Recevez notre Marketbriefing
In the same category
Gypsy
Member since May 2012
274 commentaries - 1 follower
1 followers
has posted a comment on the article :
>Piketty Dikitty Rikitty  - James Howard Kunstler - 
James, the outcome of the Nations States collapse which should have been followed by much smaller governing units reads like wishful thinking into the future. There was a moment when that collapse actually happened, back in 2007, but the CORRECT entire future was eliminated by the total theft of the entire world. None of what you see now is human-based. Everything now is based on computer generated mathematical algorithms force-feeding a desired outcome by the few who own the super computers capable of staying nano-seconds ahead of the logical outcomes of every man-made decision. Yes, this is new. Not socialism, not communism, not capitalism; it's more like computerism.

With thousands of people constantly entering the ten-thousand variables, it's obvious one person couldn't possibly understand how it's gone on THIS far. I know I can't; but as an observer I have always (until now) considered you several steps ahead of me. Now, it seems, we're more equal; more both at a loss for words.


Commented
3650 days ago
-
Send
Beginning of the headline :T he debate over Thomas Piketty’s new book Capital in the Twenty-First Century is as dumb as every other issue-set in the public arena these days — a product of failed mental models, historical blindness, hubris, and wishful thinking. Piketty’s central idea is that wealth will continue to accumulate and concentrate among individual rich families at ever-greater rates and therefore that nation-states should take a number of steps to prevent that from happening or at least attempt to correct it. T... Read More
Reply to this comment
You must be logged in to comment an article8000 characters max.
Log in or Sign up
Top articles