Fermer X Les cookies sont necessaires au bon fonctionnement de 24hGold.com. En poursuivant votre navigation sur notre site, vous acceptez leur utilisation.
Pour en savoir plus sur les cookies...
AnglaisFrancais
Cours Or & Argent en
Recevez notre Marketbriefing
Jim C.
Membre depuis mai 2012
463 commentaires - suivi par 3 personnes
3 abonnées
A laissé un commentaire sur l'article :
>What Americans Used To Know  - Tom DiLorenzo - lewRockwell
Vox:

The attacks against both of us, primarily me for supporting Lincoln and the North against Slavery and the South, and you -- for speaking your mind on other issues -- have been uncalled for. These articles have been posted by this site for debate, not unconditional acceptance.

Anyone call go back and see what bias DiLorenzo has against Lincoln and the North and also that of his supporters. He nitpicks at what Lincoln did wrong -- and there is much that he did do wrong (the draft, for one) -- and completely ignores the much greater evil of slavery, as many of his supporters do here as well. When facts cannot be supported, when reality is denied, is when name calling ensues by many here.

What riles me most about DiLorenzo and Lew Rockwell is what lurks behind their repeated Lincoln diatribes. It is not racism -- far worse: it is an attack on the concept of government itself, any level of government. By attacking Lincoln and extolling the right of State secession for ANY reason, they are in essence advocating anarchy -- since secession would logically ripple down to the individual level. And the concept of objective law thrown out the window.

Just yesterday, in the news, 10 counties in the State of Colorado are pushing legislation to secede. I'm sure DiLorenzo would applaud this. If that goes through nothing prevents groups within those counties from seceding as well.

That is where we are headed and that is my main concern with the DiLorenzos of the world.



Commenté
il y a 3941 jours
-
envoyer
Début de l'article :"During the weeks following the [1860] election, [Northern newspaper] editors of all parties assumed that secession as a constitutional right was not in question . . . . On the contrary, the southern claim to a right of peaceable withdrawal was countenanced out of reverence for the natural law principle of government by consent of the governed." ~ Howard Cecil Perkins, editor, Northern ... Lire la suite
Répondre à ce commentaire
Vous devez être connecté pour commenter un article8000 caractères max.
connectez-vous ou inscrivez-vous
Top articles