Fermer X Les cookies sont necessaires au bon fonctionnement de 24hGold.com. En poursuivant votre navigation sur notre site, vous acceptez leur utilisation.
Pour en savoir plus sur les cookies...
AnglaisFrancais
Cours Or & Argent en

The Literal Poison of Democratic Socialism

IMG Auteur
lewRockwell
Publié le 08 août 2016
811 mots - Temps de lecture : 2 - 3 minutes
( 4 votes, 3/5 ) , 2 commentaires
Imprimer l'article
  Article Commentaires Commenter Notation Tous les Articles  
0
envoyer
2
commenter
Notre Newsletter...
Rubrique : Editoriaux

Latin America is once again demonstrating the social poison of “democratic socialism,” the ideology that won Bernie Sanders more than 13 million votes in the Democratic primaries.  Socialism – democratic or otherwise – is not only destructive of a nation’s economy, as history proved over and over again during the twentieth century; it is also ecological poison.  After the worldwide collapse of socialism in the late 1980s/early 1990s, we got a first look at what a country’s environment under a socialist system that banned private profit-making for decades looked like.  In a word, it was a catastrophe, as described in books with titles like “Ecocide in the U.S.S. R.”

The world learned that the socialist countries dumped untreated sewage into their rivers, streams, and lakes for decades; the Volga River in Russia was so polluted that boat were equipped with signs warning against throwing cigarettes in the water for fear the chemical-laden water would catch fire; factories had no pollution controls whatsoever; massive fish kills were routine; and the Polish Academy of Sciences reported that by the early 1990s one-third of the Polish people lived in areas of “ecological disaster.”

The old theory that the pursuit of profit in an unregulated economy is the root cause of pollution was shattered.  Unlike capitalist countries that hold polluters legally responsible for the damage they cause to others, in socialist countries politicians who are responsible for polluting nationalized industries bear little or no responsibility for it.  Government ownership of natural resources means, in effect, no one owns them, and when resources are all one big commons they are inevitably overused, abused, and exploited.  The absence of property rights and a sound liability law system is a recipe for ecological disaster, as all socialist countries have proven and continue to prove.

When a horrible accident created a deadly oil platform explosion in the Gulf of Mexico, privately-owned British Petroleum immediately created a $20 billion fund that it knew it would need for payment of damages.  In contrast, when the Mexican government creates far worse environmental and human disasters in the Gulf of Mexico it routinely does nothing by claiming “sovereign immunity.”  In the first five months of 2015 alone Pemex, the Mexican nationalized oil company, caused three catastrophic oil rig explosions that resulted in several deaths, numerous injuries to platform workers, and air and water pollution.  The Mexican government incredibly claimed that there were no oil spills, which was quickly proven to be a lie by satellite images of a three-mile-long oil slick provided by Greenpeace Mexico.

Television coverage of the Summer Olympics in Brazil is about to showcase the horrific pollution problems in that country, which has been ruled for many years by the “democratic socialist” Workers Party, which proudly proclaims “revolutionary socialism” to be its defining ideology.  In addition to creating some of the worst poverty in the world, the Brazilian government has turned that country’s once-beautiful beaches into stinking cesspools.

An August 2 article in the Daily Mail by Gareth Davies reported on a study of pollution in Rio de Janeiro on the eve of the Olympics which found the following:

  • Athletes have been told not to put their heads under water.
  • Viral levels in Guanabara Bay, where the triathlon will take place, are 1.7 million times higher than health-hazard levels in the U.S. and Europe.
  • Rubbish in some of the bays is so thick that you cannot see the water and rats live on top of the floating rubbish.
  • A floating corpse and a severed arm were recently spotted floating in Guanabara Bay.
  • There are extremely high levels of viruses in the sand on the beaches.
  • The virus level in Gloria Marina, where the sailing races will begin, are several thousand times higher than danger levels in the U.S.
  • “Black tongues of fetid, sewage-filled water” are “common” on “tony” Ipanema Beach.
  • Vast islands of sewage sludge are seen at low tide, dumped there by residential high-rise apartment buildings.
  • Many rivers are “tar black” from pollution.

Such ecological nightmares have become common in other Latin American “showcases” of “democratic” socialism.  Venezuela suffers from massive deforestation and its Lake Maracaibo is heavily polluted with 10,000 gallons of sewage per second dumped into it from the two million residences that surround the lake.  More than 800 companies, mostly related to the government’s nationalized oil industry, are permitted to dump industrial waste into the lake.  Massive Lake Valencia is also said to be “massively polluted,” and the government-run oil company, PDVSA, has reportedly filled more than 15,000 oil pits with contaminated sludge from oil wells that will inevitably seep into the ground water.

One lesson that all the Bernie Sanders-following millennials need to learn is that “democratic” socialism can not only destroy their economic future; it can also inflict irreparable harm on their natural environment.  Socialism is always and everywhere an economic and environmental disaster.

 

Données et statistiques pour les pays mentionnés : Venezuela | Tous
Cours de l'or et de l'argent pour les pays mentionnés : Venezuela | Tous
<< Article précedent
Evaluer : Note moyenne :3 (4 votes)
>> Article suivant
Publication de commentaires terminée
  Tous Favoris Mieux Notés  
To lump Soviet, Venezuelan, Brazilian and American "socialism" into a single group is perhaps a little to broad. They are quite different in their origins and in their practices. Socialism was a social movement in response to feudalism, monarchy, theocracy and a number of other very complex and different social structures. Capitalism is an economic system. Socialism is not. We know this because capitalism can operate in most social structures, whereas socialism IS the social structure.

Your comparison is misplaced. A more meaningful comparison would be between American capitalism and Soviet communism and their respective effects on the environment. However, your example of BP (whose actions you seem to approve of) is quite anti-capitalist in most respects and is more likely the result of socialism (social pressure) - BP was concerned primarily with their image rather than their stock price. Conversely, Mexican immunity is the result of capitalism without socialism.

Democratic socialism is thus one means of using social pressure to restrain naturally occurring excesses in the economic system.
Evaluer :   2  1Note :   1
EmailPermalink
"...Conversely, Mexican immunity is the result of capitalism without socialism. "

The State owns the means of production, and Capitalism and immunity..sovereign that is, are oxymoronic.
Dernier commentaire publié pour cet article
"...Conversely, Mexican immunity is the result of capitalism without socialism. " The State owns the means of production, and Capitalism and immunity..sovereign that is, are oxymoronic. Lire la suite
Falconflight - 06/09/2016 à 05:24 GMT
Top articles
Derniers Commentaires
Nos politiciens sont des criminels
03 avr.Louis L.
"Incompétence" ? Voire ! Se développe de plus en plus ouvertement, avant censure, une thèse selon laquelle ce fléau est délibéré. C'est fou...
Le terrible drame espagnol… Partagez, informez, faites suivre.
01 avr.Louis L.
20 ans de rigueur,.............. pas pour la pléthorique fonction publique, sans oublier ses retraités avec 75% du dernier salaire c'est à dire , ...
Non, la France n’est pas en guerre! Slobodan Despot
27 marsLouis L.
Il serait aussitôt banni .
Non, la France n’est pas en guerre! Slobodan Despot
25 marsSebastien H2
Bravo, cet article est extraordinaire; il se situe au-dessus de la mêlée! Quel courage pour oser écrire un tel papier "contrarien". Aucun journaleu...
Confinement : forcément, ça va bien se passer
24 marsdilapidor
Le gouvernement a quand même été efficace sur un point. Augmentation de l'indemnité de logement de 33% pour les députés. Dépenses de cabinets entre...
L’effondrement et la sidération
21 marsblitzel1
Le "bobo à trottinette", tout juste; c'était déjà grave de voir celà (à pile en plus). Vendredi 13 le Jour où tout a commencé, le jour de ...
L’effondrement et la sidération
21 marsClepsidre1
Jamais le moment n'a été aussi fort où l'on doit prendre conscience que la seule richesse que l'on possède est l'instant présent ; et surtout ensem...
Pourquoi payer des impôts quand il leur suffit d’imprimer de l’arge...
21 marsClepsidre
Sans aller jusqu'au possible utopique de cette solution qui ne sera pas du tout viable à long terme, il est en effet possible en certaines très gra...
Articles les plus commentésFavorisPlus...
Flux d'Actualités
TOUS
OR
ARGENT
PGM & DIAMANTS
PÉTROLE & GAZ
AUTRES MÉTAUX