Recevez notre Marketbriefing
In the same category
Jim C.
Member since May 2012
463 commentaries - 3 followers
3 followers
has posted a comment on the article :
>The extraordinary lack of coverage of Ron Paul  - Eric de Carbonnel - Market Skeptics
This is amazing. All these responses in favor of Paul and NO ONE has addressed the issue of his comment in the debate: that, if President, he would NOT interfer with States coercing health care taxes from private citizens. This from a lover of individual liberty? Given that stance, what else would he not interfer with? Had he been President instead of Lincoln he would have allowed the South to leave the Union or made no attempt to prevent free states from going slave. I have put the question to his campaign headquarters several times and have yet to have a response. Talk about being snubbed.

Paul is a deeply flawed candidate who, despite some of his Libertarian views, is decidely anti-individual when push comes to shove.


Commented
4633 days ago
-
Send
Beginning of the headline : Is Ron Paul Getting the Coverage He Deserves? [NO] Nick Gillespie | August 17, 2011 Reason staffers Mike Riggs and Katherine Mangu-Ward were on the television yesterday to discuss the media’s response to what might be called "The Riddle of Ron Paul": Why do major newspapers, broadcast shows, and cable news outlets seem hell-bent on ignoring a 12-term GOP congressman who came in a tight second in the Iowa Straw Poll? Indeed, the results of that hokey quadrennial exercise in corn-dog politics was used to talk up Michelle Bachmann’s legitimacy... Read More
Reply to this comment
You must be logged in to comment an article8000 characters max.
Log in or Sign up
Top articles