Recevez notre Marketbriefing
In the same category
Iesos
Member since January 2013
24 commentaries -
0 followers
has posted a comment on the article :
>What Americans Used To Know  - Tom DiLorenzo - lewRockwell
There are a few things you state that look like assumptions and then you mention main stream thinking. first of all:

"Let us now add to the count that you all profess to believe in God, you are all not just Christians, but evangelic Christians and the 3 of you zealously dispute the theory of evolution while touting creationism." All Christians whether Evangelical or Catholic will dispute evolution, nothing out of the main stream there. But you seem to have concluded that they are all Evangelical without any of them saying so. This to me looks like you’re making it up as there isn't one comment that both Evangelicals and Catholics wouldn't make in their posts. I do know that you hate Christians, I’ve read where you treat them as lesser beings so to me this looks like another of your attempts to discredit anyone who proclaims to be a Christian. I would say that you just made all of this up in an effort to present something to back what you’re saying.

You mention things being in the main stream when critiquing them. But you state "You all come across as believing that only gold is money." The great majority of people on this site believe gold to be money so it wouldn’t be unusual that they all believe that.

Then you put "Not one of the 3 amigos differs in the slightest when it comes to what is thought of American foreign policy or domestic politics…." Well I'm not one of them but I agree with everything they have said about the way our countries government has been interfering all over the world. This is also a mainstream item in these forums as there are posts by others with the same tone. When I look at your second post, part 2, I see nothing there that can't be named assumptions no matter how hard you try to show them as solid proof. You presented a dogs breakfast here, you’ve thrown together a bunch of nonsense and I for one don't believe any of your lengthy rants to be true. I suspect that because all three have gone after you, albeit rather harshly but certainly with less contempt than you show those you dislike, you are now trying to back pedal and regain some respect. Nothing more.


Commented
3933 days ago
-
Send
Beginning of the headline :"During the weeks following the [1860] election, [Northern newspaper] editors of all parties assumed that secession as a constitutional right was not in question . . . . On the contrary, the southern claim to a right of peaceable withdrawal was countenanced out of reverence for the natural law principle of government by consent of the governed." ~ Howard Cecil Perkins, editor, Northern ... Read More
Reply to this comment
You must be logged in to comment an article8000 characters max.
Log in or Sign up
Top articles