Recevez notre Marketbriefing
In the same category
Jim C.
Member since May 2012
463 commentaries - 3 followers
3 followers
has posted a comment on the article :
>Secession: Are We Free To Go?  - Ron Paul - 
Are States free to leave a Union/Association that tyrannizes its people? Yes, based on the abuse of individual rights.

Yet Ron Paul, and others (Rockwell, Judge Napalitano), show amazing confusion on the issue. Paul has argued that the South of 1860 had such a right of secession, even though the North showned no such tyranny, and even though the South was the abuser of individual rights via slavery. Clearly, a state has no right of secession if the goal is the preservation of the abuse of individual rights. So, again, a state cannot morally seceede from a union if the goal of that secession is to cement enslavement of people under that state's control.

Another problem: if Ron Paul is arguing secession based on whim then elements (counties, cities, neighborhoods, individuals) within that state may also logicaly secede -- everything devolving into anarchy. If anarchy is Ron Paul's real agenda then his ideas of secession will bring that about.



Commented
4174 days ago
-
Send
Beginning of the headline : Is all the recent talk of secession mere sour grapes over the election, or perhaps something deeper? Currently there are active petitions in support of secession forall 50 states, with Texas taking the lead in number of signatures.Texas has well over the number of signatures needed to generate a response from the administration, and while I wouldn't hold my breath on Texas actually seceding, I believe these petitions raise a lot of worthwhile questions about the nature of our union... Read More
Reply to this comment
You must be logged in to comment an article8000 characters max.
Log in or Sign up
Top articles