Justice prevails today in our court system like sunlight in a sewer.
Today’s system is a travesty of judicial arrogance, prosecutorial suppression
of evidence, attorney greed, and special interest cupidity. More and more the
goal of justice is being replaced by simply “volume of convictions” achieved
by any means in order to convey the appearance of effectiveness. Gold stars
for one’s performance board have become everyone’s obsession. The sheer
weight of numbers now rules our motives in the world that modernity has
created for us.
The root cause of this travesty is our abandonment of an objective code of
morality (via the teaching of MORAL RELATIVISM in our schools), which has
turned our prosecutors, attorneys and judges into shameless Machiavellians
rather than high-minded upholders of truth. Consequently our courts today
have become Orwellian madhouses, dragging gullible victims through trials of
ruthless expediency and irrationality, and pawning it all off as a “justice
system.”
In their book, The Tyranny of Good Intentions, Paul Craig Roberts
and Lawrence M. Stratton dramatically expose how our present system has
deteriorated. In a corresponding article to their book Roberts writes:
For centuries prosecutorial behavior was restrained by conscience and by
the carefully inculcated ethic that the prosecutor’s duty is to serve justice
by finding truth. The purpose of a trial was to weigh the evidence for and
against the defendant, not to convict him at any cost. A prosecutor’s career
and self-esteem did not depend on his conviction rate and the number of
people he put behind bars, but, as Supreme Court Justices Robert Jackson and
George Sutherland put it, on seeing that justice was done. A prosecutor who
suborned perjury or withheld exculpatory evidence in order to win a case was
seen as a shameful figure. [1]
Sadly this is no longer the case in America. “Crowded court dockets,
bureaucracy, budgetary pressures, and careerism,” says Roberts, have
“contributed to elevating ambition over justice.” [2] Robert Merkle,
Former U.S. Attorney in the Reagan administration, puts it quite frankly:
Prosecution is “a result-oriented process today, fairness be damned.”
Prosecutors, he tells us, are pressured to justify budgets with convictions,
“and that causes them to prosecute absolutely bogus cases to get those
statistics.” [3]
The fundamental principles of legal fairness and justice are cynically
ignored by almost every prosecutor in the system today in a frenzied chase
after gold stars for their performance boards – i.e., more convictions at
any cost.
“Withholding exculpatory evidence has become routine,” states Roberts,
“and suborned perjury is often the only ‘evidence’ in a case.” He continues:
Juries are unaware that in many cases the witness giving incriminating
testimony is not only rehearsed in the role but also paid by the prosecutor
with money or reduced prison time. In 1998 the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
summed up its investigative reports of prosecutorial misconduct: “Hundreds of
times during the past 10 years, federal agents and prosecutors have pursued
justice by breaking the law. They lied, hid evidence, distorted facts,
engaged in cover-ups, paid for perjury and set up innocent people in a
relentless effort to win indictments, guilty pleas and convictions. Rarely
were these federal officials punished for their misconduct.…Perjury has become
the coin of the realm in federal law enforcement. People’s homes are invaded
because of lies. People are arrested because of lies. People go to prison
because of lies. People stay in prison because of lies and bad guys go free
because of lies.” [4]
Answer to the Denials
Establishment defenders of the system are quick to deny validity to these
claims. But the axe they are grinding clearly clouds their interpretations.
In the past five decades, the number of cases surfacing of FBI and
prosecutorial misconduct in which gross miscarriages of justice have taken
place are legion. The FBI siege of Randy Weaver in Idaho, the Waco, Texas
Siege, the Randall Dale Adams murder case in Dallas, the Clarence Chance and
Benny Powell murder convictions in Los Angeles, the McMartin Pre-School
molestation fiasco in Manhattan Beach, California, and others like them are
just the tip of a monstrous iceberg.
Why we know it is an iceberg is because appellate court decisions rule
only on those police and prosecutorial corruption cases that
surface; and then publish only 10% of such surfaced cases. The rest never
appear in any official legal books; they are merely sent to the litigants and
are not widely known. Thus thousands of surfaced cases of misconduct and
corruption go undetected by the public. But the real monstrosity of this
problem is the tens of thousands (maybe hundreds of thousands) of cases that
never surface – i.e., all the perjuries, intimidations, suppressions, and
frame-ups that government agents successfully pull off without detection.
They remain totally below the water line.
Teaching Moral Relativism
Herein lies the downfall of America’s system of ordered freedom. Judges,
prosecutors, and attorneys are moved by their ideological premises. If we
teach MORAL RELATIVISM in the schools to flawed human beings (which we have
been doing since the 1920s), it will not be just our arts and sexual habits
that self-destruct. It will be our entire legal and political structures as
well.
Where there once were numerous Frank Serpicos pursuing bad guys and great
legal eagles seeking truth for all, we now have swarms of petty, unscrupulous
“ladder climbers” impervious to principle and obsessed with ruthless
careerism. We now have a morass of prosecutorial fanaticism and power-crazed judges
concerned only with maintaining their social status amidst cushy connections
and the material pleasures of life in the fast lane.
This corruption has taken over all court systems – local, state and
federal. Most heinous and dangerous, however, is its cancerous development in
the federal DOJ. We now have a DOJ and FBI that have become seriously
degraded because they are frantically defending the Deep State’s control over
American life. This is not just what Obama gave us; it is what George Bush,
Bill Clinton, and George H.W. Bush gave us. What we have are the initial
stages of a police state. Powerful political partisans have corrupted the FBI
to be used as the gestapo arm of the DOJ. This is what President Trump
confronts as he tries to drain the swamp.
Criminalizing Trump
Enter the Russian-Trump collusion probe headed by Robert Mueller. The Deep
State’s DOJ is moving via the Obama worm, Rod Rosenstein, to destroy
President Trump by criminalizing his election if possible, and if not
possible, criminalizing Trump himself via manufactured “obstruction of
justice” charges.
In the Book of Revelation, the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse are War,
Famine, Pestilence, and Death. In today’s Washington the “Four Horsemen of
Anti-Justice” are Robert Mueller, Rod Rosenstein, Andrew Weissmann, and Peter
Strzok.
These four Washington power players represent the legal henchmen of the
Deep State. They have built their careers feeding off a centralized
government that has stultified freedom and brought America under the total
control of Washington. They may not be the official ideologists of big
government collectivism (our professors in the universities play that role);
but the Mueller Gang members are the creatures that slither out from under
the rocks to rise to elite status whenever tyrannical government overreach
occurs. They thrive on the necessary deceit, intimidation and sophistries
that sustain statist despotism. Their kind has been around for thousands of
years, always feeding on amorality and ruthless governmentalism.
* * * *
Robert
Mueller is the leader of the coup d’etat now trying to defend the Deep
State’s control over American politics from Donald Trump’s assault on its
tyrannical vision. In the process Mueller also hopes to atone for the firing
of his friend, James Comey. Unfortunately many conservatives cannot see that
this man is not a “pillar of impartiality” as the media paint him. He is
deeply committed to statist corruption.
Rod
Rosenstein is the Deputy Attorney General appointed by Obama and
inexplicably left over to serve in Trump’s administration. This, of course,
is why he was so insistent on appointing Robert Mueller as a Special Counsel
to investigate Trump for alleged collusion with the Russians. His agenda is
preservation of the Deep State as is Mueller’s. He would have been much
happier if Hillary had won. In fact he was surely expecting it.
Andrew
Weissmann is the primary hatchet man of the Mueller team assembled to
investigate Russian collusion. He is a notorious pit bull prosecutor with a
record of suppressing exculpatory evidence in overreaching prosecutions that
have been overturned by higher courts. He was an ardent Obama supporter.
Known widely for bare knuckle tactics in flipping underlings to force
testimony against the major target.
Peter
Strzok was the leading FBI agent brought in by Mueller because of his
experience in counterintelligence cases. An eager Clinton supporter and one
of the agents who interviewed Hillary about the email scandal, which turned
out to be a powder-puff interview. He also edited Comey’s Clinton
investigation resolution by replacing the words “grossly negligent” with
“extremely careless” because the former action can be prosecuted in the
handling of classified information while the latter cannot.
* * * *
Is this, as the media claims, an objective team of investigators committed
to ferreting out the truth? Hardly. This is a coup d’etat to delegitimize the
election of Donald Trump and find a means to impeach him, which Mueller and
his cronies hope will discredit the “people’s revolution” against the Deep
State that Trump has fashioned.
This horrendous nightmare is taking place because of the collectivist
corruption of the DOJ and the FBI under Obama, Clinton and the two Bushes.
Corruption in practice takes place in men’s institutions only after
corruption of ethics and ideology takes place in their minds. Moral
relativism (along with political collectivism) took over the minds of our
professors, politicians and prosecutors in the aftermath of World War II and
exploded throughout our culture from the 1960s to today. The chickens are now
coming home to roost and usher in an authoritarian society.
To thwart this coup d’etat, we must hope that there are no activities in
Trump’s
background that Mueller can spin into “collusion” or “obstruction.” We must
also hope that conservatives in Congress will show some backbone and
counterattack against Hillary with an investigation of the egregious Uranium
One deal in which she authorized the sale of 20% of America’s uranium to
Russia, which brought tens of millions of dollars into the Clinton Foundation
from Russian sources. The fingerprints of Mueller, Weissmann and Rosenstein
are also on the Uranium One deal, for they worked assiduously to facilitate
and protect its completion, knowing full well but not caring that it
compromised American security. [5] Why? Because their stalwart political
horse, Hillary Clinton, was benefiting. Thus the Deep State’s aggrandizement
was benefiting.
In addition to Mueller’s connection to Uranium One it now looks like the
FBI, under the guidance of Mueller and Comey, also helped pay for the Fusion
GPS fake dossier on Trump. See: https://americauncensored.com/traitors-fbi-paid-take-trump/
This is outrageous. The Mueller Probe corruption is something we would
expect to find in an Idi Amin regime in Africa, or one of the old Soviet
Union Show Trials under Stalin in 1936. It is a contemptible “witch hunt”
that is the result of obsessively partisan FBI leaders that have let their
ideology and hatred influence their role as policemen.
What Looms Now in the Unfolding of this Investigation
What I fear now taking place is that the Mueller-Weissmann team, by
holding a prison term over the heads of Flynn and Manafort, will
induce them to “cooperate”, i.e., perjure themselves and claim that
Trump urged them to solicit Russian help in the 2016 election. This is
the way Weissmann operates (along with many other high powered prosecutors
throughout the country). Of course, they won’t ask Flynn and Manafort to
testify falsely. They’ll just say to them:
“Think back in your recollections over the last two years. Surely you can
remember an instance when Trump urged you to solicit a Russian official to
help him in the election. We need you to cooperate with us, and then we can
drop the lying and tax evasion charges that hang over you. There’s no need
for you to go to prison. Just think back in your recollections; we’re sure
you can remember some instance in which Trump urged you to approach the
Russians.”
What do you think Flynn and Manafort are going to do if this is what is
presented to them? Will their lawyers stand strong and object if both Flynn
and Manafort “suddenly do recollect” what Mueller-Weissmann are suggesting?
Doubtful. All attorneys want to win cases. They want to get a good deal for
their clients. They probably will let Flynn and Manafort make up their own
mind whether to cooperate with the prosecution in the way it is suggesting.
The prosecutors will not care that (under GIGLIO v. United States) they
have to divulge to the jury that Flynn and Manafort were promised a dropping
of charges in return for their testimony. They will simply say to the jury
that “Michael Flynn and Paul Manafort have agreed to cooperate in the
interests of truth.” The word “perjure” is never mentioned in any discussions
that Mueller-Weissmann have with Flynn and Manafort and their attorneys. The
whole process is veiled in innocent language, but the message gets through clearly
to both Flynn and Manafort that they need to “recollect better” and
“cooperate” with the prosecution.
It will take an extremely strong patriot lawyer to try and talk Flynn and
Manafort out of “cooperating.” Maybe they have such lawyers, but the odds are
against it. Almost all attorneys today are corrupt also and merely go along
with the prosecution’s game of defendant intimidation. Most attorneys urge
their clients to plead out and “cooperate” to stay out of prison. In other
words, they do not advise their clients truthfully or properly. It’s all part
of the rigged game that comprises our Justice System. Attorneys are just as
greedy and amoral as the prosecutors. Both of them subconsciously work
together to feather their own nests, attorneys for more money, and
prosecutors for more gold stars.
It should be noted here that prosecutors are also ultimately motivated by
monetary rewards. If they can build up enough “gold stars”, i.e., convictions
while acting as a prosecutor or U.S. Attorney, they can then, 8-10 years down
the road, go into private practice and command a million dollar annual salary
with any number of powerful and influential law firms. This is especially so
in all the metropolitan areas, New York, Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, San
Francisco, etc.
Mueller and Weissmann are nefariously corrupt wolves. This kind of
venality is what Weissmann has partaken in numerous times in the past, and of
course why Mueller chose him to head up the team. He’s an unscrupulous pit
bull devoid of conscience.
Conclusion
What’s so exasperating is that naïve conservatives (the latest being the
buffoon Karl Rove) continue to parrot the line about Mueller being such a
high-minded man of integrity. Lenin had a name for people like Rove – “useful
idiots.” Any hard-eyed observer living in reality can see that Mueller is no
different than Weissmann persona-wise. He is the quintessential tyrannical
bureaucrat – treacherous, unctuous, and ruthless. He is just a velvet glove,
instead of an iron fist, authoritarian. But he is still a traitor to the
American cause, the American principles, the Constitution, and the cause of
freedom.
Rising star in the GOP, Matt Gaetz has put forth a congressional
resolution for Mueller to resign in face of the undeniable bias and corruption
of his probe to date, but don’t expect such a resignation to ever take place.
Mueller will press on because he is not after truth; he is after the venting
of his hatred of Trump. He and Weissman will wield their terrible powers, and
unfortunately both Michael Flynn and Paul Manafort look like they may be the
tools of such wielding via forced “cooperation”, i.e., perjury.
The only thing that can avert this unfolding is that Trump convinces Jeff
Sessions to resign, and then dismisses Deputy AG, Rod Rosenstein, and brings
in someone with some patriotic teeth who would move to rein in Mueller. This
would allow Trump to not be cast in Nixon’s shadow when he fired the Special
Prosecutor, Archibald Cox, back in 1973, which then unleashed a firestorm.
They’re are no good options in this fiasco. The die was cast when Rosenstein
was allowed to appoint Mueller. Why Trump ever allowed Rosenstein to remain
as Deputy AG in his administration is mystifying. Rosenstein was an Obama
appointee, clearly an enemy. And Trump had every right to dismiss him right
away upon inauguration. I’m guessing that allowing Rosenstein was due to
Reince Priebus, the ultimate RINO compromiser with the left and crypto
defender of the Deep State. One more example of how difficult a job Trump has
in front of him.
1. Paul Craig Roberts, “From Blackstone to Bentham: Why Wrongful
Conviction Is On the Rise,” LewRockwell.com, March 31, 2001.
2. Ibid, p. 5.
3. Ibid, pp. 5-6.
4. Ibid, p. 6.
5. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/452972/...plicit-not-just
