Recevez notre Marketbriefing
In the same category
billgreenjeans
Member since May 2012
38 commentaries -
0 followers
has posted a comment on the article :
>Professor Obama Gets an F  - Ron Paul - 
Ron Paul is one of the few who takes his oath/word seriously. It seems as if an attitude of prevarication is everywhere in Congress and the government. While Ron Paul's view of law and the Constitution is the correct one the Federal courts and government have another view of the law and the Constitution. If anyone reading this has been to law school or has ever had experience in the federal courts they will understand what I mean when I say 'leave the Constitution at the door before you enter the court room' because the Federal court has an entirely different view point on anyone appearing before it.
I will be surprised if Obamacare is struck down. The citizens of the federal districts and territories will be forced to by insurance or pay the penalty. Anyone who has ever entered into a contract with the U.S. government will be under this mandate. If you have ever filled a federal tax return you are one that is included in the law and mandate.
We got rid of the king because we didn't like dictators and now we replaced the king with a dictatorial government. To me there is no difference. A dictator is still a dictator regardless of the name. When the revolt gets in high gear then we can have an opportunity to return to the Constitution that Ron Paul is speaking about.


Commented
4405 days ago
-
Send
Beginning of the headline : Last week President Obama made some rather shocking comments at a press conference regarding the Supreme Court's deliberation on the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare.His comments belie a grasp of constitutional concepts so lacking that perhaps the University of Chicago Law School should offer a refund to any students "taught" constitutional law by then-Professor Obama! He said, "Ultimately, I'm confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress... Read More
Reply to this comment
You must be logged in to comment an article8000 characters max.
Log in or Sign up
Top articles