Last month, a BullionStar article titled “The
Fifth Wave: A new Central Bank Gold Agreement?” brought your attention to
the fact that the fourth and current round of the Central Bank Gold Agreement
(CBGA) run by a cartel of heavyweight central banks in Europe was about to
expire, and that these gold agreements, which have been running in rolling
five year periods since September 1999, were not designed for the purposes
they claimed to be.
That CBGA1 and CBGA2 from 1999 – 2008, were not intended to help the wider
gold market by limiting central bank gold sales, but were really a cover by
the central bank syndicate members to account for nearly 4000 tonnes of gold
that had already been sold or leased during the 1990s. That CBGA3 was then
used to distract the gold market about the secretive ‘gold sales’ that the
IMF claimed to have undertaken in 2010, which were really another book
squaring exercise for previously disposed IMF gold.
The heavyweight signatories to the central bank gold agreements (CBGAs)
include Eurozone member banks such as the Bundesbank,
the Banque
de France, Banca
Italia, De Nederlandsche Bank, National Bank of Belgium, the European
Central Bank (ECB) itself, as well as the non-Eurozone Swedish Riksbank
and the Swiss National Bank. In its composition, the consortium replicates
the nexus of the 1960s London Gold Pool (Switzerland, Germany, France, Italy,
Netherlands, Belgium) and the nexus of the central banks which met at the
Bank of International Settlements (BIS) in 1979 and the early 1980s to plan
a secretive new 1980s gold pool.
Last month’s article also pointed to the fact that this syndicate of
European central banks had also been absent as buyers of monetary gold over
the 1999 – 2019 period, when all around them central banks of nations such as
Russia, China, India, Turkey, and Kazakhstan were busily doing the opposite
and boosting their strategic monetary gold reserves.
The question then was, do these European central bank signatories to the
CBGAs have an agreement among themselves not to buy any gold, that is
contained in, for example, a non-public annex to the CBG Agreement? If so,
then as we explained:
“It would not be the first time that G10 and Switzerland central banks
agreed among themselves not to purchase gold. They did so in the mid 1970s
when in conjunction with the IMF, when “the countries in the Group of Ten and
Switzerland also agreed that there be no action to peg the price of
gold, and that the total stock of gold in the hands of the Fund and the
monetary authorities of the Group of Ten and Switzerland would not be
increased.”
Open Season on Gold Buying
While waiting for word from the European Central Bank (ECB) about a fifth
CBGA, the conclusion here last month was that:
“Given that the whole CBGA scheme was a cover whose main purpose has
already been achieved, there is no compelling logic for a fifth CBGA, except
of course unless there have been further physical gold flows out of western
central banks which need to be squared off in the books.”
Well, we don’t have to wait any longer, since the ECB, Swiss National
Bank, and Swedish Riksbank have all issued coordinated press releases dated
26th July, confirming that there will not be a fifth central bank
gold agreement when the current agreement expires in September 2019.
This is because, according to the ECB
press release, the signatory banks “conclude that a formal gold
agreement is no longer necessary” because they say “the market has
developed and matured”, more specifically that “since 1999 the
global gold market has developed considerably in terms of maturity, liquidity
and investor base.”
Given that the real reason for the CBGAs from 1999 onwards was to close
out previously sold and leased gold while hiding the transactions, this
excuse for non-renewal is irrelevant, but even in its wording about the
changing shape of the global gold market it is misleading.
The ECB – SNB – Riksbank press releases also mislead with the ironic claim
that “the Agreement contributed to balanced conditions in the gold market
by providing transparency regarding the intentions of the signatories”,
when in fact the Agreement was the complete opposite, i.e. a cover for gold
that had already been disposed of.
However, this latest news about the non-renewal of the CBGA is important
because it is the best evidence yet that there most likely is an unpublished
agreement among the participating European central banks not to buy any gold,
but that this private agreement not to buy gold is now being torn up. Which
would mean that open season for central bank gold buying is about to begin.
Now that it seems to be open season for central banks in Europe to begin
buying gold, the ECB still has an input on the subject, saying its governing
council update, also 26th July, that the decision not to renew the CBGA “is
without prejudice to each national central bank’s competences regarding the
management of its own gold reserves.”
The CBGA member press releases acknowledge the eagerness to buy gold,
saying that “central banks and other official institutions in general
have become net buyers of gold” and that “the signatories confirm that
gold remains an important element of global monetary reserves, as it
continues to provide asset diversification benefits.” The Swiss
National Bank press release adds some flavor claiming that the “gold
agreement [is] no longer necessary due to changes in market conditions and in
central bank activities.”
As none of the CBGA cartel central banks “currently has plans to sell
significant amounts of gold“, has it been a case of gold buying
envy as Russia, China and the even Poland
and Hungary
have piled into the yellow metal? It would certainly seem so.
The press release from the ECB can be read in pdf format here,
from the Swiss National Bank (SNB) in pdf format here, and from the
Swedish Riksbank in pdf format here.