Recevez notre Marketbriefing
In the same category
sam site
Member since February 2014
38 commentaries -
0 followers
has posted a comment on the article :
>Economic Abundance with a Shrinking Population: Why Not?  - Nathan Lewis - New World Economics
You advocate "Low Taxes, Stable Money". According to Mike Malloney, we're in the transition between unbacked Fiat currency and a return to genuine gold-backed money. I don't think many realize the pro-overpopulation effects of Fiat currency counterfeiting by our organized crime Jesuit-controlled Fed through their Zionist agents. It has created a false wealth that has encouraged families to irresponsibly procreate.

Many economist noted the steep decline in births during the 30s Depression. With the discipline gold provides, genuine money imposes a discipline on taxes as there is little slack in the system to afford this welfare and warfare state we have today courtesy of our Jesuit-controlled Fed and their counterfeiting our dollar.

I predict in the future if anyone advocates war they will have to personally put their money where their mouth is. Likewise for welfare, if you advocate supporting newborns at government expense you better be prepared to pay a monthly fee for your generousity. I'm an advocate of Ayn Rand who believes all taxes should be voluntary and free from government coercion.


Commented
3516 days ago
-
Send
Beginning of the headline :Perhaps one of the silliest myths around today, in my opinion, is the notion that a shrinking overall population naturally causes or leads to economic decline. This is gradually becoming more immediately relevant, as the fertility rate is below replacement on every continent except for Africa today. It’s true that a larger population will have a higher total GDP, simply because you are counting more people. However, you can have a large population with a... Read More
Reply to this comment
You must be logged in to comment an article8000 characters max.
Log in or Sign up
Top articles