this right confined to cases in which the whole people of an existing government may choose to exercise it. Any portion of such people that can may revolutionize and make their own of so much of the territory as they inhabit." But that was Lincoln's 1848 speech in the U.S. House of Representatives regarding the war with Mexico and the secession of Texas.

Why didn't Lincoln feel the same about Southern secession? Following the money might help with an answer. Throughout most of our history, the only sources of federal revenue were excise taxes and tariffs. During the 1850s, tariffs amounted to 90 percent of federal revenue. Southern ports paid 75 percent of tariffs in 1859. What "responsible" politician would let that much revenue go?


Companies Mentionned : Southern |
Data and Statistics for these countries : Mexico | All
Gold and Silver Prices for these countries : Mexico | All
<< Previous article
Rate :Average :3.9 (15 votes)
>> Next article
Latest comment posted for this article
Tommy's posts are great, the problem is that Jim C is an idiot. Let him get pissed off, the more the better I say. It's time Jim got over this love affair he has with Lincoln. It's time he stopped trying to obscure the truth.  Read more
Verboten - 6/27/2013 at 8:36 PM GMT
Rating :  3  0
Top articles
World PM Newsflow
ALL
GOLD
SILVER
PGM & DIAMONDS
OIL & GAS
OTHER METALS
Comments closed
  All Favorites Best Rated  
Does DiLorenzo write articles that are purely there to piss off Jim C ?
Rate :   3  3Rating :   0
EmailPermalink
Tommy's posts are great, the problem is that Jim C is an idiot. Let him get pissed off, the more the better I say. It's time Jim got over this love affair he has with Lincoln. It's time he stopped trying to obscure the truth.

Rate :   3  0Rating :   3
EmailPermalink
Once again DiLorenzo attacks Lincoln and once again DiLorenzo fails to condemn slavery, Jeff Davis, or any Southern General who murdered in support of slavery. Where are DiLorenzo's sympathies? It can't be with state secession as envisoned by Thomas Jefferson who proclaimed it valid only in response to tyranny -- for it was the South that was violating individual rights. And it certainly can't be because the North inititated violence -- for it was the South that did that as well.

The historical record, as DiLorenzo cherry picks, shows Lincoln was not an ardent abolitionist. He didn't have the support of William Lloyd Garrison the most influential abolitionist of the time. But Lincoln knew such a position would never get him elected, and he was inflamed by the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act allowing for slavery's expansion into newly formed states. The hisotrical record also contains Lincoln's many anti-slavery comments -- something DiLorenzo always neglects to mention. Lincoln also wrote and pushed through the 13th Amendment abolishing slavery forever.

DiLorenzo's concern is not individual rights, but states rights -- apparently even if those states allow the abomination of slavery.

Lincoln was not an unblemished individual, but compared to Presidents before, since, and current, he was a giant.
Rate :   8  3Rating :   5
EmailPermalink
In yet another comment, Jim C again completely ignores history and historical fact in an effort to burry the truth about Lincoln and tries to defame the author.
Rate :   6  1Rating :   5
EmailPermalink
Subscribe to 24hGold’s daily market briefing
  • Prices and data of precious metals in 119 currencies and world mining companies
  • Daily analysis of the economy, markets and more
  • Free, daily and indispensable
Stay informed, subscribe now !
* Your email will never be shared.