Fermer X Les cookies sont necessaires au bon fonctionnement de 24hGold.com. En poursuivant votre navigation sur notre site, vous acceptez leur utilisation.
Pour en savoir plus sur les cookies...
AnglaisFrancais
Cours Or & Argent en

Guess What Happens In States Where Food Stamp Recipients Have To Work

IMG Auteur
Publié le 18 juillet 2017
760 mots - Temps de lecture : 1 - 3 minutes
( 1 vote, 1/5 ) , 3 commentaires
Imprimer l'article
  Article Commentaires Commenter Notation Tous les Articles  
0
envoyer
3
commenter
Notre Newsletter...

24hGold -  Guess What Happens ...

Leftists are constantly reminding of us of the merits of welfare. They tell us that without the help of taxpayer funded handouts, millions of Americans will starve or be left homeless. There’s no doubt that some people really do need help, but this black and white view of welfare doesn’t paint the full picture. Conservatives and libertarians have suspected for decades that many of the people on welfare are actually mooching off of the system. So to reconcile the need to help people who are helpless with the very really problem of people abusing the system, they’ve come up with a great compromise.

In regards to food stamps, they’ve suggested that we offer food assistance on the condition that the recipients are working. Or at the very least, that they volunteer or community service or are making an effort to train themselves for a new job. So what happens in states that have work requirements for food stamp recipients?

Alabama began 2017 by requiring able-bodied adults without children in 13 counties to either find a job or participate in work training as a condition for continuing to receive Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits.

According to AL.com, the number of those recipients declined from 5,538 to 831 between Jan. 1 and the beginning of May – an 85 percent drop.

Similar changes were implemented in select counties in Georgia and by the end of the first three months, the number of adults receiving benefits in three participating counties dropped 58 percent, according to the Georgia Public Policy Foundation.

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution recently reported that in 21 additional counties that restored the work requirement, there was a 62 percent drop in SNAP participants.

Of course many leftists will try to shoot holes in this data, by suggesting that perhaps many of these people were working unofficial jobs that paid under the table. Because of that, they were already doing the best they could, and the government cut off their benefits when they couldn’t prove that they were working. The only problem with that assumption, is that we know exactly what happens to people who have to choose between getting cut off from food stamps, and finding a job. Statistics show that they choose to find a job, and their incomes go up drastically. They really weren’t working in the first place.

In October 2014, LePage announced that able-bodied adults would have to find work, spend 20 hours per week in a work program, or perform community service for six hours a week.

Food stamp participation declined 14.5 percent from 235,771 in January 2014 to 201,557 in January 2015, according to the state.

An analysis of a group of 7,000 Mainers who left SNAP in 2014 found their total earnings increased from $3.85 million in the third quarter 2014 to $8.24 million in the last quarter of 2015.

Kansas saw a 75 percent decline after implementing work requirements in 2013. In addition, nearly 60 percent of former beneficiaries found employment within 12 months and their incomes rose by an average of 127 percent per year, according to the Foundation for Government Accountability.

The left will never admit it, but there’s plenty of evidence to suggest that many of the people receiving welfare benefits are able bodied, and fully capable of finding a job. We know this, because when they’re given the choice between losing a couple hundred dollars per month in benefits, and finding a job that will earn them enough money to not need benefits, they choose to find work. We’re subsiding millions of people who just don’t want to work.

And the other detail that the left will conveniently overlook, is that these people are basically siphoning off money from folks who are genuinely in a bad financial place. There would be more money for people who are actually poor.

This is money that could be spent on those who work their hands to the bone every day to provide for their families, and still can’t pay their bills. Or it could be spent on people who simply need to make ends meet while they’re between jobs. If not for these welfare queens, the government could provide more benefits to people who actually need help. That would lift them out of poverty faster, which could reduce the taxpayer’s burden in the long run.

In short, there’s a lot of people taking advantage of welfare programs like food stamps, which takes money away from the people who really need help in our society. And the left’s welfare policies are enabling them.

Source : www.shtfplan.com
<< Article précedent
Evaluer : Note moyenne :1 (1 vote)
>> Article suivant
Publication de commentaires terminée
  Tous Favoris Mieux Notés  
Then, how about making the banksters do some real, productive work in return for the taxpayer funded bailouts they received - like rebuilding worn-out infrastructure, etc.
Evaluer :   3  0Note :   3
EmailPermalink
As a left-leaning independent, community service seems like a great idea as a prerequisite for food stamps for single childless recipients. But, as the article points out, it may hinder under-the-table occupations that do not provide enough income. Someway must be found to offer assistance to those that have a low paying, technically illegal jobs.
Evaluer :   1  1Note :   0
EmailPermalink
@ Recusant,

Your last sentence hints at the root problem - socialism has made (low wage) work illegal in this country. To provide a low paying job, one must break the law. Minimum wage laws and other government programs have priced many people out of the workforce. The work still needs to be done, so it must be done illegally (under the table). Much of the food production in the U.S. relies on this illegal employment.

The solution is simple, but impossible, legalize work. Make it legal to work without a tax id (SSN). Make all govt. assistance programs optional, OASDI, Medicare, SS, etc......
Evaluer :   1  2Note :   -1
EmailPermalink
Dernier commentaire publié pour cet article
@ Recusant, Your last sentence hints at the root problem - socialism has made (low wage) work illegal in this country. To provide a low paying job, one must break the law. Minimum wage laws and other government programs have priced many people out of  Lire la suite
J. - 25/07/2017 à 19:54 GMT
Note :  1  2
Top articles
Flux d'Actualités
TOUS
OR
ARGENT
PGM & DIAMANTS
PÉTROLE & GAZ
AUTRES MÉTAUX