Articles NewsFlow Gold & Silver Prices Market Briefing

Recevez notre Marketbriefing

In the same category
Yen USD: Wet Noodles Versus Gold Stewart Thomson Gold: A Surge Into Summer? Stewart Thomson Gold Stocks: Poised To Outperform Everything Stewart Thomson Dovish CPI: A Super Surge For Gold? Stewart Thomson The Anti-Concepts of Money: Conclusion Keith Weiner Gold Stocks: Good Times Are Here Stewart Thomson

BDB
Member since May 2012
40 commentaries -
Follows 1 member

0 followers

has posted a comment on the article :

Once-Peaceful Canada Turns Militaristic; Blowback Follows

- Ron Paul -

It is clear from your very first sentence that you are insulting, attacking, and being far from civil as is required by the comments policy. Clearly 24hrGold agreed with me.

Secondly, you remember in error. All I ever said on WMD was that I was there and I saw it--not that I know someone who knows someone who knows someone. So you're wrong there also.

Thirdly, you're the one that said there was NO mustard gas in Iraq--none whatsoever. That is YOUR claim, that I told you was false. The New York Times as well as wiki-leaks have now published stories (since you refuse to believe someone like myself that was there) demonstrating that, once again, you were WRONG. As I have always clearly stated, we may not have found new labs and an thriving new nuclear program, but Saddam did indeed have WMD in violation of UNSCR 687. That's a well established fact even in the open press, but--as I told you--I knew that from first-hand experience. Those claiming there were no WMD in Iraq whatsoever now need to defend that claim by specifying how the WMD mentioned in the NY Times article and as reported in wiki-leaks were weapons Iraq maintained in complete compliance with UNSCR 687. Good luck with that one. Bottom line: Those who stated there were WMD in Iraq no longer have to defend that claim; those who said there were none now have to prove that the weapons reported satisfied the requirements of UNSCR 687, subsequent resolutions, and the terms of the destruction protocol and inspection regime.

On those three points, you are just plain wrong. As for the issue of Canada, we just disagree.

Commented 3450 days ago

Send

Beginning of the headline :In 1968 the government of Canada decided to openly admit Americans seeking to avoid being drafted into the US war on Vietnam. Before, would-be immigrants were technically required to prove that they had been discharged from US military service. This move made it easier for Americans to escape President Johnson's war machine by heading north. Although a founding member of NATO, Canada did not join the United States in its war against Vietnam. The Canadian government did not see a confli... Read More

Reply to this comment

You must be logged in to comment an article

8000 characters max.

	RSS feed		24hGold Mobile
	Gold Data Center		Gold & Silver Converter
	Gold coins on eBay		Silver coins on eBay
	Technical Analysis		Fundamental Analysis