Articles NewsFlow La Cote de l’or et de l’argent Market Briefing

Recevez notre Marketbriefing

Dans la même rubrique

Schwerpunkt
Membre depuis octobre 2012
52 commentaires -

0 abonnées

A laissé un commentaire sur l'article :

Global Warming Chickenlittleism

- Richard Mills - Ahead of the Herd

Who’s more dangerous, the person who sticks his head in the sand or the one that further disseminates lies?

Your correct, I have no alphabet soup behind my name, neither do the people on the IPCC. As for my salary, I pay myself so unlike you I am self-employed, in fact I employ others in my own company. The real question here is, are you just another one of those who are hired to cast dispersions on anyone who would dare to challenge the IPCC and the fools who created it for political gain.

You dare to complain about data being provided by self-interest multi nationals when your defending so called experts who are sucking at the government teat knowing that if they keep putting out crap that says we’re all gonna fry they will keep getting money for free. Here’s another tid bit for you, the guys screaming about MMGW are the same morons who back ion the 70’s were screaming about how we were headed for an ice age. Go figure. As far as the NASA co2 graph, I have no issues with it, all it does is prove that after things started to warm the co2 level rose. You still bare the burden of proof to back up this scam that is MMGW. You completely ignored the Viking farms being exposed as the ice recedes. Funny thing is you’re not the only MMGW advocate on the payroll of the IPCC that has does this. IPCC science does not allow for data that does not fir its model, hence truth in IPCC data has no place and so must be discarded.

Are you thick? Did you think that the bio mass example I gave is a final piece of the puzzle? It’s an example and anyone with the intelligence to look into the matter themselves will discover far more data that shows co2 levels increase after temperatures rise. Whether this be from forest bio mass or oceans spewing out more co2. One volcano can spew out more co2 than all of mankind can produce in a year. Another fact your IPCC champions don’t want you to know.

Interesting how you can’t attack the story, you know the one I provided a link for that tells about how the IPCC is made up of politicians or bureaucrats rather than scientists and real scientists have had to sue the UN to have their names removed so you attack the author. Another typical liberal tactic, your so transparent. But to help along someone less educated allow me to provide other links that explain the creative way the IPCC used real scientists names for their benefit without the blessing of the people whose names they used:

http://newsbusters.org/node/13971

http://mclean.ch/climate/docs/IPCC_numbers.pdf

http://www.isthereglobalcooling.com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/docs/1000_scientists.23751832.pdf

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/10/the_globalwarming_debate_isnt.html

Did you even bother to look into the qualifications of the so called experts that contributed data to the IPCC that is in agreement with their desire to put out a document consistent with their agenda? These are people like mechanics, HVAC engineers, and people from various other professions that have nothing to do with climate data. On the other hand those who are real experts contributed data that is inconstant with the desire of the IPCC and yet they are still named as contributors that agree with the finished crapola.

I see no comment about Dr. Gray, the only real scientist who has reviewed all of the IPCC data and how he would like to see the IPCC sunk down a deep hole for its unscientific methods. Afraid to take on a man with alphabet soup credentials are you?

You claim there is a consensus amongst scientists that man MMGW is real, really? Well how about this little item?

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/162241

Some more items that may help you discover the truth:

http://www.galileomovement.com.au/scientific_untruths.php#B

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/02/ipcc_international_pack_of_cli.html

Here’s areal zinger for you since you took on Edmund Contoski’s credibility rather than taking on the data he provides “The old saying about playing the ball and not the man is as true today as when it was coined.” Does the word hypocrite mean anything to you? I doubt it, liberals are immune to truth.

So tell me, who’s the cash for comments person now? It also appears that you have little to no real life experience that would allow you to evaluate MMGW science and come to the understanding that its crap. I on the other hand do have some of this experience, that coupled with 30 years in varied scientific fields has ensured that I don’t fall for the line of crap you have.

As I quoted earlier, “Science is not about consensus but about discovering the truth. The claim that a consensus is “proof” of the validity of an idea is, in fact, a double fraud: it proclaims a fraudulent idea as true based upon a fraudulent standard.” The IPCC reports is based on exactly what is described in the quote.

You have provided no data to back you stance. So what we have here is someone who is hired, and working very hard, to discredit real science and anyone who opposed the IPCC. This is standard operating procedure for the IPCC.

Commenté il y a 3758 jours

envoyer

Début de l'article :The nature of the recently released report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is extremely alarmist. The report warns, with a 95% certainty, that global warming is man-made and that the resulting climate change will lead to: Rising temperatures, drought and increasing desertification Warming of the oceans and rising sea levels Shortages of food Loss of ice sheets & shrinking of glaciers Increasing intensity and size of storms There’s no doubt our climate is changing,... Lire la suite

Répondre à ce commentaire

Vous devez être connecté pour commenter un article

8000 caractères max.

connectez-vous ou inscrivez-vous

	Nos flux RSS		24hGold Mobile
	Gold Data Center		Convertisseur Or Argent
	Pièces d'or sur eBay		Pièces d'argent sur eBay
	Minières : outils techniques		Minières : outils d'analyse fondamentale