SUITE 860
- 625
HOWE STREET ?
VANCOUVER, BC ?
V6C 2T6 CANADA ? TEL:
(604) 687-7545 FAX: (604) 689-5041
PRESS
RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE
RELEASE
December 12, 2007
#07-36
Sherwood Reports Results of Pre-feasibility Study for
Expansion of Minto Copper-Gold
Mine
Increased Copper and Gold Production Supported by Study,
Commencing Immediately
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA -
Sherwood Copper Corporation (SWC: TSX-V)
today announced results of an independent pre-feasibility study for the expansion of the Minto
copper-gold mine in the Yukon.
This study increases reserves and lays out a path for significantly
increased copper production,
commencing immediately, and enhanced project
economics.
?The completion of a pre-feasibility study that incorporates the Area 2
deposit, which was discovered and defined in 2006, represents another significant milestone in Sherwood?s
relentless pursuit of value,? said Stephen Quin, President & CEO. ?We have taken an exploration concept
and, within 20 months, converted it into a reserve that supports a 45% increase
in mill throughput and a 43% increase in total project copper and gold production with increased copper and gold
production commencing
immediately. Given the very
encouraging exploration in 2007, there would appear to be excellent
opportunities for further resource additions that could potentially support
additional production expansions or
an increased mine life.?
Highlights
The Pre-feasibility Study technical report
(?PFS?) lays out the basis for production from the Area 2 deposit at a higher mill
throughput than was defined in the 2006 detailed feasibility study completed by
Hatch Ltd. (?DFS?), the results of which were announced on August 28, 2006. The PFS also incorporates a number of
additional post-DFS optimizations. Highlights of the PFS, as compared to the
DFS include the following:
v
Processing increased to 3,500 tpd from 2,400
tpd;
v
Higher metal production commences in 2008 as a result of processing higher grades
first;
v
43% increase in total copper and gold
produced in
concentrates;
v
39% increase in pre-tax net present value at
a 7.5% discount rate, 75% after
tax;
v
41% pre-tax IRR, 35% after tax based on
$2/lb copper price plus completed forward
sales;
v
52% pre-tax IRR, 46% after tax based on forward copper
price plus completed forward
sales.
The PFS represents an interim update on the Minto Project with
resource estimates as of the end of 2006 and costs as of the end of 2007. However, continued exploration success
in 2007, which could result in further reserve increases beyond those outlined
in the PFS, and other optimization opportunities, suggest that additional value
remains to be extracted from the Minto Project and Sherwood will continue to
pursue the crystallization of these value
opportunities.
Basis of Pre-feasibility
Study
In 2006, Sherwood identified and
defined a promising deposit, Area 2,
located immediately south of the Minto Main pit and drilled it to NI43-101
resource standards in 2006 with 79 holes totalling 18,134 m of diamond drilling,
resulting in approximately the same
drill spacing as the Minto Main deposit.
The Area 2 mineral resource was sufficiently promising to commission the independent PFS completed
under the supervision of SRK Consulting (Canada)
Ltd. (?SRK?). In addition to
looking at the economic potential of the Area 2 deposit, the study was expanded
to incorporate several other concurrent Minto Project improvements that were identified post-DFS,
including:
v
Implementation of coarser initial grinding
in conjunction with a regrind of rougher cell
concentrates;
v
Increase in mill capacity to 3,500 tonnes
per day;
v
Rescheduling of open pit to maximize
up-front grades;
v
Utilization of grid electrical
power;
v
Review of waste rock and tailings deposition
options;
v
Optimization of the pit slopes for the Main
pit based on new geotechnical data and
analysis;
v
Improved recoveries for partially oxidized
material.
It is envisioned that, based on
the results of this study, Minto Explorations (?MintoEx?) will seek amendments
to its current operating permits from the Yukon government in order to increase
production and modify operating
parameters to accommodate these and other proposed operational improvements.
Mineral
Resources
Lions Gate Geological Consulting
Inc. (?LGGC?), in conjunction with SRK, conducted the mineral resource estimate
for the Area 2 deposit. LGGC and
SRK have reviewed pertinent geological information in sufficient detail to
support the data incorporated into the resource estimate. SRK was actively involved during the
estimation process, provided guidance with geostatistical analyses of
copper and gold, estimation parameters to be used, and validated the copper and
gold block models. The
previously disclosed mineral
resources for the main Minto and Area 2 deposits (as of March 2007) are
summarized below and are detailed in the table attached (see news releases dated
February 26, 2007 and July 10, 2006 for additional
details).
Minto Project Mineral Resource Estimate Including Reserves (@ 0.5 %Cu cut-off)
Class |
Tonnes |
In situ Grade |
Contained
Metal |
(% Cu) |
(g/t Au) |
(g/t Ag) |
Cu (Mlb) |
Au (oz) |
Ag (oz) |
Measured |
10,638,000 |
1.84 |
0.68 |
7.20 |
432 |
231,000 |
2,462,000 |
Indicated |
6,018,000 |
1.01 |
0.34 |
3.75 |
135 |
66,700 |
725,000
|
M+I |
16,656,000 |
1.54 |
0.56 |
5.95 |
567 |
297,600 |
3,185,000 |
Inferred |
1,471,400 |
1.00 |
0.32 |
2.05 |
33 |
15,600 |
97,000 |
Mineral
Reserves
The Area 2 deposit is proposed to be developed as
an open pit following the depletion of the current Main pit. Similar to the 2006 DFS for the Main
deposit, the Main/Area 2 combined mine plan focuses on accessing and milling the
high-grade ore first, with lower grade material sent to stockpiles for blending
and processing later in the mine life.
Mine design for both pits was initiated with the
development of a Net Smelter Return (?NSR?) model. The model included estimates of: metal
prices, exchange rate, mining dilution, mill recovery, concentrate grade smelting and refining payables and costs, freight and marketing costs and
royalties. The NSR model was based
on a 15m x 15m x 3m block size for the Area 2 and Main Pit combined. The NSR block model was then used with
the MineSight Lerchs-Grossman algorithm to determine the optimal mining
shell. Detailed mine planning and
scheduling was then conducted on the optimal pit shell and a mineral reserve was
estimated as summarized below and detailed in the table
attached.
Minto Project Mineral Reserves (@ 0.62 %Cu
cut-off)
Class |
Tonnes |
In situ Grade |
Contained
Metal |
(% Cu) |
(g/t Au) |
(g/t Ag) |
Cu (Mlb) |
Au (oz) |
Ag (oz) |
Proven |
8,552,000 |
1.97 |
0.72 |
7.80 |
371.4 |
197,200 |
2,145,000 |
Probable |
902,000 |
1.22 |
0.46 |
5.06 |
24.3 |
13,400 |
147,000 |
Total |
9,454,000 |
1.90 |
0.69 |
7.54 |
395.6 |
210,600 |
2,292,000 |
Mine Plan
During 2007, MintoEx began a process of post-DFS optimization of
its mine plan, resulting in accelerated production for the Main pit. The accelerated PFS mine plan was
implemented at the Minto mine during the latter part of 2007, and will continue
into 2008. The post-2008 mining
sequence was then divided into four phases. The first phase sees the completion
of mining in the Main pit in approximately 2010 followed by three phases in Area 2
and is based upon providing the
required ore per period with maximum grade while deferring stripping as long as
possible. The Main and Area 2 pits will be mined sequentially, with the
stripping of the Area 2 pit beginning after the completion of mining in the Main
pit. Area 2 waste is then used to
fill the Main pit. Mill feed will
come from stockpiled main pit ore during the Area 2 stripping phase. The entire project has a life-of-mine production duration of eight years, with one
additional year required for the mill to process the remaining stockpiles ? a total of nine
producing years. The life-of-mine
production schedule is shown in the table below.
Minto
Project Life-of-Mine Production Schedule
|
|
Year |
|
Units |
2007* |
2008* |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
Total |
Parameter |
Main Pit |
Area 2 Pit |
Ore
mined |
Mt |
0.9 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
3.0 |
0.2 |
1.7 |
0.1 |
1.3 |
9.5 |
Waste mined |
Mt |
6.6 |
10.2 |
8.2 |
5.5 |
5.6 |
10.8 |
12.2 |
4.7 |
63.8 |
Strip ratio |
Waste:Ore |
7.58 |
9.67 |
7.16 |
1.82 |
22.26 |
6.50 |
93.72 |
3.61 |
6.74 |
Cu grade |
% Cu |
2.01% |
2.50% |
1.79% |
2.09% |
2.07% |
1.53% |
0.97% |
1.51% |
1.90% |
Au grade |
Au g/t |
0.61 |
1.01 |
0.49 |
0.79 |
0.99 |
0.61 |
0.35 |
0.59 |
0.70 |
Ag grade |
Ag g/t |
8.00 |
10.33 |
7.23 |
8.81 |
9.58 |
5.53 |
3.34 |
4.85 |
7.53 |
* from Main Pit Budget
(May 07 - Dec 08) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since the date of this production schedule, additional
work has been undertaken to smooth out the production schedule and further
optimize metal production; this work will be an on-going process as additional
information is incorporated from 2007 drilling and subsequent
activities.
Processing
The Minto concentrator initiated
production in May 2007 with a design
daily production rate of 1,563
tpd. A Phase 2 expansion of the
Minto concentrator to 2,400 tpd was engineered and approved for construction at a capital cost of $15.8
million and is expected to be complete at the end of 2007 and commissioned in
January 2008. Based on extensive metallurgical
testing previously reported (see news
release dated June 12, 2007) and additional testing subsequent to that, a Phase
3 mill expansion to 3,500 tpd has been designed incorporating the benefits of
grinding coarser and various other process optimizations demonstrated in bench test work
completed post-DFS. One of these
post-DFS optimizations may include the installation of a gravity gold recovery
plant in the grinding circuit in order to recover any free gold that may be
present, however no benefit from this
optimization has been assumed in the PFS since the benefits of this will have to
be demonstrated through production.
Production
The following sets out the copper, gold and silver in
concentrates and estimated payable metal detailed in the
PFS.
Minto Project Life-of-Mine Metal Production
Forecast
|
|
Year |
|
|
Item |
Unit |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
Total/Ave. |
|
Copper in cons |
lb ('000) |
10,421 |
59,428 |
53,679 |
84,664 |
44,050 |
46,161 |
24,363 |
39,222 |
9,280 |
371,268 |
Gold in cons |
oz (?000) |
2.4 |
25.5 |
19.6 |
36.7 |
21.8 |
20.7 |
9.0 |
15.5 |
2.7 |
154 |
Silver in cons |
oz (?000) |
57.5 |
336.8 |
317.9 |
523.5 |
241.1 |
230.1 |
121.7 |
164.6 |
42.3 |
2,035 |
Conc. Grade |
% Cu |
33% |
35% |
43% |
43% |
43% |
41% |
43% |
41% |
41% |
41% |
Payable copper |
lb ('000) |
9,974 |
57,155 |
51,778 |
81,666 |
42,491 |
44,527 |
23,501 |
37,833 |
8,951 |
357,877 |
Payable gold |
oz Au (?000) |
2.29 |
24.5 |
18.7 |
35.5 |
21.1 |
20.0 |
8.7 |
15.0 |
2.6 |
148 |
Payable silver |
oz Ag (?000) |
43.55 |
262.1 |
262.4 |
436.1 |
195.5 |
180.7 |
96.4 |
122.4 |
32.3 |
1,631 |
As
noted above, additional smoothing of production is planned post-PFS as part of
an on-going process of open pit
optimization.
Metal Pricing
In the PFS, un-hedged pricing was maintained at the DFS assumptions of
$2.00 US/lb copper, $550 US/oz gold and $9.00 US/oz silver (the ?Base
Case?). Discussions related to the
appropriateness of this price, in consideration of current copper
pricing and the debate surrounding
pricing of copper futures, were
limited and satisfied by the opportunity to modify and report these effects
during the financial sensitivity analysis.
Hedging of metals and prices
were applied for periods 2007 to 2011 based on forward sales contracts in place
as of Sept 25, 2007. These metal
hedging gains were included in the project cash flow and represented undiscounted revenue of $0.18 US/lb of
copper.
Summary of Metal Price
Hedging
Metal |
Units |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
Total |
Copper |
(US$/lb) |
$3.08 |
$2.88 |
$2.49 |
$2.19 |
$2.12 |
$2.50 |
Gold |
(US$/oz) |
$648.00 |
$654.00 |
$653.00 |
$653.00 |
$720.00 |
$667.46 |
Silver |
(US$/oz) |
$11.76 |
$11.90 |
$11.90 |
$11.90 |
$13.68 |
$12.26 |
In the Base Case, the foreign exchange rate was defined
by MintoEx as being 1.13 C$:US$ and did not include any allowance for exchange
rate risks that might be incurred in future years of the project ? the value of 1.13 C$:US$ was maintained for
the life of the project, as were the
flat metal price assumptions noted
above. A scenario involving the
current forward curve for copper, spot prices for gold and silver and parity for the US$ was
evaluated (the ?Forward Case?).
Economics
The PFS costs were based on, in order of
preference, actual contract costs, Minto 2007 and 2008 budget estimates and the
2006 DFS estimates. The principal
differences between the 2006 DFS, 2007 PFS are set out in the table below, which
illustrates both the Base Case and Forward Case.
Comparison of
2006 DFS and PFS (Base Case & Forward Case)
|
|
August 2006 Feasibility
Study
(Main Deposit
Only) |
Pre-feasibility
Study
(Main & Area 2
Deposits) ? Base Case |
Pre-feasibility
Study
(Main & Area 2 Deposits) ? Forward
Case |
Item |
Unit |
Waste mined |
Millions t |
40.0 |
63.8 |
63.8 |
Ore
mined |
Millions t |
5.9 |
9.5 |
9.5 |
Copper mill head
grade |
% Cu |
2.20% |
1.90% |
1.90% |
Gold mill head
grade |
g/t Au |
0.80 |
0.70 |
0.70 |
Silver mill head
grade |
g/t Ag |
9.13 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
Copper in cons |
Millions lb |
259 |
371 |
371 |
Gold in cons |
000?s oz |
108 |
154 |
154 |
Silver in cons |
000?s oz |
1,470 |
2,035 |
2,035 |
Concentrate Grade |
% Cu |
36% |
41% |
41% |
Copper Price (including
hedging) |
US$/lb |
$2.00 |
$
2.16 |
$
2.75 |
Gold price (including
hedging) |
US$/oz |
$550.00 |
$ 592.12 |
$
753.32 |
Silver price (including
hedging) |
US$/oz |
$9.00 |
$ 10.18 |
$
13.71 |
Exchange rate |
US$/C$ |
$0.839 |
$ 0.885 |
$
1.000 |
NSR |
C$/t milled |
$101.94 |
$ 88.84 |
$
103 |
Unit Total OPEX (inc
royalties) |
C$/t milled |
$45.45 |
$ 47.18 |
$
47.12 |
Unit operating costs after by-product
credits |
US$/lb Cu |
$0.73 |
$
0.81 |
$
0.87 |
Total Capital (initial and
sustaining) |
$M |
$108 |
$
151 |
$
151 |
NPV7.5%
pre-tax |
$M |
$127 |
$
177 |
$
275 |
NPV7.5% after
tax |
$M |
$72 |
$ 126 |
$
210 |
IRR pre-tax |
% |
37% |
41 % |
52 % |
IRR after tax |
% |
27% |
35 % |
46
% |
As
noted above, the DFS used flat metal prices throughout the life of the study, whereas the
PFS Base Case uses the same metal prices (US$2.00/lb Cu, US$550/oz Au and US$9.00/oz
Ag) for unhedged production but
actual forward contract pricing for
the metal forward sold. The Forward
Case uses a conservative forward case of the current forward copper
prices (which decline over time due
to backwardation) but the current spot prices for gold and silver (without the benefit of
the contango in these commodities) for unhedged production, actual forward contract pricing for the metal forward sold, and a US$ at
parity with the Canadian dollar.
Exploration
The 2007 exploration
drilling focused mostly on nine separate exploration target areas in addition to
a small program dedicated to
geotechnical/metallurgical drilling at the Main
and Area 2 deposits as part of the PFS.
One hundred and two exploration and geotechnical drill holes were completed for 23,618 metres, including ten holes drilled for geotechnical and
metallurgical purposes; five in the Main pit and five at the Area 2
deposit. Significant new
copper-gold mineralization was discovered at Gap, Copper Keel South and Airstrip
SW, while Area 118 was expanded from a localized historic drill occurrence to
what MintoEx now believes may be the discovery of a significant new
deposit. Assays are still pending
on 34 drill holes. The remainder of the 2007 drill
results will be reported over the next month or so, as they become available,
and this information will be used to complete new NI 43-101 compliant mineral
resource estimates and lay out the priorities for a significant 2008 exploration
program to follow up on the exciting
2007 discoveries. Only geotechnical
and metallurgical technical results were incorporated into the PFS; none of the
2007 drill assay results are incorporated into the PFS. Final 2007 drill assay
results will be incorporated into new resource calculations to be completed by
the end of Q1 2008.
Grid Power
Connection
The PFS assumes that grid power will be established on
site at the end of 2008. A
preliminary Power Purchase Agreement
(?PPA?) was entered into and subsequently amended, as announced by MintoEx
February 12, 2007 and May 30, 2007.
The rates for electrical power supply were set out in the PPA and are
expected to provide power at an
estimated $0.10 per KWh, a significant saving over the current cost of on site
diesel generation. As noted in a
news release dated December 7, 2007, MintoEx has interest only payments for
three years after completion of the grid connection, and principal and interest payments for four years
thereafter on the main line, while the spur line has principal and interest payments commencing upon
completion of the grid connection for a seven year period. Also in that news release, MintoEx
reported that Yukon Energy had received all approvals required for the construction of the grid
extension and spur line to the Minto Mine, and construction related field
activities have commenced.
Capital Costs
No mining capital was included in the
economic analysis for the PFS as it is assumed that the mine will continue to be
serviced by a mining contractor that will provide their own equipment fleet. MintoEx currently uses a mining
contractor with whom it has a contract extending to the end of 2009. SRK has estimated capital costs
for the Phase 3 mill expansion at $3.2 million. The capital cost estimate is based on
the purchase of new equipment items for the Phase 3 expansion, principally for the pebble crusher, regrind mill and
paste thickener. Construction
labour and materials costs for the installation of the Phase 3 equipment items
were based on recent construction rates experienced at Minto. Capital costs for EPCM, indirect
expenses, and spares were factored as a percentage of the total direct
construction. A 15% contingency was
applied to the direct construction costs.
Other capital costs related to the increase in mill
capacity and the mining of Area 2 include a total of $16 million for grid power,
$1.5 million for various pumps and pipelines associated with paste and in-pit
slurried tailings deposition and $2 million for additional mine closure
costs. Total project capital costs, including the current
operation, includes $52 million during pre-production in 2006 and another total of $99 million
for the remainder of the project ? a
total of C$151 million.
Minto Mine - Summary
of Life-of-mine Capital Costs
Period |
CAPEX (C$
?000) |
Pre-production
(2006) |
$
51,850 |
2007 |
$
65,499 |
2008 |
$
25,759 |
2009 |
$
1,500 |
2010 |
$
1,600 |
2011 |
$
1,000
|
2012 |
$
1,000 |
2013 |
$
500 |
2014 |
$
250 |
2015 |
$
2,000 |
Project Total |
$
150,958 |
It should be noted that the above capital schedule
has all capital related to the connection to grid power expensed in 2008,
whereas the contract with Yukon Energy has payments made over time as noted in
the news releases referenced in the ?Grid Power Connection? section
above.
Operating
Costs
The operating costs in the PFS come from three
main sources:
v
the
DFS for the Main Pit;
v
New
supply contracts signed by MintoEx; and
v
The
2008 life-of-mine budget numbers from MintoEx.
Mining costs are based on the mining contract with
Pelly Construction and the explosives contract with Dyno Nobel Canada. The costs for these contracts are used
throughout the project life. Diesel fuel cost is assumed to be
$0.85/litre delivered to site.
Unit costs are generally higher than in the DFS as a result of cost
escalation in the past two years (including diesel, labour, explosives and
consumables).
Summary of PFS Operating
Costs
UNIT OPERATING
COSTS |
Life-of-mine |
Mining (C$/t
mined) |
$
2.80 |
Mining (C$/t
milled) |
$
21.68 |
Milling (C$/t milled) :
|
|
-
Labour |
$
2.92 |
-
Power |
$
4.88 |
-
Propane |
$
0.12 |
-
Diesel |
$
0.63 |
-
Consumables |
$
3.34 |
-
Maintenance |
$
0.33 |
-
Mobile equipment |
$
2.06 |
-
Force Accounts |
$
2.32 |
TOTAL MILLING
(C$/t
milled) |
$ 16.61
|
Camp and catering (C$/t
milled) |
$
1.46 |
General and Administration (C$/t
milled) |
$
7.03 |
Royalties (Selkirk First Nation) (C$/t
milled) |
$
0.40 |
Total unit operating costs (C$/t
milled) |
$
47.18 |
Total unit operating costs (C$/lb
Cu) |
$
1.25 |
Unit operating costs after by-product credits (C$/lb
Cu) |
$
0.92 |
MintoEx?s cost assumptions for 2008 are based on
higher costs for almost all inputs and a US$ at parity
with the Canadian dollar. Further,
the Minto Mine only has limited operating experience on which to base these
estimates and will strive to see unit cost reductions realized over the coming
periods.
Concentrate
Sales
Minto has an established concentrate
purchase contract with MRI Trading AG (?MRI?). Under the terms of the contract, MRI has
the obligation to buy all of Minto?s concentrate production and Minto has the obligation to sell all
of its concentrate production to
MRI. The contract is in effect from
July 2007 to June 2010. The MRI
contract may be extended by mutual agreement for one or more years.
Sensitivity
Analysis
The project
was evaluated for sensitivity to the commodity price of copper, operating expenses, capital
expenditures, grade of Cu and production tonnage. All sensitivities were assessed
for the range of -15% to +15% and compared to the resulting 0% discounted NPV.
0% discounted NPV derivations were
done for both pre-tax and after-tax
cash flows.
Both the pre-tax and after taxation cash flow models show the
project is most sensitive to changes
to the copper grade. This sensitivity is somewhat mitigated in the mine plan by the significant use of
stockpiles to allow the early extraction of higher grade ore and the ability to
blend different grades to provide a
consistent mill feed.
Copper price is the
variable that demonstrates the second greatest sensitivity. In Minto?s case, the Cu price is buffered by the fact that a significant
portion of its production in the
first 4 years of operation has contractual price guarantees so a reduction or increase in the
market price of copper has a tempered
affect on the NPV.
Many of Minto?s major operating
expenses including mining, explosives, TCs and RCs and concentrate transport are
covered by contracts and, therefore, offer considerable protection from variances in the next 2 to 4 years.
The project is relatively sensitive to the tonnage of ore
milled.
The project economics do not exhibit appreciable sensitivity to capital costs as the Area 2
plan and Phase 3 mill expansion require relatively little new capital. Also, all of the initial Minto Mine
construction capital has been spent and therefore has no risk of price escalation for the main contraction.
Base Case Pre-tax NPV Summary @ 0% Discount Rate (C$
millions)
|
-15% |
0 |
+15% |
Range |
Cu Price |
$162 |
$245 |
$328 |
$167 |
OPEX |
$309 |
$245 |
$180 |
$129 |
CAPEX |
$259 |
$245 |
$230 |
$29 |
Grade |
$146 |
$245 |
$343 |
$197 |
Tonnage |
$187 |
$245 |
$302 |
$115 |
Permitting
The
Minto Mine is currently permitted to process up to 912,500 tonnes of ore per year, or
2,500 tonnes per day.
Implementation of the PFS requires the processing rate to be increased to 3,500 tonnes per
day. In addition, a new pit at Area
2 and a number of other development approaches are outlined in the PFS that would require
amendments to existing permits.
MintoEx intends to make formal application for the required permit
amendments in early 2008 and plans to work closely with Yukon Government,
Selkirk First Nation and other stakeholders through these permit
amendments.
Project
Opportunities
A
number of project opportunities are identified in the PFS, including: the
potential to add additional reserves through continued exploration, further
optimization of the mine plan, improved waste management to reduce costs and
underground mining potential for deeper, higher grade
areas.
Project Risks
A
number of project risks are outlined in the PFS, including: the ability to
obtain permit amendments in a timely manner, external influences such as metal
prices and exchange rates, recoveries, capital cost and grade
control.
Resource Estimation
Methodology
Lions Gate Geological Consulting Inc. (?LGGC?), in
conjunction with SRK Consulting (Canada) Ltd. (?SRK?), conducted the
Mineral Resource estimate for the Area 2 deposit. LGGC and SRK have reviewed pertinent
geological information in sufficient detail to support the data incorporated in
the resource estimate.
Ali Shahkar, P.Eng. of LGGC is
the Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101 responsible for the
estimate. SRK was actively involved
during the estimation process,
provided guidance with geostatistical
analyses of copper and gold, estimation parameters to be used, and validated the
copper and gold block model.
The estimates for copper and gold grades were
completed on April 2, 2007 using
Gemcom?s?
3-dimensional block model commercial mine planning software, and
checked by SRK with non-commercial software. An estimate for the silver grades was
completed on June 20, 2007. More
than 98% of the value of the deposit is in copper and gold, the remaining 2% is
in silver.
Mineralization was interpreted in 5 domains (in some cases sub-domained into
separate lenses) and statistical analysis for each metal carried out for each
zone. Wireframes of these zones were created and used to inform a 15m by 15m by
3m (vertical) block model for resource estimation. Assays were then composited
into 3.0m intervals and statistical analysis completed for each metal and
variography estimated for the mineralized domains. Ordinary kriging was used to
interpolate grades for copper and gold into the block model. Bulk density
measurements collected during core logging were interpolated into the block
model using Inverse Distance method. Blocks were then classified into Measured,
Indicated and Inferred categories based on the number of drill holes and the
average distance of the composites used to estimate each block. The grades and
tonnages reported in this resource estimate represent the material contained within the mineralized
portion of the classified blocks.
Mineral Resources that are not Mineral
Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Mineral Resource estimates do not
account for mineability, selectivity, mining loss and dilution. These Mineral Resource estimates include
Inferred Mineral Resources that are normally considered too speculative
geologically to have economic considerations applied to them that would enable
them to be categorized as mineral reserves. There is also no certainty that these
Inferred Mineral Resources will be converted to Measured and Indicated
categories through further drilling, or into Mineral Reserves once economic
considerations are applied.
Technical
Report
A
NI43-101 compliant Technical Report will be filed within the next week on SEDAR
and, once filed, can be accessed under Sherwood?s profile at www.sedar.com.
Minto Project
The
Minto Mine is a high-grade open pit copper-gold deposit located in the Yukon
Territory of Canada. Sherwood acquired the Minto Project in June 2005 and, in just two
years from its acquisition, completed a bankable feasibility study, arranged
project financing, and built a $100
million open pit copper-gold mine. Commercial production commenced on October 1, 2007. In parallel with these development
activities, Sherwood has been running an exceptionally successful exploration
program that has resulted in multiple
discoveries of high grade copper-gold mineralization across its Minto Mine
property. Sherwood plans to continue this ?growth
from within? strategy along with further operational optimizations in its
relentless pursuit of value.
Sherwood
Sherwood?s successful consolidation of the ownership of
the Minto Project provides a unique investment opportunity ? participation in a
high-grade, open pit copper-gold mine located in Canada
with tremendous exploration potential on the
property.
Quality
Assurance
The technical information in this
news release has been prepared in
accordance with Canadian regulatory requirements set out in National Instrument
43-101 and reviewed by Stephen P. Quin, P. Geo., President & CEO for Sherwood Copper Corporation. The
following SRK employees are QPs for this project; Marek Nowak, P.Eng. ? Resource Estimation;
Andrew Ham, AUSIMM ? Geology; Terry Mandziak, P.E. (CO) ? Waste dumps and
Tailings Impoundments; Mike Levy, P.G. (WY) ? Geotechnical; Tom Rannelli, P.Eng.
- Economic Modeling; Gordon Doerksen, P.E. (WY) - Project Overview; Dino Pilotto, P.Eng. ? Mining and Reserves; Stephen Day, P.Geo. ? Geochemistry. Ali
Shahkar, P.Eng. of LGGC is the Qualified Person under National
Instrument 43-101 responsible for the resource estimates.
Additional
Information
Additional information on Sherwood and its Minto Project can be obtained
on Sherwood?s website at http://www.sherwoodcopper.com.
On behalf of the board of
directors
SHERWOOD COPPER
CORPORATION
?Stephen P. Quin?
Stephen P. Quin
President &
CEO
For further information
please contact Stephen Quin,
President of Sherwood Copper Corp.
or Brad Kopp or Kristy
Reynolds at (604) 687-7545 or (888) 338-2200
**
INTERNET ADDRESS: www.sherwoodcopper.com **
The TSX Venture
Exchange has not reviewed and does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or
accuracy of this press release. This news release may contain forward looking
statements which are not historical facts, such as ore reserve estimates,
anticipated production or results, sales, revenues, costs, or discussions of
goals and exploration results, and involves a number of risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. These
risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, metal price volatility,
volatility of metals production, project development, ore reserve estimates,
future anticipated reserves and cost engineering estimate risks, geological
factors and exploration results.
See the Company?s filings for a more detailed discussion of factors that
may impact expected results.
Minto Project Mineral Resource Estimate Including Reserves (@ 0.5 %Cu cut-off)
Class |
Tonnes |
In
situ Grade |
Contained
Metal |
(%Cu) |
(g/t
Au) |
(g/t
Ag) |
Cu
(Mlb) |
Au
(oz) |
Ag
(oz) |
Minto
Main (Zones 2,4,5,8)* |
Measured |
7,060,000 |
1.98 |
0.71 |
8.07 |
309 |
160,000 |
1,832,000 |
Indicated |
2,000,000 |
1.06 |
0.31 |
4.72 |
47 |
19,700 |
304,000 |
M+I |
9,060,000 |
1.78 |
0.62 |
7.33 |
356 |
180,600 |
2,135,000 |
Inferred |
90,400 |
0.81 |
0.21 |
3.81 |
2 |
600 |
11,000 |
Area
2 |
Measured |
3,578,000 |
1.56 |
0.62 |
5.48 |
123 |
71,000 |
630,000 |
Indicated |
4,018,000 |
0.99 |
0.36 |
3.26 |
88 |
47,000 |
421,000 |
M+I |
7,596,000 |
1.26 |
0.48 |
4.3 |
211 |
117,000 |
1,050,000 |
Inferred |
1,381,000 |
1.01 |
0.33 |
1.93 |
31 |
15,000 |
86,000 |
Total
Minto |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured |
10,638,000 |
1.84 |
0.68 |
7.20 |
432 |
231,000
|
2,462,000
|
Indicated |
6,018,000 |
1.01 |
0.34 |
3.75 |
135 |
66,700
|
725,000 |
M+I |
16,656,000 |
1.54 |
0.56 |
5.95 |
567 |
297,600
|
3,185,000
|
Inferred |
1,471,400 |
1.00 |
0.32 |
2.05 |
33 |
15,600
|
97,000 |
*
From DFS
Minto Area 2 Mineral Resource Estimate Excluding Reserves (@ 0.5 % Cu cut-off)
Class |
Tonnes |
In
situ Grade |
Contained
Metal |
(%Cu) |
(g/t
Au) |
(g/t
Ag) |
Cu
(Mlb) |
Au
(oz) |
Ag
(oz) |
Measured |
775,000
|
1.42
|
0.48
|
4.61
|
24 |
12,000 |
115,000
|
Indicated |
3,466,000
|
0.95
|
0.35
|
3.06
|
73 |
39,000 |
341,000
|
M+I |
4,241,000
|
1.04
|
0.37
|
3.34
|
97 |
51,000 |
456,000
|
Inferred |
1,381,000
|
1.01
|
0.33
|
1.93
|
31 |
15,000 |
86,000 |
Minto Project Mineral Reserves (@ 0.62 %Cu
cut-off)
Class |
Tonnes |
In
situ Grade |
Contained
Metal |
(%Cu) |
(g/t
Au) |
(g/t
Ag) |
Cu
(Mlb) |
Au
(oz) |
Ag
(oz) |
Main
Pit |
Proven
|
5,749,000 |
2.15 |
0.75 |
8.82 |
272.5 |
138,600 |
1,630,000 |
Probable |
350,000 |
1.22 |
0.50 |
5.98 |
9.4 |
5,600 |
67,000 |
Total |
6,099,000 |
2.10 |
0.74 |
8.66 |
281.9 |
144,300 |
1,698,000 |
Area
2 |
Proven
|
2,803,000 |
1.60 |
0.65 |
5.71 |
98.9 |
58,600 |
515,000 |
Probable |
552,000 |
1.22 |
0.44 |
4.48 |
14.8 |
7,800 |
80,000 |
Total |
3,355,000 |
1.54 |
0.62 |
5.51 |
113.7 |
66,400 |
594,000 |
Total |
Proven
|
8,552,000 |
1.97 |
0.72 |
7.80 |
371.4 |
197,200 |
2,145,000 |
Probable |
902,000 |
1.22 |
0.46 |
5.06 |
24.3 |
13,400 |
147,000 |
Total |
9,454,000 |
1.90 |
0.69 |
7.54 |
395.6 |
210,600 |
2,292,000 |