In the same category

Why Study Economics?

IMG Auteur
From the Archives : Originally published June 30th, 2002
561 words - Reading time : 1 - 2 minutes
( 7 votes, 3.7/5 )
Print article
  Article Comments Comment this article Rating All Articles  
0
Send
0
comment
Our Newsletter...
Category : Fundamental Ideas





"I place economy among the first and most important virtues and public debt among the greatest of dangers; we must make our choice between economy and liberty; or profusion and servitude. If we can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of caring for them, they will be happy." (Thomas Jefferson)


In his statement, Jefferson used the term 'economy' in two slightly different senses. When he said economy was "among the first and most important virtues", he meant careful and thrifty management of public revenue. When he said we have to choose between economy and liberty, he was addressing the question of where the focus of government should be - whether government should expand its budget and provide public services or focus on protecting life, liberty, and property.


Jefferson understood better that any political leader in world history that government 'profusion' could only be paid by "the labors of the people." He knew that a growing government budget and an extension of the services government offers "under the pretense of caring for [the people]" can only come at the expense of private property and individual liberty.


The so-called 'new economics' of John Maynard Keynes formalized and gave quasi-scientific status to economic fallacies that are as old as civilized man. He provided a rationalization for government intervention into free market, for governmental control of the supply of money and credit, and for policies of irresponsible deficit spending and inflationary expansionism.


With very few exceptions, politicians and members of academia have taken his fallacies as axiomatic principles and expanded them into a hopelessly complex system of terms, symbols, and mathematical equations. They foster the view that only government, supported by countless task forces, high-paid consultants, and innumerable subcommittees and bureaucratic agencies can find the right set of 'compromises' to mange the mixed bag of interests in our nation.


They allege that the government should manage the economy by inflating the supply of money and credit to encourage production, while simultaneously taxing the 'excess profits' of the most productive industries; by deficit spending to provide the 'underprivileged' with 'equal opportunity', while forcing the businesses that might have been able to employ them to provide minimum wages, matching social security contributions, and unemployment insurance; by imposing trade barriers to encourage domestic industry, while simultaneously providing 'developing' third world countries with low cost loans or outright grants so that they will be our 'friends'; and the list goes on and on.


As appealing as this sounds we can't reverse cause and effect. Prosperity cannot be created with the stroke of a pen on a new bill in Congress. A money printing press cannot produce real wealth. If it could, we'd have eliminated poverty shortly after Gutenburg's 1440 invention.


Economics isn't a mystical realm, nor is it the province of geniuses or specialists with some kind of special insight akin to religious revelation. If you balance your checkbook each month and understand that you can't operate with a negative balance indefinitely, you already know more about economics than most government policy makers.


Resources:


  • Methods of a Wall Street Master by Victor Sperandeo.
  • Mises.org a website devoted to the Austrian School of Economics, a school of economic thought founded by Carl Menger (Feb 28, 1840 - Feb 26, 1921) with his work Principles of Economics published in 1871.



Mike Hewitt

Editor

DollarDaze.org





 



<< Previous article
Rate : Average note :3.7 (7 votes)
>> Next article
Mike Hewitt is the editor of www.DollarDaze.org, a website pertaining to commentary on the instability of the global fiat monetary system and investment strategies on mining companies.
Comments closed
Latest comment posted for this article
Be the first to comment
Add your comment
Top articles
Latest Comments
Top Ten Reasons I Buy Gold Silver [#7] - These Assets Come With a ...
21 Sepvictoriashores1
HI Jeff I have read your articles with a lot of interest in your feelings with the future of Gold and Silver. I'm 75 years of age and have ...
What Is the Correct Amount of Money?
20 Sepgfs543
If money is the heart of the economy, then the economies of the world are running with diseased hearts. Keynesians and other monetary intervention...
Pushback
20 SepGypsy
James, you're getting more difficult to read. As a Deplorable, I realize my under-education leaves me at a disadvantage when faced against the Mer...
Pushback
18 Sepdennyc3
If a university professor has been on the job for more than five years without venturing out into the world there's usually nothing to learn here. ...
Rude Awakening for the US in January? No, Just More Alarmist BS Fro...
18 SepDRGEORGE
The world & the US $ have been on the brink for 10 years (or more). In 2008 it nearly happened but giving the 1% a stack of money saved the day. It...
'No evidence' of gold market manipulation, CPM Group's Christian in...
15 Sepneville
Despite being a so-called GOLD website ,I have read more anti GOLD articles on kitco than on any other site. Yes chris you are absolutely corre...
Rude Awakening for the US in January? No, Just More Alarmist BS Fro...
15 SepSilverthumb2
I used to enjoy listening to Rickards. He sold out when he signed on with Agora Financial. Now he's just another ranting alarmist trying to get ri...
What's Killing the Jobs Market?
13 SepJ.0
It is hard to know where to begin to respond to your comment Recusant. You do not seem to understand how markets work. So, I'll throw out some po...
Most commented articlesFavoritesMore...
World PM Newsflow
ALL
GOLD
SILVER
PGM & DIAMONDS
OIL & GAS
OTHER METALS