Recevez notre Marketbriefing
In the same category
Schwerpunkt
Member since October 2012
52 commentaries -
0 followers
has posted a comment on the article :
>Global Warming Chickenlittleism  - Richard Mills - Ahead of the Herd
"ich bin ein jehmahls Berliner" Really? You sure seemed to hate on Germans, you have some sort of self-hate thing going on?

My profession, RF and software engineer. No central bank positions, or any bank positions for that matter, on my resume.

Ok big mouth, Shweinhund, wow, you really can’t argue the subject so you take on the man. Wasn't that what you accused me of? And you have the gall to state "You certainly are an offensive son of a bitch." I understand this, its the last resort of any liberal when they face the truth and can't answer the accusation, they deflect and start name calling.

"you think that I must be a dumb arse idiot". I never thought that until you started acting like a dumb arse idiot. Sorry for coming to that realization so late. I should have simply assumed it from the start and saved a lot of time.

"Although the canary in the coal mine has been sending a message only simpletons still cling to linear changes in such short time frames."

Ok, go ahead and tell us what the canary has been singing, show us the proof you have so far completely avoided. Given the way the pro MMGW crowd distort things the canary should have croaked from over exposure to co2 or heat, either that or be 20 feet underwater but in any case dead. But that's the funny thing about this canary, it’s still singing and I didn't see any water wings on it.

"The problem with climate change deniers is that they for the most part want to dissect a whole pile of data" Do you have even a rudimentary understanding of how scientific study is conducted? If there is a weak link it MUST be taken into account when looking at the over all. The only way to prove any scientific theory is to test, reproduce, and otherwise either confirm or disprove the theory as a whole. Based on the fact that the MMGW theory encompasses the globe you cannot simply choose NOT count any item that goes against the theory and then say the theory is still sound.

The 20 year period is what the IPCC, not me, stated it would take to prove its theory. In that time the oceans temperatures would rise by >3 degree C, didn't happen, In that period of time the world temperatures would increase by >3 degree C, didn't happen. If you’re going to defend a theory then at least bother to understand the basic premises the theory was to be gauged against.

You hold a degree in aeronautical engineering! You don't understand basic scientific procedures but they allow you to design systems or parts that fit onto aircraft, aircraft that actually has to rely on your methods to safe guard people?

Ahh and there it is, the final attempt to discredit, "Don't bother responding. I have no more time for debate with offensive despots". As I had said earlier, juvenile attempts to discredit someone else in order to make yourself look good. Any reader here will see that you haven't presented one item to back your stance where as I have provided data and commentary by real climate experts which you cant even bother to read as it may cause you to doubt your beloved theory.

ranbotrader, you are a real drama queen, in fact your more than that, a real princess.


Commented
3752 days ago
-
Send
Beginning of the headline :The nature of the recently released report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is extremely alarmist. The report warns, with a 95% certainty, that global warming is man-made and that the resulting  climate change will lead to: Rising temperatures, drought and increasing desertification Warming of the oceans and rising sea levels Shortages of food Loss of ice sheets & shrinking of glaciers Increasing intensity and size of storms There’s no doubt our climate is changing,... Read More
Reply to this comment
You must be logged in to comment an article8000 characters max.
Log in or Sign up
Top articles