 Alrighty here we go.
My company has nothing to do with energy but it is a high tech innovator. I’d sure like to see what experience you have backing yourself, what maybe a few years of college, a failed attempt at some degree, a B of arts? Your obviously not completely uneducated, just gullibile.
You won’t go ahead and bother to analyze every piece of tripe I’ve written as it’s a waste of your time. No it’s not a waste of time, it’s simply the truth and you liberals who want to put more money into big corporations hands don’t want the truth exposed. In fact I’m sure the truth of MMGW burns your eyes never mind that single cell you call a brain.
You never mention the NOAA chart detailing the severity of tropical storms and hurricanes since 1851, you know the one that shows there has been no increase of severity or number of storms. Come on, take a look, see what the truth looks like.
“Oh, by the way your so called expert Edmund Contoski, well what can I say: not a scientist of any worth from what I can see. But then this is par for the course for deniers.”
You once again conveniently ignored Dr. Gray completely and went after Contoski. How about you man up and take on Dr. Gray, the focus of what Contoski wrote? You got nothing you can use to counter Dr. Gray so you go after the author of the article rather than the substance and here AGAIN you accuse me of doing this exact thing. How about going after all of the other links I presented you, got no guts to see that your actually wrong? This is a typical liberal bullshit tactic, if you can’t refute the truth then go after the man presenting it.
You have yet to provide one shred of evidence to back up your claims, oh wait you did give that link to a NASA graph which you have used as the sum of your argument. I have offered several items that blow your little attempt to further the bogus claims of the IPCC out of the water.
Be a man, or at least a grown up, have a look at how many of the contributors are having to take legal action against the UN to have their names removed from the list of scientists who support MMGW because the contributed data that shows there is no MMGW. Come on, grow a set and have a look and what the final list of supporters looks like, mechanics, refuse engineers (garbage collectors, how appropriate) and dozens of individuals, while not stupid, that have no education or profession that actually can be a linked to climate science.
Our powers of observation fail you. I have used a German word, Schwerpunkt (you may want to look up it's definition) but it does not mean I am German and even if I was that would be nothing to be ashamed of as Germans have been, are, and always will be hard working people, the people others like you look to for support when you fail.
You’d like to debate this with me when I’m older, what just short of sixty isn’t old enough for you or is it that I simply have far more life experience and it threatens you that you would write such a blatantly stupid comment? What a classic juvenile attempt to gain respect for yourself.
Global warming has played out now for over 20 years and none of the predictions that have been used to back up the IPCC crapola has actually happened. All that has happened is that the world has kept going, weather has been alternating between warm and cold just as it has been for hundreds of centuries. The only thing that has changed in all of this time is that a bunch of liberals supporting big corporations has come along and tried to make man responsible for something that doesn’t actually exist. Hocus pokus, wishes and dreams of the liberal crowd, and large piles of manure is all that’s left of the theory of MMGW.
 Commented 3755 days ago |
