Recevez notre Marketbriefing
In the same category
Peter C
Member since May 2012
35 commentaries -
0 followers
has posted a comment on the article :
>The extraordinary lack of coverage of Ron Paul  - Eric de Carbonnel - Market Skeptics
Dear Jim C.
Time to stop drinking "the KoolAid" buddy.
Since when can an almost seamless media black-out be quantified as "to some extent" ?

Per nukes - please keep in mind how many Nukes have been distributed by Uncle $cam ?

Per Iran - obviously you are swimming in all the KoolAid your U$$A MSM media is providing.
The only country on the planet with "dirty bombs" is AmeriKKKa, AND,,, ameriDUH? has the most nukes of all other nations combined - so what is your real point ???

Per Bin Laden - he had nothing to do with 911, a self inflicted false-flage by your own government, presumably co-opted by your ameriKKKan banksters in chorus with U$ MIC.
As an aside - bin Laden has been DEAD since late 2001 / early 2002 - so WAKE UP IDIOT !
The navy seals raid was a sham - MIS-DIRECTION for mindless minions - LIKE YOU !!

Turn off your TV and pull your head from your A$$ - unless you enjoy being a FOOL !!

Peter Carson
cansteel1978@yahoo.ca



Commented
4632 days ago
-
Send
Beginning of the headline : Is Ron Paul Getting the Coverage He Deserves? [NO] Nick Gillespie | August 17, 2011 Reason staffers Mike Riggs and Katherine Mangu-Ward were on the television yesterday to discuss the media’s response to what might be called "The Riddle of Ron Paul": Why do major newspapers, broadcast shows, and cable news outlets seem hell-bent on ignoring a 12-term GOP congressman who came in a tight second in the Iowa Straw Poll? Indeed, the results of that hokey quadrennial exercise in corn-dog politics was used to talk up Michelle Bachmann’s legitimacy... Read More
Reply to this comment
You must be logged in to comment an article8000 characters max.
Log in or Sign up
Top articles