 In market anarchy, true professionals would drive out such unscrupulous competitors.
---------------
Perhaps but especially a Southern man can admire how Yankee Doodle establishes the pulse. What drives the United States through time despite government critics then is the baseline interplay between its three main governmental bodies. This celtic knot, politikos triangle, civic trifecta is both strong and generative. Its purpose is substantial. Its roots are even more deeply in debt to Plato than your claim that rapists know its wrong to rape.
Better formulated, rapists can be shown their ignorance. They can be reeducated that it is wrong to rape even if this reduces to the law applied some opportunity cost (penalty) via criminal sentence AND society has an obligation to do execute it because this outcome is both just and expedient. The beaurocracy on the other hand only appears to engender posterity. It's purpose is accidental. Restated, America truly is the beautiful. All will know this if she should falter in a way that requires implementation of some alternative.
Incidently, attempts to alter pulse in this country are both anticipated by founders and also deadly ground. This life or death is true everytime and in every form in which they occur. More pulse. This thing kicks. Ever vigilant, in this country We Fight All The Time Just For The Right To Keep Fighting, the initial caps are so even Sun Tzu knows who we Americans are. Most nations can't handle the truth!
The current President of the United States (and his legal team) pretend to be a bunch of constitutional baboons. Healthcare Reform, for example, in the form of a mandate finds bad law like a little kid with 30 cavities stealing another cookie - but that's just more deadly ground. All inroads against pulse are so ascribed. This one among other things deprives citizenry of outrage via taxation for service provided.
Yet it is citizens who mandate the government not the other way around. Exceptions are exceptional. The idea that government can reduce cost via service provided encroachment on private industry is not. Was that truly the argument for Social Security for example? Even if it was, the case is different regards Healthcare Reform, for example.
Consider, an independently wealthy (or just healthy) person (a lottery winner, nba player, gold investor, villain, politician, or lucky one, etc) can in theory (and practice if manageable) opt out of social security tax by never working and so avoiding the tax. But now nonetheless same individual cannot choose to not subscribe to the gov mandated health insurance, because beholden to some alleged cost reduciing common good - and that 1) even if wealthy person could afford to pay per view, and 2) even if the government never proves cost reduction. May the Supreme Court reassert turf on this issue cruelly (if inclined) as it is designed by charter to do and crush this bugaboo.
But above doesn't cover true cost. The temptation of graft placed on intelligent people in government is the constitutional concern. Nothing prevents, in the case of Healthcare Reform by mandate, as but one example of ill-wrought of self serving, self absorbed, political ping pong from ensuing between entrenched political superstructures. Now with each new super majority simply fine tunes (or better, calibrates) the previous unimplemented effort, getting paid to do on tax payer dime without ever having to raise taxes and so face tax payer scrutiny and outrage.
It matters not. To the intent of the law, hurlyburly ill-wrought is so by essence not leverage; i.e., if say clever cabal pandered Healthcare Reform to populace just for a chance to expand govermental power granted by constitution through inclusion of unrestrained mandate, then the resulting Reform is bankrupt because the government chose mandates, not because they pandered to needy people. Verily, to their eternal glory, this country's constitutional founders and subsequent jurisprudence still declare (push comes to shove) we fuck that kind of bullshit and straightup and to the hilt and just for having arrived.
Because both time wasted and wreckless legislative overreach are judicially offensive. The former hurts many parties. In the case of Healthcare Reform alone industry as beset upon, government as further in debt, and citizenry as falsely promised. God knows what the next unilateral, supermajority mandated Reform would seek to secure. The latter is again all over again simply deadly ground. It is right for the Supreme Court to defend with extreme prejudice against such a power grab when it is aimed as it is at blasting the bedrock substance of the constitution itself.
Thus, culling out such slipshod alternative to accountabiliy as trash and ridiculing their proponents declares the true American political pulse when politics is being practiced in this country.
Same as it ever was; this country obligates its educated citizenry and that education (argued here by recourse) as means allow. If corruption is part of the game and rooting it out is a kind of winning, so too the most fundamental enemy remains tyranny. On all counts Obama (and his supporters short of public retraction) should be ashamed, or made to feel shame, if need be. Task need not be hard. Just ask America's first candy ass, fundamentally self-serving president to list his first term achievements. Rule out only any 'coulda woulda shoulda.'
Identify the resulting dearth as 'still more deficit', for that is what it is. It sure isn't a feather in the cap of any fool headed, wanton rube Commander in Chief, let alone in his Harvard bestowed, UChicago notorized, pretender headdress. That's on all them regards this 'fucking own home pillager President caught in the act.' Public retraction and defense of integrity of institution is in order. Taste it, mister - Hulk Hogan had to pioneer the just and expedient. If short here again academe, then scorn received is gruesome disfigurement as fucking ugly like to Obama so like ye shall be - it damn sure ain't macaroni.
The call then must be to the neo-classical. It must go to the early 21st Century American essentially. As the Virginian Wirt (a transplant from Maryland) had it first from the Virginian Tucker (a transplant from Bermuda), 'Give me Liberty or give me death', demanded Patrick Henry of the state of Virginia in 1765. In America tall knows this ruth, said two centuries later, Pusser from Tennessee, in both word and deed. A transplant from Missouri, I myself write from Sangamon County, Illinois. What is your quality, sir? Commented 4555 days ago |
