Recevez notre Marketbriefing
In the same category
overtheedge
Member since May 2012
680 commentaries - 6 followers
6 followers
has posted a comment on the article :
>The "Income Inequality" Debate Is Not About Income Inequality  - Nathan Lewis - New World Economics
So much wrong with this article, it is hard to summarize without being just as long.

However, the use of the word "amoral" comes close.
The only purpose for the word is to elicit a negative emotive response from the readers towards those who admit they consider self-interest the highest priority.

Then the idea that people dislike money earned through Shylockian means is bad versus entertainment monies is good is a delusional concept.
People are jealous about money matters. Then they hate whoever the effective minority claims to be evil.

All in all, this has all the trappings of soft socialism.


Commented
3579 days ago
-
Send
Beginning of the headline :As I see it, the problem of “income inequality” is not, for the most part, a problem of income inequality. When capitalism is working well, people do not particularly dislike the super-wealthy. If anything, they are celebrities and even heroes. For example: Larry Ellison, Steve Jobs, Alexander Rodriguez, Oprah Winfrey These people are super-rich. But, they also brought something valuable to society, in the form of software and computer hardware, media an... Read More
Reply to this comment
You must be logged in to comment an article8000 characters max.
Log in or Sign up
Top articles