Recevez notre Marketbriefing
In the same category
Jim C.
Member since May 2012
463 commentaries - 3 followers
3 followers
has posted a comment on the article :
>The Drone Threat  - Ron Paul - 
The flaw in Paul's argument, and Judge Napolitano's, against the use of drones is that they are categorically against them. They are correct that the rule of law should prevail, but only when such rule can be applied. When a terrorist who has murdered, citizen or not, is outside the continental United States and unabled to be extradited -- and is considered to be planning further attacks against our nation -- then the use of drones to eliminate that threat is morally justifiable.

Ron Paul is notorious for finding reasons for not protecting our nation, committed as he is to believing ANY government action is morally wrong.


Commented
4078 days ago
-
Send
Beginning of the headline :Last week, Senators threatened to put a "hold" on the nomination of John Brennan to be CIA director over his refusal to answer questions about the use of drones to kill Americans on US soil. That the president's nominee to head the agency that has used drones to kill perhaps thousands overseas could not deny their possible use at home should be shocking. How did we get to this point? The Obama administration has rapidly expanded the use of drones overseas, as they appear a way... Read More
Reply to this comment
You must be logged in to comment an article8000 characters max.
Log in or Sign up
Top articles