Chart usGOLD   Chart usSILVER  
 
Food for thought
The heart of a statestman must be in his head
Napoléon Bonaparte  
Search for :
LATEST NEWS  :
MINING STOCKS  :
Subscribe
Write Us
Add to Google
Search on Ebay :
PRECIOUS METALS (US $)
Gold 1294.08-0.58
Silver 19.630.01
Platinum 1404.500.00
Palladium 794.900.90
WORLD MARKETS
DOWJONES 16409-16
NASDAQ 40969
NIKKEI 1451699
ASX 544532
CAC 40 443226
DAX 941092
HUI 220-2
XAU 90-1
CURRENCIES (€)
AUS $ 1.4802
CAN $ 1.5214
US $ 1.3811
GBP (£) 0.8224
Sw Fr 1.2201
YEN 141.4700
CURRENCIES ($)
AUS $ 1.0722
CAN $ 1.1021
Euro 0.7241
GBP (£) 0.5956
Sw Fr 0.8833
YEN 102.4300
RATIOS & INDEXES
Gold / Silver65.92
Gold / Oil12.41
Dowjones / Gold12.68
COMMODITIES
Copper 3.050.02
WTI Oil 104.300.83
Nat. Gas 4.740.21
Market Indices
Metal Prices
RSS
Precious Metals
Graph Generator
Statistics by Country
Statistics by Metals
Advertise on 24hGold
Projects on Google Earth
Will Facebook Be Destroyed?
by Chris Wood - Casey Research
Published : August 13th, 2011
1104 words - Reading time : 2 - 4 minutes
( 2 votes, 5/5 ) Print article
 
    Comments    
Tweet
Keywords :   Egypt | Facebook | Government | Syria |

 

 

 

 

 The hacktivist “group” Anonymous may be plotting to destroy Facebook on November 5. (The date should ring a bell for you history buffs and fans of the movie V for Vendetta.)

On July 16, this video was uploaded to YouTube claiming to be from Anonymous and vowing to “kill Facebook for the sake of your own privacy.” The computerized voice in the video states that Facebook has been selling information to government agencies and giving clandestine access to information security firms (some of which allegedly work for authoritarian governments like Egypt and Syria) so that they can spy on people around the world.

Because of these alleged actions, the “medium of communication you all so dearly adore will be destroyed.”

Or will it?

If the video is truly from Anonymous and the “group” really has an “Operation Facebook” seeking to destroy the social media giant, Zuckerberg et al. could have reason to worry. Remember, Anonymous has successfully hacked such organizations as News Corp., Bank of America, NATO, various U.S. military contractors, and perhaps even the Pentagon.

What’s more, Anonymous’ botnet army appears to be growing rapidly. (Note: Botnet, short for robotic network, is the general term used to denote a collection of compromised computers that are running under a command-and-control infrastructure. A botnet allows one person or group to have a large number of “zombie” computers at his/its fingertips. The Mariposa botnet busted by Spanish authorities in March 2010 had approximately 13 million computers under its control.)

Already, by December 2010, after Anonymous launched “Operation Payback,” security outfit Imperva’s Hacker Intelligence Initiative had reported that downloads of the LOIC tool Anonymous uses to launch its distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks had exceeded 40,000. At the time, Imperva reckoned that Anonymous was in the process of coordinating botnets with over 100,000 computers. Imperva’s CTO went on to speculate, “With the rate of machines engaging in this activity, we are speculating that the hacktivists are now operating using involuntary botnets – infecting unaware victims to involve them in this campaign.”

By now, there’s no telling how many computers could be under the control of Anonymous botnets. According to Gunter Ollmann of security provider Damballa, a classic DDoS attack might require 10,000 computers or more to plug the network pipes of a big website. But more sophisticated botnets could achieve the same result with only a few hundred machines. And the voluntary tools such as those spread by Anonymous had generally been getting more effective.

If the full weight of Anonymous were behind “Operation Facebook,” the hacktivists could probably cause the company serious harm. But this does not appear to be the case, at least for now.

The truth is that the situation is tough to decipher because the structure of Anonymous itself is ambiguous at best. According to a quote published by Gizmodo on Wednesday, one Anon (the popular term to refer to someone in Anonymous) described the “group” thusly:

Anonymous is a mindset, not a group. Mindsets do not have leaders. With any given operation, there are always some who agree and some who disagree. With opFaceBook specifically, there are those that agree and those that disagree. Anonymous allows each person individually to vote on each operation, a yes vote means they participate, a no vote means they do not. Anyone is allowed to create an op, and if others vote yes, it will get traction and something may be accomplished.

Nevertheless, the owners of the generally reliable AnonOps Twitter feed, whom many consider are the actual Anonymous “leadership,” have spoken out against “Operation Facebook” via tweet. And if we believe the tweets from AnonOps, it appears that the operation is being carried out by only a small group of Anons.

On Wednesday (August 10), the Website Gawker summarized the story that was laid out in a (somewhat profane) document posted to Pastebin by an Anon called Speakeasy who claimed the whole fiasco is a terrible misunderstanding. According to Speakeasy, “Operation Facebook” was launched several months ago and had between 10 and 20 members. The goal of the operation was not kill Facebook but “to bring attention to the fact that Facebook stored the data of user accounts” (even after you delete your account), and later “to develop an ethical, anonymous Facebook alternative.”

The op would entail recommending Facebook users delete their profiles on November 5 in protest and writing the source code to develop a Facebook alternative. The project was eventually scrapped for various reasons, including boredom on behalf of the members involved and the announcement of anonplus, an anonymous social network, similar to the one that was being developed at opFacebook. But apparently, nobody shut down the channel on the Anonymous chat server after the project was scrubbed and the scraps of the operation became fodder for rumors and speculation.

As Gawker reported:

See, the Operation Facebook kids had started a crowd sourced document to plan their protest; when they disbanded, everything was deleted from the document except for a single line warning Facebook that it would "never forget" November 5th—the date that had been floated for the mass account deactivation.

The chat room was left, empty except for a link to this cryptic threat. Eventually some Anons stumbled on the empty room and rumors started circulating about Operation Facebook. Speculation ranged from physical attacks on Facebook's server to some newly discovered exploit that would bring the site crashing to its knees. Someone made a video about this new, destructive Operation Facebook—Speakeasy says they don't know who—media outlets picked up the video, which now has more than a million views. Now Facebook is slated to be destroyed by year's end.

Speakeasy’s claims, along with various other evidence including the relatively poor production values of the YouTube video compared with previous Anonymous videos and the fact that Anonymous has never before given more than a couple days’ warning for an impending cyber-attack, support the contention that “Operation Facebook” is the work of a small rogue cell on the fringe of Anonymous. Even a temporary outage or slowdown of Facebook would be a significant undertaking for a small group such as this.

So Facebook is probably safe. But that doesn’t change the fact that some very talented hackers want to destroy the site. If they recruit more of the same to support their cause, then who knows…

David again. On a somewhat related note, there have been a number of stories recently about hackers overtly taking on government agencies and bragging they will increasingly be taking to the man.

It will be interesting to see who comes out on top in that particular fight.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Data and Statistics for these countries : Egypt | Syria | All
Gold and Silver Prices for these countries : Egypt | Syria | All
Tweet
Rate :Average note :5 (2 votes)View Top rated
Previous article by
Chris Wood
All articles by
Chris Wood
Next article by
Chris Wood
Receive by mail the latest articles by this author  
Latest comment posted for this article
Be the first to comment
Add your comment
TOP ARTICLES
Editor's picks
RSS feed24hGold Mobile
Gold Data CenterGold & Silver Converter
Gold coins on eBaySilver coins on eBay
Technical AnalysisFundamental Analysis

Chris Wood

Chris is the senior analyst for Casey's Extraordinary Technology and The Casey Report.
Most recent articles by Chris Wood
7/15/2013
6/6/2013
3/16/2013
2/15/2013
1/25/2013
All Articles
Comment this article
You must be logged in to comment an article8000 characters max.
 
Sign in
User : Password : Login
Sign In Forgot password?
 
Receive 24hGold's Daily Market Briefing in your inbox. Go here to subscribe or unsubscribe.
Disclaimer